[opensuse-factory] dikigam 5.1
Hi, are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1? thanks, m. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto:
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
Only if upstream has implemented a configuration migration from the old kdelibs based version. That is why we aren't updating it (because it would lose all configuration data).
On 09/19/2016, 09:42 AM, Luca Beltrame wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto:
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
Only if upstream has implemented a configuration migration from the old kdelibs based version. That is why we aren't updating it (because it would lose all configuration data).
Given this is the second buddy to ask, can we have a separate digikam5 package then? I think people are mostly able to configure the app again (took me 30 seconds at most). Needless to say, digikam4 does not work for me reliably. thanks, -- js suse labs
Am 19.09.2016 um 15:58 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
On 09/19/2016, 09:42 AM, Luca Beltrame wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto:
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
Only if upstream has implemented a configuration migration from the old kdelibs based version. That is why we aren't updating it (because it would lose all configuration data).
Given this is the second buddy to ask, [...]
Here is the third! cu Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 15:58:23 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
Given this is the second buddy to ask, can we have a separate digikam5 package then? I think people are mostly able to configure the app again (took me 30 seconds at most).
5.1.0 is available in KDE:Extra, if you want to have it. That said, IMHO we could actually submit 5.1.0 to Tumbleweed maybe, it does display a dialog on first start that tells the user about this and how to copy the configuration. And there's no migration necessary for the database IIANM. OTOH, we should rather wait for 5.2.0 anyway, which is about to be released soon AFAIK.
Needless to say, digikam4 does not work for me reliably.
Why is that "needless to say"? How exactly does it not work reliably? Kind Regards, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:13:14 +0200 Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> ha scritto:
OTOH, we should rather wait for 5.2.0 anyway, which is about to be released soon AFAIK.
This is probably the best course of action. I'll try to update the package when 5.2 is out if no one else beats me to it first. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B
Il giorno Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:12:34 +0200 Luca Beltrame <lbeltrame@kde.org> ha scritto:
This is probably the best course of action. I'll try to update the package when 5.2 is out if no one else beats me to it first.
Digikam 5.2.0 has been submitted to Factory: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/429966 -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B
On 09/19/2016, 04:13 PM, Wolfgang Bauer wrote:
Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 15:58:23 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
Given this is the second buddy to ask, can we have a separate digikam5 package then? I think people are mostly able to configure the app again (took me 30 seconds at most).
5.1.0 is available in KDE:Extra, if you want to have it.
That said, IMHO we could actually submit 5.1.0 to Tumbleweed maybe, it does display a dialog on first start that tells the user about this and how to copy the configuration. And there's no migration necessary for the database IIANM.
OTOH, we should rather wait for 5.2.0 anyway, which is about to be released soon AFAIK.
Ok, fair enough.
Needless to say, digikam4 does not work for me reliably.
Why is that "needless to say"? How exactly does it not work reliably?
I use digikam primarily for inserting a geolocation. And the plugin for 4.0 is broken. Google maps do not render when panning etc. It uses some old API I would say, because in 5.0 the buttons in the map look differently. thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2016, 11:44:12 CEST schrieb Jiri Slaby:
I use digikam primarily for inserting a geolocation. And the plugin for 4.0 is broken. Google maps do not render when panning etc. It uses some old API I would say, because in 5.0 the buttons in the map look differently.
Ah this. Yes, digikam4 (being a KDE4 application) uses the KDE4/Qt4 based libmarblewidget for this (which we still ship). I think the problem here is that this cannot load the map data and/or plugins from the KF5 based marble. I'm not sure this would be fixable though. We maybe could provide a marble4 package with the conflicting parts (e.g. the application itself) removed, but it's probably not worth the effort any more (for Tumbleweed at least). Kind Regards, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 09/21/2016, 01:31 PM, Wolfgang Bauer wrote:
I'm not sure this would be fixable though. We maybe could provide a marble4 package with the conflicting parts (e.g. the application itself) removed, but it's probably not worth the effort any more (for Tumbleweed at least).
