https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.3-XFS-Metadata-Corrupt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208553
If there's an update waiting to be released, then it should be kept back.
On 2023-05-26 20:15, Adam Mizerski wrote:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.3-XFS-Metadata-Corrupt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208553
If there's an update waiting to be released, then it should be kept back.
Can't be, XFS is stable and better than btrfs, that's what the internet has been telling me for years now...
/sarcasm
Thanks for the heads up
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1089175 is in staging J, but at time of writing it's building, so there's no chance of it being released any time soon https://build.opensuse.org/staging_workflows/openSUSE:Factory/staging_projec...
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
I've commented on the SR to make sure the kernel maintainers consider what the best move is.
Am 26.05.23 um 20:48 schrieb Richard Brown:
On 2023-05-26 20:15, Adam Mizerski wrote:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.3-XFS-Metadata-Corrupt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208553
If there's an update waiting to be released, then it should be kept back.
Can't be, XFS is stable and better than btrfs, that's what the internet has been telling me for years now...
/sarcasm
Thanks for the heads up
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1089175 is in staging J, but at time of writing it's building, so there's no chance of it being released any time soon https://build.opensuse.org/staging_workflows/openSUSE:Factory/staging_projec...
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
I've commented on the SR to make sure the kernel maintainers consider what the best move is.
JFYI: I am not experiencing any metadata corruption issues on the XFS file system with kernel 6.3.4.
Regards, Frank
Am 26.05.23 um 21:04 schrieb Frank Krüger:
Am 26.05.23 um 20:48 schrieb Richard Brown:
On 2023-05-26 20:15, Adam Mizerski wrote:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.3-XFS-Metadata-Corrupt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208553
If there's an update waiting to be released, then it should be kept back.
Can't be, XFS is stable and better than btrfs, that's what the internet has been telling me for years now...
/sarcasm
Thanks for the heads up
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1089175 is in staging J, but at time of writing it's building, so there's no chance of it being released any time soon https://build.opensuse.org/staging_workflows/openSUSE:Factory/staging_projec...
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
I've commented on the SR to make sure the kernel maintainers consider what the best move is.
FYI: Fix will be available for 6.3.3 and 6.3.4, cf. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1089502. Thanks to RB and JS. See also https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg72210.html for more details.
Regards, Frank
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 9:48 PM Richard Brown rbrown@suse.de wrote:
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
Running with 6.3.2 and 2 xfs mounts, so far so good with heavily daily usage. Seems to affect more but not only, hardware controllers and mostly on stripe raid.
Richard Brown writes:
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
So, I thought I could get the kernel 6.2.12 back via tumbleweed-cli, but of course it's already expired (would have been in 20230422). Any other options?
Regards, Achim.
Btrfs snapshot assuming you have it enabled?
On May 27, 2023, at 1:01 AM, ASSI Stromeko@nexgo.de wrote:
Richard Brown writes:
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
So, I thought I could get the kernel 6.2.12 back via tumbleweed-cli, but of course it's already expired (would have been in 20230422). Any other options?
Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Waldorf MIDI Implementation & additional documentation: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfDocs
On 27/5/23 08:01, ASSI wrote:
Richard Brown writes:
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
So, I thought I could get the kernel 6.2.12 back via tumbleweed-cli, but of course it's already expired (would have been in 20230422). Any other options?
Regards, Achim.
kernel-6.2.12 (x86_64) looks available here http://download.opensuse.org/history/20230505/tumbleweed/repo/oss/x86_64/
(You'll have to download the rpm packages manually)
Regards, Ahmad Samir
Hi ASSI,
The 6.2.12 kernel is available in 20230505 still, just download from the history builds, here's the link
https://download.opensuse.org/history/20230505/tumbleweed/repo/oss/x86_64/ke...
Joe
On 5/27/23 01:01, ASSI wrote:
Richard Brown writes:
That said, the redhat bug report suggests it happens with the kernel version we already have out..so maybe moving forward would be the best thing to do.
So, I thought I could get the kernel 6.2.12 back via tumbleweed-cli, but of course it's already expired (would have been in 20230422). Any other options?
Regards, Achim.
-
Adam Mizerski -
Ahmad Samir -
ASSI -
Emanuel Castelo -
Frank Krüger -
Joe Salmeri -
Richard Brown -
Stratos Zolotas