[opensuse-factory] Status: M3
Hi, I wish I had better news, but this week didn't prove good for a Milestone. libreoffice still doesn't build and several applications are broken with new boost - which makes other apps uninstallable too. I just don't want to release a milestone with this ;( But that means someone else has to release Milestone 3, I'll be on vacation next week. But as in the past my hopes that someone will actually care enough are low ;( Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi Stephan, can you pass a list with the apps broken with boost? maybe volunteers would fix them during the weekend... regards, Alin On 4 April 2012 09:13, Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> wrote:
Hi,
I wish I had better news, but this week didn't prove good for a Milestone. libreoffice still doesn't build and several applications are broken with new boost - which makes other apps uninstallable too. I just don't want to release a milestone with this ;(
But that means someone else has to release Milestone 3, I'll be on vacation next week. But as in the past my hopes that someone will actually care enough are low ;(
Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04.04.2012 11:02, Alin Marin Elena wrote:
Hi Stephan,
can you pass a list with the apps broken with boost? maybe volunteers would fix them during the weekend...
Volunteers can always check the factory status page - I'm always trying to keep the reason for breakage as uptodate as possible. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 11:44:18 Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 04.04.2012 11:02, Alin Marin Elena wrote:
Hi Stephan,
can you pass a list with the apps broken with boost? maybe volunteers would fix them during the weekend...
Volunteers can always check the factory status page - I'm always trying to keep the reason for breakage as uptodate as possible.
Here's the URL for the status page: https://build.opensuse.org/project/status?project=openSUSE%3AFactory Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:
Volunteers can always check the factory status page - I'm always trying to keep the reason for breakage as uptodate as possible.
Here's the URL for the status page:
https://build.opensuse.org/project/status?project=openSUSE%3AFactory
I think x11vnc and openssh-askpass-gnome only need a rebuild. I just branched them to check them out, and they built just fine without modification. Curious thing though, "openssh-askpass-gnome" was branched (with the webui) as "openssh". What's up with that? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le mercredi 04 avril 2012, à 11:56 -0300, Claudio Freire a écrit :
Curious thing though, "openssh-askpass-gnome" was branched (with the webui) as "openssh". What's up with that?
That's because the openssh-askpass-gnome package is actually a link to openssh, so when doing changes to openssh-askpass-gnome, you actually need to change the openssh package. Or in obs terms: $ osc meta pkg openSUSE:Factory openssh-askpass-gnome|grep "<devel" <devel project="openSUSE:Factory" package="openssh"/> Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
I think x11vnc and openssh-askpass-gnome only need a rebuild. I just branched them to check them out, and they built just fine without modification.
graphviz-plugins is another. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/04/2012 05:44 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Claudio Freire<klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
I think x11vnc and openssh-askpass-gnome only need a rebuild. I just branched them to check them out, and they built just fine without modification.
graphviz-plugins is another.
It might be that the packages was fixed in the devel project but not submitted yet to Factory. If that's the case - check e.g. with osc rdiff, feel free to submit the package from the devel project to openSUSE:Factory, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:
It might be that the packages was fixed in the devel project but not submitted yet to Factory.
If that's the case - check e.g. with osc rdiff, feel free to submit the package from the devel project to openSUSE:Factory,
graphviz already has a pending SR - graphviz-plugins would be fixed indirectly... right? (otherwise I can submit -plugins which has no SR) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/04/2012 08:47 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Andreas Jaeger<aj@suse.com> wrote:
It might be that the packages was fixed in the devel project but not submitted yet to Factory.
If that's the case - check e.g. with osc rdiff, feel free to submit the package from the devel project to openSUSE:Factory,
graphviz already has a pending SR - graphviz-plugins would be fixed indirectly... right?
(otherwise I can submit -plugins which has no SR)
Yes, that should be fine since graphviz-plugins and graphviz are in the same directory, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/04/2012 05:44 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Claudio Freire<klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
I think x11vnc and openssh-askpass-gnome only need a rebuild. I just branched them to check them out, and they built just fine without modification.
graphviz-plugins is another.
It might be that the packages was fixed in the devel project but not submitted yet to Factory. If that's the case - check e.g. with osc rdiff, feel free to submit the package from the devel project to openSUSE:Factory, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> wrote:
Volunteers can always check the factory status page - I'm always trying to keep the reason for breakage as uptodate as possible.
