[openFATE 307624] Build all noarch subpackages as noarch
Feature added by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Feature #307624, revision 1 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Feature #307624, revision 2 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed Priority - Requester: Important + Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #307624, revision 3 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch - openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed + openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. - See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. + Discussion: + #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) + The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the + ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Vincent Untz (vuntz) Feature #307624, revision 4 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. + #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) + Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing + the list of source packages that should get fixed? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Feature #307624, revision 5 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? + #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) + I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw + an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and + contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using + rpmlintrc). -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Stephan Kulow (coolo) Feature #307624, revision 6 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using rpmlintrc). + #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-09 14:58:18) (reply to #3) + are you volunteering to fix em all? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Feature #307624, revision 7 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using rpmlintrc). #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-09 14:58:18) (reply to #3) are you volunteering to fix em all? + #5: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 15:09:47) (reply to #4) + As the fix is a oneliner patch to spec file I don't see a big problem. + Once the Factory is unfrozen and the check is enabled (and the original + maintainer hadn't fixed the problem already) I could go and fix the + remaining packages. List of the packages generated from rpmlint reports + might help, though. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Michal Marek (michal-m) Feature #307624, revision 8 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using rpmlintrc). #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-09 14:58:18) (reply to #3) are you volunteering to fix em all? #5: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 15:09:47) (reply to #4) As the fix is a oneliner patch to spec file I don't see a big problem. Once the Factory is unfrozen and the check is enabled (and the original maintainer hadn't fixed the problem already) I could go and fix the remaining packages. List of the packages generated from rpmlint reports might help, though. + #6: Michal Marek (michal-m) (2009-09-10 09:57:19) (reply to #5) + A list generated from rpmlint warnings instead of errors should work + for you as well, shouldn't it? I'm all for reducing duplication, but + does it justify breaking build of half of Factory? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Feature #307624, revision 9 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using rpmlintrc). #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-09 14:58:18) (reply to #3) are you volunteering to fix em all? #5: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 15:09:47) (reply to #4) As the fix is a oneliner patch to spec file I don't see a big problem. Once the Factory is unfrozen and the check is enabled (and the original maintainer hadn't fixed the problem already) I could go and fix the remaining packages. List of the packages generated from rpmlint reports might help, though. #6: Michal Marek (michal-m) (2009-09-10 09:57:19) (reply to #5) A list generated from rpmlint warnings instead of errors should work for you as well, shouldn't it? I'm all for reducing duplication, but does it justify breaking build of half of Factory? + #7: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-10 13:37:59) (reply to #6) + Sounds good. I thought Vincent meant manually managed list, that's why + I suggested rpmlint check. If it wasn't the case sorry for the noise :- + ) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) Feature #307624, revision 11 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using rpmlintrc). #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-09 14:58:18) (reply to #3) are you volunteering to fix em all? #5: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 15:09:47) (reply to #4) As the fix is a oneliner patch to spec file I don't see a big problem. Once the Factory is unfrozen and the check is enabled (and the original maintainer hadn't fixed the problem already) I could go and fix the remaining packages. List of the packages generated from rpmlint reports might help, though. #6: Michal Marek (michal-m) (2009-09-10 09:57:19) (reply to #5) A list generated from rpmlint warnings instead of errors should work for you as well, shouldn't it? I'm all for reducing duplication, but does it justify breaking build of half of Factory? #7: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-10 13:37:59) (reply to #6) Sounds good. I thought Vincent meant manually managed list, that's why I suggested rpmlint check. If it wasn't the case sorry for the noise :- ) + #8: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-10-07 17:03:33) (reply to #7) + The rpmlint check may still be a good idea for non-OBS builds with + autobuild/lbuild. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Stephan Kulow (coolo) Feature #307624, revision 12 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation Priority Requester: Mandatory + Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using rpmlintrc). #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-09 14:58:18) (reply to #3) are you volunteering to fix em all? #5: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 15:09:47) (reply to #4) As the fix is a oneliner patch to spec file I don't see a big problem. Once the Factory is unfrozen and the check is enabled (and the original maintainer hadn't fixed the problem already) I could go and fix the remaining packages. List of the packages generated from rpmlint reports might help, though. #6: Michal Marek (michal-m) (2009-09-10 09:57:19) (reply to #5) A list generated from rpmlint warnings instead of errors should work for you as well, shouldn't it? I'm all for reducing duplication, but does it justify breaking build of half of Factory? #7: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-10 13:37:59) (reply to #6) Sounds good. I thought Vincent meant manually managed list, that's why I suggested rpmlint check. If it wasn't the case sorry for the noise :- ) #8: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-10-07 17:03:33) (reply to #7) The rpmlint check may still be a good idea for non-OBS builds with autobuild/lbuild. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Feature #307624, revision 14 Title: Build all noarch subpackages as noarch - openSUSE-11.3: Evaluation by project manager + openSUSE-11.3: Done Priority Requester: Mandatory Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: The new RPM brought a feature which allows to build subpackages as noarch even when the main package is architecture dependent. By using this we could save lots of space on mirrors and media. See http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-09/msg00170.html for reference. Discussion: #1: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) (2009-09-08 13:37:08) The referenced email speaks about a saving of more than 600 MB for the ftp tree and therefore I suggest to move forward with this. #2: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-09-08 19:03:33) Would it be possible to have a webpage that is updated daily, showing the list of source packages that should get fixed? #3: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 14:38:03) (reply to #2) I think it would make more sense to modify the rpmlint script to throw an error instead of warning if the package is not marked as noarch and contains no arch dependent files. (One can still ignore the error using rpmlintrc). #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-09 14:58:18) (reply to #3) are you volunteering to fix em all? #5: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-09 15:09:47) (reply to #4) As the fix is a oneliner patch to spec file I don't see a big problem. Once the Factory is unfrozen and the check is enabled (and the original maintainer hadn't fixed the problem already) I could go and fix the remaining packages. List of the packages generated from rpmlint reports might help, though. #6: Michal Marek (michal-m) (2009-09-10 09:57:19) (reply to #5) A list generated from rpmlint warnings instead of errors should work for you as well, shouldn't it? I'm all for reducing duplication, but does it justify breaking build of half of Factory? #7: Pavol Rusnak (prusnak) (2009-09-10 13:37:59) (reply to #6) Sounds good. I thought Vincent meant manually managed list, that's why I suggested rpmlint check. If it wasn't the case sorry for the noise :- ) #8: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-10-07 17:03:33) (reply to #7) The rpmlint check may still be a good idea for non-OBS builds with autobuild/lbuild. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/307624
participants (1)
-
fate_noreply@suse.de