Not at all, I would say. I may be the only user of this and I switched to working digikam 5 anyway :). thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto: Hello,
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
A quick update: digikam 5.2 has been accepted into Tumbleweed, and thanks to the heroic effort of Antonio Larrosa, we have a migration in place, once the following request lands in Tumbleweed: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/432953
On 03/10/16 15:42, Luca Beltrame wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto:
Hello,
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
A quick update: digikam 5.2 has been accepted into Tumbleweed, and thanks to the heroic effort of Antonio Larrosa, we have a migration in place, once the following request lands in Tumbleweed:
Btw, note that the migration also fixes the album roots in the digikam database for digikam 5, so if someone upgraded and created new configuration files but can't see his/her picture collection, I would recommend to remove the new digikam 5 config files (this will of course lose the changes done if any) and then run the new (patched) digikam 5.2.0 package when it's available to do a proper migration. To remove the digikam5 config files, users should do: rm ~/.config/digikam* rm -Rf ~/.local/share/digikam -- Antonio Larrosa -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 03.10.2016 um 15:42 schrieb Luca Beltrame:
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto:
Hello,
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
A quick update: digikam 5.2 has been accepted into Tumbleweed, and thanks to the heroic effort of Antonio Larrosa, we have a migration in place, once the following request lands in Tumbleweed:
Great Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 03.10.2016 um 15:42 schrieb Luca Beltrame:
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto:
Hello,
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
A quick update: digikam 5.2 has been accepted into Tumbleweed, and thanks to the heroic effort of Antonio Larrosa, we have a migration in place, once the following request lands in Tumbleweed:
Digikam migration successfully completed (on my computer). Thanks Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Il giorno Tue, 4 Oct 2016 17:34:32 +0200 Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> ha scritto:
Digikam migration successfully completed (on my computer).
Thanks for the follow up (and for playing the guinea pig ;).
On Mon, Oct 03, Luca Beltrame wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 Michal Hlavac <miso@hlavki.eu> ha scritto:
Hello,
are there any plans do upgrade to digikam 5.1?
A quick update: digikam 5.2 has been accepted into Tumbleweed, and thanks to the heroic effort of Antonio Larrosa, we have a migration in place, once the following request lands in Tumbleweed:
Migration does not seem to work, this is reported every two seconds: ... Oct 18 11:51:20 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.general: Config file "/home/olaf/.kde4/share/apps/digikam/kipiplugin_yandexfotkiui.rc" was migrated to "/home/olaf/.local/share/digikam/kipiplugin_yandexfotkiui.rc" Oct 18 11:51:20 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: QSqlDatabase: driver not loaded Oct 18 11:51:20 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: QSqlDatabase: available drivers: QSQLITE QSQLITE3 QMYSQL QMYSQL3 Oct 18 11:51:20 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.general: Cannot open database: "Driver not loaded Driver not loaded" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.general: AlbumWatch use QFileSystemWatcher Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: QFileSystemWatcher::removePaths: list is empty Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.general: Database Parameters: Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Type: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: DB Core Name: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: DB Thumbs Name: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: DB Face Name: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Connect Options: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Host Name: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Host port: -1 Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Internal Server: false Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Internal Server Path: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Internal Server Serv Cmd: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Internal Server Init Cmd: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Username: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: Password: "" Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.coredb: Core database: please set parameters before setting a database error handler Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: QSqlDatabase: driver not loaded Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: QSqlDatabase: available drivers: QSQLITE QSQLITE3 QMYSQL QMYSQL3 Oct 18 11:51:21 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.dbengine: Error while opening the database. Error details [ QSqlError("", "Driver not loaded", "Driver not loaded") ] ... Oct 18 11:56:58 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.dbengine: Error while opening the database. Error details [ QSqlError("", "Driver not loaded", "Driver not loaded") ] Olaf
Am Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2016, 12:09:10 schrieb Olaf Hering:
Oct 18 11:56:58 probook org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1899]: digikam.dbengine: Error while opening the database. Error details [ QSqlError("", "Driver not loaded", "Driver not loaded") ]
Not sure if this is actually related to the migration. Apparently digikam fails to load the database driver. What driver is set? grep Database ~/.config/digikamrc What drivers do you have installed? rpm -qa libQt5Sql* Kind Regards, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (7)
-
Antonio Larrosa -
Jiri Slaby -
Luca Beltrame -
Michal Hlavac -
Olaf Hering -
Peter Mc Donough -
Wolfgang Bauer