[openFATE 305919] Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker
Feature added by: Stephan Kulow (coolo) Feature #305919, revision 1, last change by Title: Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) Description: Why Hunspell? MySpell is not developed for quite a long time either in Mozilla and in OpenOffice.org. Hunspell is a fork of MySpell, it has great improvements is several ways, and fully backward compatible with MySpell. Main features: * Extended support for language peculiarities; Unicode character ncoding, compounding and complex morphology. * Improved suggestion using n-gram similarity, rule and dictionary ased pronounciation data. * Morphological analysis, stemming and generation. * Hunspell is based on MySpell and works also with MySpell dictionaries. * GPL/LGPL/MPL tri-license http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunspell http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/ Fedora project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary I also find a reference in the wishlist: http://en.opensuse.org/Wishlist_Various Relations: - Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker (novell/bugzilla/id: 354554) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354554 Discussion: #1: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-01-18 06:18:21) For reference: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2008-01/msg00156.html #2: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:20:54) * ** Bug 301458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #3: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:24:25) I'll do my best to do it for openSUSE-11.0. I am still busy with some other things. Or Michael, do you have time to look at it? #4: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-27 12:17:56) patch for gtkspell (2.0.11): http://www.abisource.com/~dom/gtkspell-2.0.11-enchant.patch using this patch makes obsolate the gtkspell-gcc-err-fix.diff patch for gnome-spell 1.0.7: based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426347 attached #5: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-28 05:44:13) Adding gtkspell maintainer to CC. #6: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-28 05:52:56) Created an attachment (id=191980) gnome spell check patch #7: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 02:24:22) now available in Build Service (without dictionaries) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/ #8: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-04 02:49:51) Proposed patch for gtkspell has been added. #9: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 12:38:37) dictionaries http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/n... #10: Martin Schlander (cb400f) (2008-02-05 01:30:16) For Danish (da_DK) there's a dictionary being developed that's optimized for hunspell at http://www.stavekontrolden.dk http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.dic http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.aff I believe it's already a better option for hunspell than the dictionary from http://da.speling.org which is currently packaged. If not already it will become so soon as it's developed a lot more actively. Furthermore it's available under these licenses: GPL version 2 LGPL version 2.1 MPL version 1.1 Don't hesitate to ask if there are further questions. #11: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-05 07:25:42) da_DK dictionary updated what is the next step? Someone had to decide to add it to the factory for further test. #12: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-02-05 09:57:30) Lado. is there any chance that you could create the hunspell package for STABLE/FACTORY? I am still busy with some other stuff. #13: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-06 02:49:05) O.K. I'll do it. It won't be in Alpha 2 because it is already under mastering process. It should appear in Alpha 3. #14: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-19 06:14:25) Package is in Factory. #15: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-21 03:48:22) imho several tasks left: * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. ttps://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell ttp://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 more info: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... * Removing hunspell from Enchant ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 * vim patch for hunspell: ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? #16: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-21 04:13:53) (In reply to comment #15 from kalman kemenczy) > imho several tasks left: > > * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 > > * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 > more info: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... > > * Removing hunspell from Enchant > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 > > * vim patch for hunspell: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 > > Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? Adding kde-maintainers and gnome-maintainers to CC. Reassigning to vim maintainer. #17: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-03-23 12:43:01) * ** Bug 237828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #18: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-05-01 15:57:47) - any news from vim maintainer on this? - enchant still needs rework or update - gnome-spell still needs enchant support added #19: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-05-05 04:40:12) Adding JP. What do you think about this? See comment #15 and #18. #20: Matthias Koenig (makoenig) (2008-05-05 06:42:03) There are some problems with the vim patch. Currently we have /bin/vim-normal as default vim and /usr/bin/vim-enhanced. As the patch links against libhunspell which lives in /usr/lib{,64} we cannot link /bin/vim-normal against this. This would require either moving libhunspell to /lib{,64} which is not want we want (libhunspell itself also links against /usr/lib{,64}/libstdc++), or building /bin/vim-normal without syntax features at all (as the spell features seem to be tightly coupled to the general syntax features), which I also don't want. The best solution would be to provide a /bin/vim-tiny with minimal features and moving /bin/vim-normal to /usr/bin/vim-normal. But this will not happen for 11.0, as it will need yet another vim package restructuring. But, despite of this, yes, I think using hunspell is a good idea, as the vim dictionaries are derived from the OO ones and would otherwise waste a lot of space by duplicated data. Also worth mentioning, that this patch has been sent a year ago to upstream. While the idea has been appreciated, the patch has been rejected as is, AFAIK there has not been any work to improve this: http://www.mail-archive.com/vim-dev@vim.org/msg03252.html #21: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:54:06) Created an attachment (id=214116) Gnome spell enchant patch here is the latest and greatest patch wirtten by Szilveszter Farkas from Ubuntu community, however this is created for gnome-spell 1.0.7, maybe it could use for 1.0.8. #22: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:57:46) Rodrigo, could you check this patch to gnome-spell, please? https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=214116 Hopefully you are the maintainer for this packge. Many thanks, kalman #23: Stanislav Brabec (sbrabec) (2008-05-21 04:21:49) Patch applied (autogenerated files removed from it). #24: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-11 18:53:30) There's a ton of spelling tools, why could not it have used one of the previously packaged ones, aka aspell or ispell? #25: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 01:19:59) Jan, Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE. To answer your why's please read comment#1 #26: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-12 03:06:41)
Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE
But was not in 10.3. Hence the question.
comment#1
First comment says "Myspell". I asked about aspell/ispell. #27: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 03:41:41) I think there are some reasons why choose Mozilla and OpenOffice.org and why Fedora decided as well, and slowly Ubuntu will go this way. In my comment#1 you should find the awesome summary: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary Hunspell is not a question, the question is when? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305919
* Removing hunspell from Enchant > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 > > * vim patch for hunspell: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 > > Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? Adding kde-maintainers and gnome-maintainers to CC. Reassigning to vim
Feature changed by: Andre Duffeck (aduffeck) Feature #305919, revision 2 Title: Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) Description: Why Hunspell? MySpell is not developed for quite a long time either in Mozilla and in OpenOffice.org. Hunspell is a fork of MySpell, it has great improvements is several ways, and fully backward compatible with MySpell. Main features: * Extended support for language peculiarities; Unicode character ncoding, compounding and complex morphology. * Improved suggestion using n-gram similarity, rule and dictionary ased pronounciation data. * Morphological analysis, stemming and generation. * Hunspell is based on MySpell and works also with MySpell dictionaries. * GPL/LGPL/MPL tri-license http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunspell http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/ Fedora project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary I also find a reference in the wishlist: http://en.opensuse.org/Wishlist_Various Relations: - Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker (novell/bugzilla/id: 354554) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354554 Discussion: #1: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-01-18 06:18:21) For reference: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2008-01/msg00156.html #2: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:20:54) * ** Bug 301458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #3: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:24:25) I'll do my best to do it for openSUSE-11.0. I am still busy with some other things. Or Michael, do you have time to look at it? #4: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-27 12:17:56) patch for gtkspell (2.0.11): http://www.abisource.com/~dom/gtkspell-2.0.11-enchant.patch using this patch makes obsolate the gtkspell-gcc-err-fix.diff patch for gnome-spell 1.0.7: based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426347 attached #5: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-28 05:44:13) Adding gtkspell maintainer to CC. #6: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-28 05:52:56) Created an attachment (id=191980) gnome spell check patch #7: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 02:24:22) now available in Build Service (without dictionaries) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/ #8: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-04 02:49:51) Proposed patch for gtkspell has been added. #9: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 12:38:37) dictionaries http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/n... #10: Martin Schlander (cb400f) (2008-02-05 01:30:16) For Danish (da_DK) there's a dictionary being developed that's optimized for hunspell at http://www.stavekontrolden.dk http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.dic http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.aff I believe it's already a better option for hunspell than the dictionary from http://da.speling.org which is currently packaged. If not already it will become so soon as it's developed a lot more actively. Furthermore it's available under these licenses: GPL version 2 LGPL version 2.1 MPL version 1.1 Don't hesitate to ask if there are further questions. #11: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-05 07:25:42) da_DK dictionary updated what is the next step? Someone had to decide to add it to the factory for further test. #12: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-02-05 09:57:30) Lado. is there any chance that you could create the hunspell package for STABLE/FACTORY? I am still busy with some other stuff. #13: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-06 02:49:05) O.K. I'll do it. It won't be in Alpha 2 because it is already under mastering process. It should appear in Alpha 3. #14: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-19 06:14:25) Package is in Factory. #15: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-21 03:48:22) imho several tasks left: * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. ttps://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell ttp://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 more info: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... * Removing hunspell from Enchant ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 * vim patch for hunspell: ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? #16: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-21 04:13:53) (In reply to comment #15 from kalman kemenczy) > imho several tasks left: > > * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 > > * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 > more info: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... maintainer. #17: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-03-23 12:43:01) * ** Bug 237828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #18: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-05-01 15:57:47) - any news from vim maintainer on this? - enchant still needs rework or update - gnome-spell still needs enchant support added #19: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-05-05 04:40:12) Adding JP. What do you think about this? See comment #15 and #18. #20: Matthias Koenig (makoenig) (2008-05-05 06:42:03) There are some problems with the vim patch. Currently we have /bin/vim- normal as default vim and /usr/bin/vim-enhanced. As the patch links against libhunspell which lives in /usr/lib{,64} we cannot link /bin/vim-normal against this. This would require either moving libhunspell to /lib{,64} which is not want we want (libhunspell itself also links against /usr/lib{,64}/libstdc++), or building /bin/vim- normal without syntax features at all (as the spell features seem to be tightly coupled to the general syntax features), which I also don't want. The best solution would be to provide a /bin/vim-tiny with minimal features and moving /bin/vim-normal to /usr/bin/vim-normal. But this will not happen for 11.0, as it will need yet another vim package restructuring. But, despite of this, yes, I think using hunspell is a good idea, as the vim dictionaries are derived from the OO ones and would otherwise waste a lot of space by duplicated data. Also worth mentioning, that this patch has been sent a year ago to upstream. While the idea has been appreciated, the patch has been rejected as is, AFAIK there has not been any work to improve this: http://www.mail-archive.com/vim-dev@vim.org/msg03252.html #21: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:54:06) Created an attachment (id=214116) Gnome spell enchant patch here is the latest and greatest patch wirtten by Szilveszter Farkas from Ubuntu community, however this is created for gnome-spell 1.0.7, maybe it could use for 1.0.8. #22: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:57:46) Rodrigo, could you check this patch to gnome-spell, please? https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=214116 Hopefully you are the maintainer for this packge. Many thanks, kalman #23: Stanislav Brabec (sbrabec) (2008-05-21 04:21:49) Patch applied (autogenerated files removed from it). #24: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-11 18:53:30) There's a ton of spelling tools, why could not it have used one of the previously packaged ones, aka aspell or ispell? #25: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 01:19:59) Jan, Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE. To answer your why's please read comment#1 #26: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-12 03:06:41)
Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE But was not in 10.3. Hence the question. comment#1 First comment says "Myspell". I asked about aspell/ispell.
