Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/S... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-11/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211231/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14268 (+5) build-tried: 14238 (+5) build-failed: 31 (-3) build-n-a: 296 (+9) build-succeeded: 13911 (-1) build-official-failed+na: 36 (-18) build-compare-failed: 406 (+9) build-compare-succeeded: 13505 (-10) verify-failed: 454 (-5) verified-semi-reproducible: 13134 (-54) bit-by-bit-identical: 13467 (+39) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 440 (-38) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 444 (-40) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211231/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211231/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 5 were in ring0 35 were in ring1 That makes it 40/3247 => 1.23 % which is below the overall average of 406/13911 => 2.92 % 440/13911 => 3.16 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible unreproducible packages in ring0(bootstrap): bison PGO+parallelism gcc10 PGO grep PGO? pam PDF/date python38 PGO Ciao Bernhard M.