[New: openFATE 321478] Updated texlive in the main repository
Feature added by: hehe br (hehe_br) Feature #321478, revision 1 Title: Updated texlive in the main repository openSUSE Distribution: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: hehe br (hehe_br) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Here are some suggestions for texlive in openSUSE: 1) Make the package manager to recognise texlive installation from texlive own installer.(Installation apart from package manager) 2) Make texlive not an obligatory installation for tex related apps. For example, if I want to install Gummy tex editor it will install the whole outdated version of texlive (2013) that is in the main repository. 3) Is there a way to keep texlive in the main repository in sync with texlive own repository? The texlive in Publishing:Texlive repository is better(2016) but does not have the latest updates. Thanks for your help and attention! Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: texlive in the main repository is outdated! (2013) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/321478
Feature changed by: Sebastian Wagner (sebix) Feature #321478, revision 2 Title: Updated texlive in the main repository openSUSE Distribution: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: hehe br (hehe_br) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Here are some suggestions for texlive in openSUSE: 1) Make the package manager to recognise texlive installation from texlive own installer. (Installation apart from package manager) 2) Make texlive not an obligatory installation for tex related apps. For example, if I want to install Gummy tex editor it will install the whole outdated version of texlive (2013) that is in the main repository. 3) Is there a way to keep texlive in the main repository in sync with texlive own repository? The texlive in Publishing:Texlive repository is better (2016) but does not have the latest updates. Thanks for your help and attention! Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: texlive in the main repository is outdated! (2013) + Discussion: + #1: Sebastian Wagner (sebix) (2016-09-29 19:00:53) + 1) and 2) are feature requests for the texlive-installer (non-rpm). See + https://www.tug.org/texlive/debian.html#vanilla how this is done for + debian. + 3) Factory has 2016 -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/321478
Feature changed by: Karl Cheng (qantas94heavy) Feature #321478, revision 3 Title: Updated texlive in the main repository - openSUSE Distribution: Unconfirmed + openSUSE Distribution: Done Priority Requester: Important Requested by: hehe br (hehe_br) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Here are some suggestions for texlive in openSUSE: 1) Make the package manager to recognise texlive installation from texlive own installer. (Installation apart from package manager) 2) Make texlive not an obligatory installation for tex related apps. For example, if I want to install Gummy tex editor it will install the whole outdated version of texlive (2013) that is in the main repository. 3) Is there a way to keep texlive in the main repository in sync with texlive own repository? The texlive in Publishing:Texlive repository is better (2016) but does not have the latest updates. Thanks for your help and attention! Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: texlive in the main repository is outdated! (2013) Discussion: #1: Sebastian Wagner (sebix) (2016-09-29 19:00:53) 1) and 2) are feature requests for the texlive-installer (non-rpm). See https://www.tug.org/texlive/debian.html#vanilla how this is done for debian. 3) Factory has 2016 + #2: Karl Cheng (qantas94heavy) (2016-11-18 04:49:57) + There is now a slightly newer TeXLive in Leap 42.2 (2015). -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/321478
participants (1)
-
fate_noreply＠suse.de