#27: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 03:41:41) I think there are some reasons why choose Mozilla and OpenOffice.org and why Fedora decided as well, and slowly Ubuntu will go this way. In my comment#1 you should find the awesome summary: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary Hunspell is not a question, the question is when? + #29: Andre Duffeck (aduffeck) (2009-02-26 10:10:45) + There already is feature #305688: system wide spellchecker (hunspell) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305919
* Removing hunspell from Enchant > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 > > * vim patch for hunspell: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 > > Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? Adding kde-maintainers and gnome-maintainers to CC. Reassigning to vim
Feature changed by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Feature #305919, revision 4 Title: Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker - openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed + openSUSE-11.2: Duplicate of #305688 Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) Description: Why Hunspell? MySpell is not developed for quite a long time either in Mozilla and in OpenOffice.org. Hunspell is a fork of MySpell, it has great improvements is several ways, and fully backward compatible with MySpell. Main features: * Extended support for language peculiarities; Unicode character ncoding, compounding and complex morphology. * Improved suggestion using n-gram similarity, rule and dictionary ased pronounciation data. * Morphological analysis, stemming and generation. * Hunspell is based on MySpell and works also with MySpell dictionaries. * GPL/LGPL/MPL tri-license http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunspell http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/ Fedora project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary I also find a reference in the wishlist: http://en.opensuse.org/Wishlist_Various Relations: - Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker (novell/bugzilla/id: 354554) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354554 Discussion: #1: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-01-18 06:18:21) For reference: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2008-01/msg00156.html #2: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:20:54) * ** Bug 301458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #3: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:24:25) I'll do my best to do it for openSUSE-11.0. I am still busy with some other things. Or Michael, do you have time to look at it? #4: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-27 12:17:56) patch for gtkspell (2.0.11): http://www.abisource.com/~dom/gtkspell-2.0.11-enchant.patch using this patch makes obsolate the gtkspell-gcc-err-fix.diff patch for gnome-spell 1.0.7: based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426347 attached #5: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-28 05:44:13) Adding gtkspell maintainer to CC. #6: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-28 05:52:56) Created an attachment (id=191980) gnome spell check patch #7: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 02:24:22) now available in Build Service (without dictionaries) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/ #8: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-04 02:49:51) Proposed patch for gtkspell has been added. #9: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 12:38:37) dictionaries http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/n... #10: Martin Schlander (cb400f) (2008-02-05 01:30:16) For Danish (da_DK) there's a dictionary being developed that's optimized for hunspell at http://www.stavekontrolden.dk http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.dic http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.aff I believe it's already a better option for hunspell than the dictionary from http://da.speling.org which is currently packaged. If not already it will become so soon as it's developed a lot more actively. Furthermore it's available under these licenses: GPL version 2 LGPL version 2.1 MPL version 1.1 Don't hesitate to ask if there are further questions. #11: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-05 07:25:42) da_DK dictionary updated what is the next step? Someone had to decide to add it to the factory for further test. #12: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-02-05 09:57:30) Lado. is there any chance that you could create the hunspell package for STABLE/FACTORY? I am still busy with some other stuff. #13: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-06 02:49:05) O.K. I'll do it. It won't be in Alpha 2 because it is already under mastering process. It should appear in Alpha 3. #14: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-19 06:14:25) Package is in Factory. #15: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-21 03:48:22) imho several tasks left: * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. ttps://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell ttp://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 more info: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... * Removing hunspell from Enchant ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 * vim patch for hunspell: ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? #16: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-21 04:13:53) (In reply to comment #15 from kalman kemenczy) > imho several tasks left: > > * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 > > * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 > more info: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... maintainer. #17: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-03-23 12:43:01) * ** Bug 237828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #18: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-05-01 15:57:47) - any news from vim maintainer on