I managed to fix the problem with python3-rpm, namely that it's using an API that has been deprecated since 2.7, and factory's python3 seems to have finally removed it. I replaced this API call (PyCObject_AsVoidPtr and FromVoidPtr) with the advertised replacement Capsule API, but I'm unsure how to test it. The package builds in my home branch[0], but it doesn't seem to have any unit tests, and I haven't used python3-rpm so I don't know how to test. Any help is welcome. [0] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=python3-rpm&project=home%3Ak... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> wrote:
Volunteers can always check the factory status page - I'm always trying to keep the reason for breakage as uptodate as possible.
I managed to fix the problem with python3-rpm, namely that it's using an API that has been deprecated since 2.7, and factory's python3 seems to have finally removed it. I replaced this API call (PyCObject_AsVoidPtr and FromVoidPtr) with the advertised replacement Capsule API, but I'm unsure how to test it.
Should I just submit? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:13, Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> wrote:
But that means someone else has to release Milestone 3, I'll be on vacation next week. But as in the past my hopes that someone will actually care enough are low ;(
I don't think it's so much that no one cares enough... I like to think that it's more like the vast majority of us haven't had the time to learn the release mechanisms well enough to be confident of stepping up and saying "I'll do it". :-( I know for sure that's the case for me... you'd be back from vacation before I managed to issue a release of M3. C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi; On 04/04/2012 10:13 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
I wish I had better news, but this week didn't prove good for a Milestone. libreoffice still doesn't build and several applications are broken with new boost - which makes other apps uninstallable too. I just don't want to release a milestone with this ;(
libreoffice is fixed in the devel project, an auto-submit would make sense I guess. Regards. - -- Ismail Dönmez - openSUSE Booster SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPfCnWAAoJEJrs5hT7LFEcm1kIAKskzbPq591MMt3U6/ZvoTSF KVEcvHiwpsNrFOXl1JEztSTYN+pYDYZKYsDFt2wwle0p+luNlN4gG1yGZJQKW4nr j/dl9JaUSyrmZ19LZ+qDDCujfWtcl4PcPxnbYo+z0uKKG5DtUMOW9e2XxuHFe383 Y0RCsuanNDQcjUf1AmpCQkXnLEjGrzmUArCKRgEzNfTXp8k4o46jc84eSZwPVuAW ZJCeX+tcA1tU14WaiVLqoOiAZgQmQ7cdtUfR87OpdVKtfxWue+eW9EL0GjQ++nzu 9hv6aS6WHOA9cVhzHPPD6egI5+qSpzmxHXUSYg9+pAI1/weZS0lqdgfvamLkjA4= =wtlG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/04/2012 10:13 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
I wish I had better news, but this week didn't prove good for a Milestone. libreoffice still doesn't build and several applications are broken with new boost - which makes other apps uninstallable too. I just don't want to release a milestone with this ;(
But that means someone else has to release Milestone 3, I'll be on vacation next week. But as in the past my hopes that someone will actually care enough are low ;(
Coolo, there are many that care ;), so enjoy your vacation! Since you fixed the x86-64 DVD - at least for my tests - I'll check on Tuesday that everything is ready for release and target Wednesday as release of M3, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:13:43 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
I wish I had better news, but this week didn't prove good for a Milestone. libreoffice still doesn't build and several applications are broken with new boost - which makes other apps uninstallable too. I just don't want to release a milestone with this ;(
But that means someone else has to release Milestone 3, I'll be on vacation next week. But as in the past my hopes that someone will actually care enough are low ;(
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Andreas Jaeger schrieb:
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them.
BTW, what's up with the X.org update? I thought we'd want to get 1.12 into 12.2, but even though that one has been released upstream, it's still not even in X11:Xorg, let alone Factory. :( Robert Kaiser -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi, Le mardi 10 avril 2012, à 14:50 +0200, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
Andreas Jaeger schrieb:
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them.
BTW, what's up with the X.org update? I thought we'd want to get 1.12 into 12.2, but even though that one has been released upstream, it's still not even in X11:Xorg, let alone Factory. :(
That's a good question. There are at least one major issue in GNOME right now that I think would get fixed with a new xorg, and I was assuming we'll get the new xorg. Is it blocked for a technical reason, or simply because nobody had time for the update so far? I'm sure we can find people to help if it's just a time issue :-) Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:41:30 Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Le mardi 10 avril 2012, à 14:50 +0200, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
Andreas Jaeger schrieb:
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them.
BTW, what's up with the X.org update? I thought we'd want to get 1.12 into 12.2, but even though that one has been released upstream, it's still not even in X11:Xorg, let alone Factory. :(
That's a good question. There are at least one major issue in GNOME right now that I think would get fixed with a new xorg, and I was assuming we'll get the new xorg.
