Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-11/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201231/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 13841 (+132) build-tried: 13830 (+132) build-failed: 32 (-3) build-n-a: 129 (+0) build-succeeded: 13669 (+135) build-official-failed+na: 169 (-20) build-compare-failed: 423 (+6) build-compare-succeeded: 13246 (+129) verify-failed: 511 (-7) verified-semi-reproducible: 12784 (+0) bit-by-bit-identical: 13119 (+129) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 550 (+13) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 550 (+6) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201231/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201231/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 50 were in ring1 That makes it 53/3247 => 1.63 % which is below the overall average of 423/13669 => 3.09 % 550/13669 => 4.02 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/634 added the option to have a filesystem with deterministic readdir order and Dominique enabled it in Factory some weeks ago, so packages such as cargo-c, gcompris, qt6* are now verifiable. This can benefit up to 111 packages, though several of them still have other issues to solve. Newly unreproducible core packages: qemu assembler diffs ; needs debugging Ciao Bernhard M.