this? - enchant still needs rework or update - gnome-spell still needs enchant support added #19: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-05-05 04:40:12) Adding JP. What do you think about this? See comment #15 and #18. #20: Matthias Koenig (makoenig) (2008-05-05 06:42:03) There are some problems with the vim patch. Currently we have /bin/vim- normal as default vim and /usr/bin/vim-enhanced. As the patch links against libhunspell which lives in /usr/lib{,64} we cannot link /bin/vim-normal against this. This would require either moving libhunspell to /lib{,64} which is not want we want (libhunspell itself also links against /usr/lib{,64}/libstdc++), or building /bin/vim- normal without syntax features at all (as the spell features seem to be tightly coupled to the general syntax features), which I also don't want. The best solution would be to provide a /bin/vim-tiny with minimal features and moving /bin/vim-normal to /usr/bin/vim-normal. But this will not happen for 11.0, as it will need yet another vim package restructuring. But, despite of this, yes, I think using hunspell is a good idea, as the vim dictionaries are derived from the OO ones and would otherwise waste a lot of space by duplicated data. Also worth mentioning, that this patch has been sent a year ago to upstream. While the idea has been appreciated, the patch has been rejected as is, AFAIK there has not been any work to improve this: http://www.mail-archive.com/vim-dev@vim.org/msg03252.html #21: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:54:06) Created an attachment (id=214116) Gnome spell enchant patch here is the latest and greatest patch wirtten by Szilveszter Farkas from Ubuntu community, however this is created for gnome-spell 1.0.7, maybe it could use for 1.0.8. #22: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:57:46) Rodrigo, could you check this patch to gnome-spell, please? https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=214116 Hopefully you are the maintainer for this packge. Many thanks, kalman #23: Stanislav Brabec (sbrabec) (2008-05-21 04:21:49) Patch applied (autogenerated files removed from it). #24: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-11 18:53:30) There's a ton of spelling tools, why could not it have used one of the previously packaged ones, aka aspell or ispell? #25: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 01:19:59) Jan, Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE. To answer your why's please read comment#1 #26: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-12 03:06:41)
Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE But was not in 10.3. Hence the question. comment#1 First comment says "Myspell". I asked about aspell/ispell.
#27: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 03:41:41) I think there are some reasons why choose Mozilla and OpenOffice.org and why Fedora decided as well, and slowly Ubuntu will go this way. In my comment#1 you should find the awesome summary: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary Hunspell is not a question, the question is when? #29: Andre Duffeck (aduffeck) (2009-02-26 10:10:45) There already is feature #305688: system wide spellchecker (hunspell) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305919
* Removing hunspell from Enchant > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 > > * vim patch for hunspell: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 > > Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? Adding kde-maintainers and gnome-maintainers to CC. Reassigning to vim
Feature changed by: Scott Couston (zczc2311) Feature #305919, revision 5 Title: Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker openSUSE-11.2: Duplicate of #305688 + Master status: Rejected by Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> + reject date: 2009-08-12 11:30:45 + reject reason: too late for 11.2 Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Why Hunspell? MySpell is not developed for quite a long time either in Mozilla and in OpenOffice.org. Hunspell is a fork of MySpell, it has great improvements is several ways, and fully backward compatible with MySpell. Main features: * Extended support for language peculiarities; Unicode character ncoding, compounding and complex morphology. * Improved suggestion using n-gram similarity, rule and dictionary ased pronounciation data. * Morphological analysis, stemming and generation. * Hunspell is based on MySpell and works also with MySpell dictionaries. * GPL/LGPL/MPL tri-license http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunspell http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/ Fedora project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary I also find a reference in the wishlist: http://en.opensuse.org/Wishlist_Various Relations: - Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker (novell/bugzilla/id: 354554) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354554 Discussion: #1: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-01-18 06:18:21) For reference: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2008-01/msg00156.html #2: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:20:54) * ** Bug 301458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #3: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:24:25) I'll do my best to do it for openSUSE-11.0. I am still busy with some other things. Or Michael, do you have time to look at it? #4: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-27 12:17:56) patch for gtkspell (2.0.11): http://www.abisource.com/~dom/gtkspell-2.0.11-enchant.patch using this patch makes obsolate the gtkspell-gcc-err-fix.diff patch for gnome-spell 1.0.7: based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426347 attached #5: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-28 05:44:13) Adding gtkspell maintainer to CC. #6: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-28 05:52:56) Created an attachment (id=191980) gnome spell check patch #7: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 02:24:22) now