[openFATE 306623] Integrate openFATE with Bugzilla
Feature added by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Feature #306623, revision 1 Title: Integrate openFATE with Bugzilla openFATE: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Description: I really don't understand why we are using openFATE instead of bugzilla for tracking features... But anyway, I think we can live in both worlds. Just make openFATE indeed by a Bugzilla frontend for enhancements and we're ready to go. Of course this requires a serious re-architecture of openFATE codebase, but it would please the community around both projects and it would merge feedback mechanisms. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306623
Feature changed by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Feature #306623, revision 2 Title: Integrate openFATE with Bugzilla openFATE: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Description: I really don't understand why we are using openFATE instead of bugzilla for tracking features... But anyway, I think we can live in both - worlds. Just make openFATE indeed by a Bugzilla frontend for + worlds. Just make openFATE indeed be a Bugzilla frontend for enhancements and we're ready to go. Of course this requires a serious re-architecture of openFATE codebase, but it would please the community around both projects and it would merge feedback mechanisms. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306623
Feature changed by: Stephan Binner (Beineri) Feature #306623, revision 3 Title: Integrate openFATE with Bugzilla openFATE: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Description: I really don't understand why we are using openFATE instead of bugzilla for tracking features... But anyway, I think we can live in both worlds. Just make openFATE indeed be a Bugzilla frontend for enhancements and we're ready to go. Of course this requires a serious re-architecture of openFATE codebase, but it would please the community around both projects and it would merge feedback mechanisms. + Discussion: + #1: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-07-02 08:53:41) + Please read http://en.opensuse.org/OpenFATE/Faq for a start. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306623
Feature changed by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Feature #306623, revision 4 Title: Integrate openFATE with Bugzilla openFATE: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Description: I really don't understand why we are using openFATE instead of bugzilla for tracking features... But anyway, I think we can live in both worlds. Just make openFATE indeed be a Bugzilla frontend for enhancements and we're ready to go. Of course this requires a serious re-architecture of openFATE codebase, but it would please the community around both projects and it would merge feedback mechanisms. Discussion: #1: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-07-02 08:53:41) Please read http://en.opensuse.org/OpenFATE/Faq for a start. + #2: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) (2009-07-02 15:55:56) + Thanks for the link. + + However I don't see the big deal. Bugzilla already supports multiple + products, and I'm not sure if the openFATE's role's features could be + mapped to Bugzilla's current permissions administration. If not, it + could always be patched upstream. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306623
Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #306623, revision 5 Title: Integrate openFATE with Bugzilla - openFATE: Unconfirmed + openFATE: Rejected by Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) + reject date: 2009-08-12 10:32:30 + reject reason: We evaluated this before we started with FATE and + rejected it. Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) Description: I really don't understand why we are using openFATE instead of bugzilla for tracking features... But anyway, I think we can live in both worlds. Just make openFATE indeed be a Bugzilla frontend for enhancements and we're ready to go. Of course this requires a serious re-architecture of openFATE codebase, but it would please the community around both projects and it would merge feedback mechanisms. Discussion: #1: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-07-02 08:53:41) Please read http://en.opensuse.org/OpenFATE/Faq for a start. #2: Andrés G. Aragoneses (knocte) (2009-07-02 15:55:56) Thanks for the link. - However I don't see the big deal. Bugzilla already supports multiple products, and I'm not sure if the openFATE's role's features could be mapped to Bugzilla's current permissions administration. If not, it could always be patched upstream. + #3: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-08-12 10:33:47) + The Bugzilla architecture would need quite some enhancements to support + what we need with fate. Having two tools is unfortunate but patching + bugzilla is way too involved. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306623
participants (1)
-
fate_noreply＠suse.de