On Wednesday 14 April 2010 16:25:34 Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On 4/14/2010 at 16:20, Sandy Armstrong <sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com> wrote:
I believe the Couch stack also stands in the way of having Ubuntu One desktop client packages. I'm not advocating that we invest a lot of time adding support for a competitor's proprietary sync solution, but certainly there are users that want it, so it's worth considering before dropping the whole Couch stack.
I would not say we should just go ahead and drop the couch stack, but at least not having gwibber as the only consumer of it. Not having such a visible app require the stack gives us also more time in actually fixing that stack (couchdb itself is fine, desktop-couch is a mess, like so many python services I've seen (/rant) )
Ah, I should read everything before answering ;) So, ignore my previous email where I asked whether we should drop again the couchdb stack.... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126