On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 10:56 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
Mike, et al:
* GNOME:STABLE
Makes sense. Whatever is our latest released product is "STABLE" for us basically.
Right, so it's worth mentioning that this theoretically could be an odd-numbered GNOME release. Unlikely (no such plans exist), but not impossible.
* GNOME:Factory
Great idea, especially if it makes it easier for non-Novell team members to contribute.
* GNOME:UNSTABLE - I expect this project to lie fallow most of the time.
Actually, how about we just put it out of everyone's misery? :)
Yeah, I don't think there's any value in keeping this around. In theory I guess we could use it to get a head start on the next major GNOME version; in practice, I don't think that's likely to happen.
* GNOME:Community - This project will continue as is.
Except it will grow and improve and ultimately take over the world!
In terms of target repositories, G:C and G:F should build against every product including Factory (think about it for a moment and G:F/openSUSE_Factory makes sense), G:S against everything EXCEPT Factory.
I'm trying to come up with a good reason why G:S should build against Factory and I can't. So I think you're right. :)
Also, for released products, they should ALWAYS use the Update repository.
Yep. Michael. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org