On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:24 -0500, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
I guess it depends -- maybe we're slower for PA, but maybe we're faster for other things (and I actually think we are in some cases). But point taken. The new bug triage policy should help with that (since we're giving sense to priority). What could make sense too is to send some weekly summary of the urgent things to fix for a stable release so people can easily know what is needed and help. Would you or anybody else want to help with that?
I think GNOME team is already one of the most bureaucratic of the whole distribution, at least from what appears from the ML, so I'm not really convinced that adding meetings, agendas, lists will help much. I think bugzilla is out there for that purpose, bugs have priority assignments (recently updated, btw), so it's somewhat a responsibility of the team to take care of that.
This I'm curious about - this is probably an artifact of a) being more open and b) trying to get more community involvement from a development perspective. Frankly I don't know how to do a) and b) at the same time during ramp up without being a little bureaucratic in terms of meetings and stuff because the input and feedback is wanted. -JP -- JP Rosevear <jpr@novell.com> Novell, Inc. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org