Is it blocked for a technical reason, or simply because nobody had time for the update so far? I'm sure we can find people to help if it's just a time issue :-)
Stefan wants to do it but has not had time for it yet. So, if somebody steps up and helps, I expect Stefan would be happy about it, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2012/04/11 15:11 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Stefan wants to do it but has not had time for it yet.
New Xorg got into 12.1 rather late too. Did it or other things pile on Stefan's already full plate due to the not so recent any more rounds of paid staff reductions, maybe mfabian?
So, if somebody steps up and helps, I expect Stefan would be happy about it,
What would be involved to "step up" for someone who has never built or packaged before? Wouldn't Xorg be more involved than lower profile packages? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>:
On 2012/04/11 15:11 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Stefan wants to do it but has not had time for it yet.
New Xorg got into 12.1 rather late too. Did it or other things pile on Stefan's already full plate due to the not so recent any more rounds of paid staff reductions, maybe mfabian?
So, if somebody steps up and helps, I expect Stefan would be happy about it,
What would be involved to "step up" for someone who has never built or packaged before? Wouldn't Xorg be more involved than lower profile packages?
I think it's absolutely not a beginners package. In order to work on this you either need moderate knowledge on packaging or, more importantly, knowledge about x11 itself (starting with where to find the sources :) ) The package is one of the 'tops' when it comes to the number of patches... of which probably a bunch can be dropped now; blindly dropping them on the other hand is not a good move neither... which results in 'checking every single one' for it's use, understanding it, and possibly rebasing on top of the new xorg 1.12. If you like challenges, then it's surely a good and rewarding one! (Rewarding by means of getting our thanks, and having the good feeling of success) Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:51:23AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
Quoting Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>:
On 2012/04/11 15:11 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Stefan wants to do it but has not had time for it yet.
New Xorg got into 12.1 rather late too. Did it or other things pile on Stefan's already full plate due to the not so recent any more rounds of paid staff reductions, maybe mfabian?
So, if somebody steps up and helps, I expect Stefan would be happy about it,
What would be involved to "step up" for someone who has never built or packaged before? Wouldn't Xorg be more involved than lower profile packages?
I think it's absolutely not a beginners package. In order to work on this you either need moderate knowledge on packaging or, more importantly, knowledge about x11 itself (starting with where to find the sources :) )
The package is one of the 'tops' when it comes to the number of patches... of which probably a bunch can be dropped now; blindly dropping them on the other hand is not a good move neither... which results in 'checking every single one' for it's use, understanding it, and possibly rebasing on top of the new xorg 1.12.
I can only second this. Updating xorg-x11-server packages is mainly about adjusting patches (still a bunch are not upstreamed yet; some like the VNC patches can never be upstreamed!). Second part is doing the required lib package updates, when xorg-server fails due to an outdated lib (which is mostly trivial). Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dnia środa, 11 kwietnia 2012 16:07:03 Stefan Dirsch pisze:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:51:23AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
Quoting Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>:
On 2012/04/11 15:11 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Stefan wants to do it but has not had time for it yet.
New Xorg got into 12.1 rather late too. Did it or other things pile on Stefan's already full plate due to the not so recent any more rounds of paid staff reductions, maybe mfabian?
So, if somebody steps up and helps, I expect Stefan would be happy about it,> > What would be involved to "step up" for someone who has never built or packaged before? Wouldn't Xorg be more involved than lower profile packages?
I think it's absolutely not a beginners package. In order to work on this you either need moderate knowledge on packaging or, more importantly, knowledge about x11 itself (starting with where to find the sources :) )
The package is one of the 'tops' when it comes to the number of patches... of which probably a bunch can be dropped now; blindly dropping them on the other hand is not a good move neither... which results in 'checking every single one' for it's use, understanding it, and possibly rebasing on top of the new xorg 1.12.
I can only second this. Updating xorg-x11-server packages is mainly about adjusting patches (still a bunch are not upstreamed yet; some like the VNC patches can never be upstreamed!). Second part is doing the required lib package updates, when xorg-server fails due to an outdated lib (which is mostly trivial).
Thanks, Stefan
I started update some time ago. I aimed in 1.11.4. Some paches was already upstream, some need adjust to new code. It seems that VNC pach set will be the hardest parf of updating xorg-x11-xserver. My partially work is in: https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=xorg-x11- server&project=home%3AFisiu%3Abranches%3AX11%3AXOrg I can start updating to 1.12.0 but I some help with VNC patches will be needed. -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Mariusz Fik openSUSE Community Member GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D
Hi, (Stefan: questions for you at the end) Le mercredi 11 avril 2012, à 16:07 +0200, Stefan Dirsch a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:51:23AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
The package is one of the 'tops' when it comes to the number of patches... of which probably a bunch can be dropped now; blindly dropping them on the other hand is not a good move neither... which results in 'checking every single one' for it's use, understanding it, and possibly rebasing on top of the new xorg 1.12.
