[opensuse-factory] the next staging project: giflib5
Hi, Is anyone interested in fixing the 10 packages needing an update for giflib5? I set up openSUSE:Factory:Staging:giflib5 after reverting the update in openSUSE:Factory and will add maintainers happily. But all packages in there are branches of the devel project, so just submit the fixes to the devel project. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 12.03.2013 12:58, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in fixing the 10 packages needing an update for giflib5?
I'll fix them. After all, I sneaked in the giflib update :-) (via an "autoconf-1.13 buildfix")
I set up openSUSE:Factory:Staging:giflib5 after reverting the update in openSUSE:Factory and will add maintainers happily. But all packages in there are branches of the devel project, so just submit the fixes to the devel project. -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 12.03.2013 16:26, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Am 12.03.2013 12:58, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in fixing the 10 packages needing an update for giflib5?
I'll fix them. After all, I sneaked in the giflib update :-) (via an "autoconf-1.13 buildfix")
Thanks. Let me know when I can accept giflib again :) Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 12.03.2013 16:26, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
Am 12.03.2013 12:58, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in fixing the 10 packages needing an update for giflib5?
I'll fix them. After all, I sneaked in the giflib update :-) (via an "autoconf-1.13 buildfix")
kate is a false positive. This is kate's problem: [ 214s] -- Found SIP version: 4.14.4 [ 214s] -- Found PyQt4 version: 4.10 [ 214s] -- Found PyKDE4 version 4.10.00 /usr/share/sip/PyKDE4 [ 214s] CMake Warning at kate/plugins/pate/CMakeLists.txt:61 (message): [ 214s] Pate plugin needs PyQT 4.3.1 or later. I don't think it is related to giflib5. => someone needs to fix the braindead version check. I hope that someone is not me, since I could only try to fix it by completely removing cmake from the equation :-) -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 12.03.2013 17:27, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
Am 12.03.2013 16:26, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
Am 12.03.2013 12:58, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in fixing the 10 packages needing an update for giflib5?
I'll fix them. After all, I sneaked in the giflib update :-) (via an "autoconf-1.13 buildfix")
kate is a false positive. This is kate's problem:
[ 214s] -- Found SIP version: 4.14.4 [ 214s] -- Found PyQt4 version: 4.10 [ 214s] -- Found PyKDE4 version 4.10.00 /usr/share/sip/PyKDE4 [ 214s] CMake Warning at kate/plugins/pate/CMakeLists.txt:61 (message): [ 214s] Pate plugin needs PyQT 4.3.1 or later.
I don't think it is related to giflib5.
=> someone needs to fix the braindead version check. I hope that someone is not me, since I could only try to fix it by completely removing cmake from the equation :-)
True. I just linked all current build failures that buildrequire giflib. Sorry. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 12.03.2013 16:26, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
Am 12.03.2013 12:58, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in fixing the 10 packages needing an update for giflib5?
I'll fix them. After all, I sneaked in the giflib update :-) (via an "autoconf-1.13 buildfix")
Done. SR's 158800-158806 and 158835 gnash is broken beyond repair. I fixed two issues besides giflib5 and then it still fails the rpmlint test with a buffer overflow. I SR'ed it in the current state, since this is way out of scope of this Hackathon. The KDE guys don't want my fixes, because the patches are not annotated (no other patch in the spec file is annotated). I will not write here what I would like to say to them. Libreoffice: I did not touch this. Probably the fixes are trivial, but 10+ hours of build time: this clearly needs to be done by someone who has a local build set up to test this or it will take forever. Everything else should be fine, kdenetwork4 and kdelibs4 probably just should be dropped before accepting the giflib update :-) -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 13.03.2013 12:09, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
Am 12.03.2013 16:26, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
Am 12.03.2013 12:58, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in fixing the 10 packages needing an update for giflib5?
I'll fix them. After all, I sneaked in the giflib update :-) (via an "autoconf-1.13 buildfix")
Done.
SR's 158800-158806 and 158835
gnash is broken beyond repair. I fixed two issues besides giflib5 and then it still fails the rpmlint test with a buffer overflow.
I SR'ed it in the current state, since this is way out of scope of this Hackathon.
The KDE guys don't want my fixes, because the patches are not annotated (no other patch in the spec file is annotated). I will not write here what I would like to say to them. I already said it.
Libreoffice: I did not touch this. Probably the fixes are trivial, but 10+ hours of build time: this clearly needs to be done by someone who has a local build set up to test this or it will take forever.
Everything else should be fine, kdenetwork4 and kdelibs4 probably just should be dropped before accepting the giflib update :-)
Yeah, that will have to happen I'm afraid. But possibly KDE upstream sees the light and the next version update makes it valid again. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Update... Am 13.03.2013 12:09, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
Am 12.03.2013 16:26, schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
SR's 158800-158806 and 158835
Dominique told me he will not take "my" tracker 0.15, because tracker-0.15 will come with next GNOME update. He'll put in the patch into tracker-0.15. -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
El 13/03/13 08:09, Stefan Seyfried escribió: ¿
The KDE guys don't want my fixes, because the patches are not annotated (no other patch in the spec file is annotated). I will not write here what I would like to say to them.
That's because well.. you know.. now bureaucracy is more important than 500 packages failing.. priorities, ladies and gentleman. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
That's because well.. you know.. now bureaucracy is more important than 500 packages failing.. priorities, ladies and gentleman. let us stop it here... the rules on documenting patches and changes were around for a while nobody was strict with them...
and if you think kde people are paranoid... try to submit to gnome... regards, Alin
-- Without Questions there are no Answers!
