On 3/18/2010 at 17:23, Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> wrote: On Thursday 18 March 2010 17:05:32 Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On 3/18/2010 at 16:55, James Ogley <riggwelter@opensuse.org> wrote: you submitted gwibber to openSUSE:FActory with: +- Added Requires: python-desktopcouch. But that package - and it's dependencies - is not yet in openSUSE:Factory.
Without that requires, someone doing an update will get a non-functioning gwibber since it was already updated to the couch-dependent version.
If the couch stack's not going into Factory, gwibber *must* be downgraded back to the 2.0 packages I submitted a while ago, newer versions have a hard dependency on couch.
I think getting couch into Factory should not be the biggest of our worries / problems. Somebody already got a package around that we can just take, cleanup and forward? (Even better if we can skip the cleanup part). I'll work on this asap.
Check: home:FunkyPenguin:Gwibber-couch/
I even took care that the packages build for Factory but haven't tested them
I used osc search python-desktopcouch and it showed my a package by Riggwelter (Isn't that James?) I already copypac'ed it to my branch and am busy fixing it up for Factory (only minor tweakings needed). name wise python-desktopcouch sounds more reasonable than gwibber-couch (it's not only for gwibber after all). At the current pace I expect that I can submit it to devel:languages:python later this evening. (I don't think the GNOME: namespace is the right one. Just because a G-app is the first consumer doesn't make that specific lib a G-lib). Dominqiue -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org