Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #306921, revision 5 Title: s390(x) dump analysis on x86/x86_64 using crosscrash Hackweek IV: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important - openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed + openSUSE-11.2: Rejected by Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) + reject date: 2009-08-12 10:49:21 + reject reason: Too late for 11.2. Priority Requester: Important openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Petr Tesařík (ptesarik) Description: crosscrash is an unfinished tool, though interesting. One of the major drawbacks is its inability to open dumps from big- endian architectures on little-endian hosts, most importantly s390x dumps on x86_64. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306921

Feature changed by: Alexander Osthof (aosthof) Feature #306921, revision 11 Title: s390(x) dump analysis on x86/x86_64 using crosscrash Hackweek IV: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important openSUSE-11.2: Rejected by Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) reject date: 2009-08-12 10:49:21 reject reason: Too late for 11.2. Priority Requester: Important openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Petr Tesařík (ptesarik) Description: crosscrash is an unfinished tool, though interesting. One of the major drawbacks is its inability to open dumps from big- endian architectures on little-endian hosts, most importantly s390x dumps on x86_64. Discussion: #2: Petr Tesařík (ptesarik) (2009-08-17 07:46:46) crosscrash is already on the SLES11 media (with all the implications such as L3 support). Bernhard's original idea was to replace crash with crosscrash completely, so it made sense to include it in SLES. On the other hand, the tool would be useful primarily to companies like Intel, IBM, HP, and SGI. AFAIK none of them would object to having crosscrash only in SDK. In short, I don't have strong opinion about SLES/SDK question. + #4: Alexander Osthof (aosthof) (2009-08-27 19:59:38) + Mike, Petr, go ahead. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306921

Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #306921, revision 20 Title: s390(x) dump analysis on x86/x86_64 using crosscrash Hackweek IV: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important openSUSE-11.2: Rejected by Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) reject date: 2009-08-12 10:49:21 reject reason: Too late for 11.2. Priority Requester: Important - openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed + openSUSE-11.3: Rejected by (a_jaeger) + reject date: 2010-03-02 13:50:13 + reject reason: Out of scope for openSUSE 11.3. Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Petr Tesařík (ptesarik) Description: crosscrash is an unfinished tool, though interesting. One of the major drawbacks is its inability to open dumps from big- endian architectures on little-endian hosts, most importantly s390x dumps on x86_64. Discussion: #2: Petr Tesařík (ptesarik) (2009-08-17 07:46:46) crosscrash is already on the SLES11 media (with all the implications such as L3 support). Bernhard's original idea was to replace crash with crosscrash completely, so it made sense to include it in SLES. On the other hand, the tool would be useful primarily to companies like Intel, IBM, HP, and SGI. AFAIK none of them would object to having crosscrash only in SDK. In short, I don't have strong opinion about SLES/SDK question. #4: Alexander Osthof (aosthof) (2009-08-27 19:59:38) Mike, Petr, go ahead. #9: Petr Tesařík (ptesarik) (2009-09-22 09:37:07) (reply to #8) Based on an e-mail conversation with Mike Hager, it's possible to dedicate the time to do this, so it will be implemented for SLES11SP1. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306921