Alin Marin ELENA Advanced Molecular Simulation Research Laboratory School of Physics, University College Dublin ---- Ardionsamblú Móilíneach Saotharlann Taighde Scoil na Fisice, An Coláiste Ollscoile, Baile Átha Cliath ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://alin.elenaworld.net ______________________________________________________________________ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Alin M Elena
That's because well.. you know.. now bureaucracy is more important than 500 packages failing.. priorities, ladies and gentleman. let us stop it here... the rules on documenting patches and changes were around for a while nobody was strict with them...
and if you think kde people are paranoid... try to submit to gnome...
hi DID submit to GNOME:Factory... And, as all patches in GNOME:* ARE tagged, he also tagged them, following what is custom in the project at the time he submitted... A very fair point.. (ok, I still did not accept the SR, but not due to tagging issues, but merely because I've been working the last 6 months on staging GNOME 3.8 and did not feel like breaking this efforts and having to rebase for a minimal patch... which by now also is integrated on this code base of course). Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
The KDE guys don't want my fixes, because the patches are not annotated (no other patch in the spec file is annotated). I will not write here what I would like to say to them.
That's because well.. you know.. now bureaucracy is more important than 500 packages failing.. priorities, ladies and gentleman.
Why not reopen the SR with "Sorry, no time to do that, feel free to tag after accepting" or something like that? Then the maintainer on the receiving end can decide whether it's worth the effort. AFAIUI, the initial rejection is a "please, tag". -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 13.03.2013 16:43, schrieb Claudio Freire:
Why not reopen the SR with "Sorry, no time to do that, feel free to tag after accepting" or something like that? Then the maintainer on the receiving end can decide whether it's worth the effort.
Just look for yourself, its requests 158804 and 158805. -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Seyfried
Why not reopen the SR with "Sorry, no time to do that, feel free to tag after accepting" or something like that? Then the maintainer on the receiving end can decide whether it's worth the effort.
Just look for yourself, its requests 158804 and 158805.
I see... I like your answer ;-) Still... isn't kdelibs4 quite critical? How come it's "droppable"? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 13.03.2013 16:38, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
That's because well.. you know.. now bureaucracy is more important than 500 packages failing.. priorities, ladies and gentleman.
I actually did annotate those patches in the packages that already had annotated patches, trying to do it the same style like the rest of the package. (I actually chose the wrong annotation for tracker as Dominique pointed out to me, and that's something I would surely have been happy to fix. In the end it sorted itself differently. The difference is that "old" patches in the tracker package were already annotated, so I was just natural to annotate mine, too) The packages in question had 30 patches already, all unannotated. But well, I won't really miss kdelibs4 nor kdenetwork4 :-) -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hello, Am Mittwoch, 13. März 2013 schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
That's because well.. you know.. now bureaucracy is more important than 500 packages failing.. priorities, ladies and gentleman.
Well, bureaucracy can really hurt - unfortunately it sometimes hurts people who are not even involved in the paperwork ;-) Recently AJ declined a SR from me to Factory because I didn't mention the name of the newly added patch in the .changes. The end result (besides fixing the .changes) was that I opened two new bugreports - one because osc didn't offer to supersede the first SR [1] and one because Hermes doesn't add a charset header to the mails it sends [2] ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz, BBfH [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807621 [2] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807625 -- Vor einer ganzen Weile war ich zu einem Kurs über Linux. An den PC's gab es zu meinem Entsetzen keine Maus - nix mit herumklicken in KDE oder so - nur tippen in der shell. Damals habe ich mich geärgert aber heute finde ich das war das beste was mir passieren konnte. Nur wer das Alphabet kennt kann ein Buch lesen. [Torsten Seeboth in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 12:09:42 Stefan Seyfried wrote:
The KDE guys don't want my fixes, because the patches are not annotated (no other patch in the spec file is annotated). I will not write here what I would like to say to them.
Stefan, I would very much appreciate your patches for giflib5. However your request would have caused some issues as that we just moved KDE 4.10.1 from KR410 to KDF and therefore your patch would have become obsolete due to the source package changes. As I also said already is that the KDE team is indeed not consistent with regards to the usage of the annotation and the most important thing for me is that adding or deleting of patches is mentioned in the spec-file. I apologize if this caused a grievance, but I would like to ask you to submit it again, but this time against the updated package in KDF (now 4.10.1). We will also discuss this matter within the upcoming KDE team meeting. Thanks Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 13.03.2013 19:59, schrieb Raymond Wooninck:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 12:09:42 Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Stefan, I would very much appreciate your patches for giflib5. However your request would have caused some issues as that we just moved KDE 4.10.1 from KR410 to KDF and therefore your patch would have become obsolete due to the source package changes.
They are already updated and building, however I have set up an additional project to check they also keep building with the old giflib (the kdelibs4 giflib5 fix unexpectedly broke that). Once everything is building, I'll resubmit them.
As I also said already is that the KDE team is indeed not consistent with regards to the usage of the annotation and the most important thing for me is that adding or deleting of patches is mentioned in the spec-file.
I have no problem putting the patch tag in (even though I might have problems selecting the correct tag :-), however I'd suggest some common sense: if there is not a single tag present for 30 old patches, well, don't expect people to know that they are suddenly mandatory :-)
I apologize if this caused a grievance, but I would like to ask you to submit it again, but this time against the updated package in KDF (now 4.10.1).
I'll submit it tomorrow morning if all builds well. Best regards, seife -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (8)
-
Alin M Elena -
Christian Boltz -
Claudio Freire -
Cristian Rodríguez -
Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar -
Raymond Wooninck -
Stefan Seyfried -
Stephan Kulow