available in Build Service (without dictionaries) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/ #8: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-04 02:49:51) Proposed patch for gtkspell has been added. #9: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 12:38:37) dictionaries http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/n... #10: Martin Schlander (cb400f) (2008-02-05 01:30:16) For Danish (da_DK) there's a dictionary being developed that's optimized for hunspell at http://www.stavekontrolden.dk http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.dic http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.aff I believe it's already a better option for hunspell than the dictionary from http://da.speling.org which is currently packaged. If not already it will become so soon as it's developed a lot more actively. Furthermore it's available under these licenses: GPL version 2 LGPL version 2.1 MPL version 1.1 Don't hesitate to ask if there are further questions. #11: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-05 07:25:42) da_DK dictionary updated what is the next step? Someone had to decide to add it to the factory for further test. #12: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-02-05 09:57:30) Lado. is there any chance that you could create the hunspell package for STABLE/FACTORY? I am still busy with some other stuff. #13: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-06 02:49:05) O.K. I'll do it. It won't be in Alpha 2 because it is already under mastering process. It should appear in Alpha 3. #14: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-19 06:14:25) Package is in Factory. #15: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-21 03:48:22) imho several tasks left: * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. ttps://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell ttp://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 more info: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... * Removing hunspell from Enchant ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 * vim patch for hunspell: ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? #16: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-21 04:13:53) (In reply to comment #15 from kalman kemenczy) > imho several tasks left: > > * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 > > * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 > more info: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.htm... maintainer. #17: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-03-23 12:43:01) * ** Bug 237828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #18: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-05-01 15:57:47) - any news from vim maintainer on this? - enchant still needs rework or update - gnome-spell still needs enchant support added #19: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-05-05 04:40:12) Adding JP. What do you think about this? See comment #15 and #18. #20: Matthias Koenig (makoenig) (2008-05-05 06:42:03) There are some problems with the vim patch. Currently we have /bin/vim- normal as default vim and /usr/bin/vim-enhanced. As the patch links against libhunspell which lives in /usr/lib{,64} we cannot link /bin/vim-normal against this. This would require either moving libhunspell to /lib{,64} which is not want we want (libhunspell itself also links against /usr/lib{,64}/libstdc++), or building /bin/vim- normal without syntax features at all (as the spell features seem to be tightly coupled to the general syntax features), which I also don't want. The best solution would be to provide a /bin/vim-tiny with minimal features and moving /bin/vim-normal to /usr/bin/vim-normal. But this will not happen for 11.0, as it will need yet another vim package restructuring. But, despite of this, yes, I think using hunspell is a good idea, as the vim dictionaries are derived from the OO ones and would otherwise waste a lot of space by duplicated data. Also worth mentioning, that this patch has been sent a year ago to upstream. While the idea has been appreciated, the patch has been rejected as is, AFAIK there has not been any work to improve this: http://www.mail-archive.com/vim-dev@vim.org/msg03252.html #21: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:54:06) Created an attachment (id=214116) Gnome spell enchant patch here is the latest and greatest patch wirtten by Szilveszter Farkas from Ubuntu community, however this is created for gnome-spell 1.0.7, maybe it could use for 1.0.8. #22: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:57:46) Rodrigo, could you check this patch to gnome-spell, please? https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=214116 Hopefully you are the maintainer for this packge. Many thanks, kalman #23: Stanislav Brabec (sbrabec) (2008-05-21 04:21:49) Patch applied (autogenerated files removed from it). #24: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-11 18:53:30) There's a ton of spelling tools, why could not it have used one of the previously packaged ones, aka aspell or ispell? #25: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 01:19:59) Jan, Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE. To answer your why's please read comment#1 #26: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-12 03:06:41)
Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE But was not in 10.3. Hence the question. comment#1 First comment says "Myspell". I asked about aspell/ispell.
#27: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 03:41:41) I think there are some reasons why choose Mozilla and OpenOffice.org and why Fedora decided as well, and slowly Ubuntu will go this way. In my comment#1 you should find the awesome summary: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary Hunspell is not a question, the question is when? #29: Andre Duffeck (aduffeck) (2009-02-26 10:10:45) There already is feature #305688: system wide spellchecker (hunspell) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305919
participants (1)
-
fate_noreply＠suse.de