[openFATE 306341] Show developer assigned information
Feature added by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Feature #306341, revision 1, last change by Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Feature #306341, revision 3 Title: Show developer assigned information - openFATE: Unconfirmed + openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) Feature #306341, revision 6 Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. + Discussion: + #3: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-14 16:33:16) + Showing the developer state as yes/no is definitly within the + boundaries set by our openfate_BV from 2009-01-31. I believe that + showing the Initials of the Developer in read-only mode should be okay + too. I can verify that, if needed -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Feature #306341, revision 7 Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. Discussion: #3: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-14 16:33:16) Showing the developer state as yes/no is definitly within the boundaries set by our openfate_BV from 2009-01-31. I believe that showing the Initials of the Developer in read-only mode should be okay too. I can verify that, if needed + #4: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-14 16:46:29) + Yes, please verify that. I think it would ease to get in contact with + the developer for interested peopel but imo we'd live without that as + the most important information is if there is a developer set or not. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Susanne Oberhauser (froh) Feature #306341, revision 8 Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important + Info Provider: R David Rahn (drahn) + Info Provider: Stig Flåskjer (sf) Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. Discussion: #3: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-14 16:33:16) Showing the developer state as yes/no is definitly within the boundaries set by our openfate_BV from 2009-01-31. I believe that showing the Initials of the Developer in read-only mode should be okay too. I can verify that, if needed #4: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-14 16:46:29) Yes, please verify that. I think it would ease to get in contact with the developer for interested peopel but imo we'd live without that as the most important information is if there is a developer set or not. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Susanne Oberhauser (froh) Feature #306341, revision 9 Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important - Info Provider: R David Rahn (drahn) - Info Provider: Stig Flåskjer (sf) Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. Discussion: #3: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-14 16:33:16) Showing the developer state as yes/no is definitly within the boundaries set by our openfate_BV from 2009-01-31. I believe that showing the Initials of the Developer in read-only mode should be okay too. I can verify that, if needed #4: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-14 16:46:29) Yes, please verify that. I think it would ease to get in contact with the developer for interested peopel but imo we'd live without that as the most important information is if there is a developer set or not. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Feature #306341, revision 10 Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. Discussion: #3: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-14 16:33:16) Showing the developer state as yes/no is definitly within the boundaries set by our openfate_BV from 2009-01-31. I believe that showing the Initials of the Developer in read-only mode should be okay too. I can verify that, if needed #4: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-14 16:46:29) Yes, please verify that. I think it would ease to get in contact with the developer for interested peopel but imo we'd live without that as the most important information is if there is a developer set or not. + #6: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-16 16:32:16) + Jürgen spoke with the workers council. The initials of the developers + are a no go for now. Displaying the "developer set" yes/no information + is no problem and I'd say for now sufficient. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) Feature #306341, revision 14 Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. Discussion: #3: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-14 16:33:16) Showing the developer state as yes/no is definitly within the boundaries set by our openfate_BV from 2009-01-31. I believe that showing the Initials of the Developer in read-only mode should be okay too. I can verify that, if needed #4: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-14 16:46:29) Yes, please verify that. I think it would ease to get in contact with the developer for interested peopel but imo we'd live without that as the most important information is if there is a developer set or not. #6: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-16 16:32:16) Jürgen spoke with the workers council. The initials of the developers are a no go for now. Displaying the "developer set" yes/no information is no problem and I'd say for now sufficient. #8: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-05-01 02:36:17) FWIW, this is also a usability issue: I clicked "Add myself as developer" and I couldn't see any change. I would say it's fine to display the name of people who explicitly set themselves as developers (as opposed to when management assigns a feature to a developer), isn't it? At least, it doesn't sound different from "Watch this feature" which lists your name... #9: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-05-01 10:03:29) (reply to #8) German Data Protection Law wants us to expose no work-related personal data unless there is a strong need to do so.I fully agree that it sucks usability-wise when an action has no apparent change. A developer: yes or maybe developer: yes(3) is never in conflict with that law, as it exposes no personal data. Watch-this feature, aka 'Interested: ...' was previously discussed by the council and the use of initials was suggested. Doing the same for developer requires starting another approval process first. I am ready to drive any such approval processes, but getting the language settled and all signed usually takes insane amounts of time. + #10: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-05-08 15:25:59) (reply to #9) + I wonder if we could try to get a flag in the openSUSE user management + (which is currently iChain and should evolve over time to something + more generic) that says: "Yes, I allow to make my contributions visible + under my name in the openSUSE ecosystems". That can everybody check if + he/she wants that and than we could display names etc. And if people + agree to that explicitely and without being forced, that is fine with + law. + And: It makes sense :-) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
Feature changed by: Thomas Schmidt (digitaltomm) Feature #306341, revision 15 Title: Show developer assigned information openFATE: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michael Löffler (michl19) Developer: (Novell) + Developer: (Novell) Description: Currently its not visible for community outside Novell if a developer is set or not. To ease community conribution this information needs to be visible outside the company as well. People then can find features where help is needed much easier and/or a call for contribution can be made. Discussion: #3: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-14 16:33:16) Showing the developer state as yes/no is definitly within the boundaries set by our openfate_BV from 2009-01-31. I believe that showing the Initials of the Developer in read-only mode should be okay too. I can verify that, if needed #4: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-14 16:46:29) Yes, please verify that. I think it would ease to get in contact with the developer for interested peopel but imo we'd live without that as the most important information is if there is a developer set or not. #6: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2009-04-16 16:32:16) Jürgen spoke with the workers council. The initials of the developers are a no go for now. Displaying the "developer set" yes/no information is no problem and I'd say for now sufficient. #8: Vincent Untz (vuntz) (2009-05-01 02:36:17) FWIW, this is also a usability issue: I clicked "Add myself as developer" and I couldn't see any change. I would say it's fine to display the name of people who explicitly set themselves as developers (as opposed to when management assigns a feature to a developer), isn't it? At least, it doesn't sound different from "Watch this feature" which lists your name... #9: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-05-01 10:03:29) (reply to #8) German Data Protection Law wants us to expose no work-related personal data unless there is a strong need to do so.I fully agree that it sucks usability-wise when an action has no apparent change. A developer: yes or maybe developer: yes(3) is never in conflict with that law, as it exposes no personal data. Watch-this feature, aka 'Interested: ...' was previously discussed by the council and the use of initials was suggested. Doing the same for developer requires starting another approval process first. I am ready to drive any such approval processes, but getting the language settled and all signed usually takes insane amounts of time. #10: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) (2009-05-08 15:25:59) (reply to #9) I wonder if we could try to get a flag in the openSUSE user management (which is currently iChain and should evolve over time to something more generic) that says: "Yes, I allow to make my contributions visible under my name in the openSUSE ecosystems". That can everybody check if he/she wants that and than we could display names etc. And if people agree to that explicitely and without being forced, that is fine with law. And: It makes sense :-) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306341
participants (1)
-
fate_noreply＠suse.de