I can only second this. Updating xorg-x11-server packages is mainly about adjusting patches (still a bunch are not upstreamed yet; some like the VNC patches can never be upstreamed!). Second part is doing the required lib package updates, when xorg-server fails due to an outdated lib (which is mostly trivial).
I've been updating nearly all lib packages living in X11:XOrg and sr'ed them. I'm going to finish with libX11 today (and libXi, which I have ready but depends on the new libX11). The fact that they're all split in their own packages made this much easier than before, I think. Note that I added upstream metadata for them, so new upstream versions are now indicated in OBS as well as in "osc collab todo --project X11:XOrg". Before touching the server, I'd like to also update the apps. I think splitting the xorg-x11 package in several source packages to have one source package per app would help. Stefan, is this something you'd be willing to accept? (I would add appropriate Requires to xorg-x11 to keep compatibility) Should we also split xorg-x11-util-devel and xorg-x11-proto-devel? The main benefit in splitting those in source package per tarball is that it's makes it much easier to track the upstream version. Also, I'm considering renaming xorg-x11-xtrans-devel to xtrans and xorg-x11-fonts-devel to font-util to match upstream names. Would that work for you, Stefan? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
(Stefan: questions for you at the end)
Le mercredi 11 avril 2012, à 16:07 +0200, Stefan Dirsch a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:51:23AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
The package is one of the 'tops' when it comes to the number of patches... of which probably a bunch can be dropped now; blindly dropping them on the other hand is not a good move neither... which results in 'checking every single one' for it's use, understanding it, and possibly rebasing on top of the new xorg 1.12.
I can only second this. Updating xorg-x11-server packages is mainly about adjusting patches (still a bunch are not upstreamed yet; some like the VNC patches can never be upstreamed!). Second part is doing the required lib package updates, when xorg-server fails due to an outdated lib (which is mostly trivial).
I've been updating nearly all lib packages living in X11:XOrg and sr'ed them.
Thanks a lot! Just accepted them. :-)
I'm going to finish with libX11 today (and libXi, which I have ready but depends on the new libX11). The fact that they're all split in their own packages made this much easier than before, I think.
Sure. But credits go to Jan (jengelh@medozas.de).
Note that I added upstream metadata for them, so new upstream versions are now indicated in OBS as well as in "osc collab todo --project X11:XOrg".
Hmm. Looks like I need to search for an osc version, which already knows about this "collab" option, to figure out, what this means exactly. Still using 0.134.1 here.
Before touching the server, I'd like to also update the apps. I think splitting the xorg-x11 package in several source packages to have one source package per app would help. Stefan, is this something you'd be willing to accept? (I would add appropriate Requires to xorg-x11 to keep compatibility)
Yes, definitely!
Should we also split xorg-x11-util-devel and xorg-x11-proto-devel?
xorg-x11-util-devel: yes xorg-x11-proto-devel: I remember discussions to merge these together again *upstream*, but I didn't follow them lately.
The main benefit in splitting those in source package per tarball is that it's makes it much easier to track the upstream version.
I see.
Also, I'm considering renaming xorg-x11-xtrans-devel to xtrans and xorg-x11-fonts-devel to font-util to match upstream names. Would that work for you, Stefan?
Yes, that's fine. Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Note that I added upstream metadata for them, so new upstream versions are now indicated in OBS as well as in "osc collab todo --project X11:XOrg".
Hmm. Looks like I need to search for an osc version, which already knows about this "collab" option, to figure out, what this means exactly. Still using 0.134.1 here.
So far, collab is not part of the 'stock' osc but is an "3rd party plugin". Look for osc-plugin-collab in openSUSE:Tools... Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012, à 13:02 +0200, Stefan Dirsch a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Note that I added upstream metadata for them, so new upstream versions are now indicated in OBS as well as in "osc collab todo --project X11:XOrg".
Hmm. Looks like I need to search for an osc version, which already knows about this "collab" option, to figure out, what this means exactly. Still using 0.134.1 here.
As Dominique mentioned, it's a plugin for osc. There's some doc at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Osc_Collab
Before touching the server, I'd like to also update the apps. I think splitting the xorg-x11 package in several source packages to have one source package per app would help. Stefan, is this something you'd be willing to accept? (I would add appropriate Requires to xorg-x11 to keep compatibility)
Yes, definitely!
Cool, I'll work on that. If people want to help, please join the effort: there are many many tarballs in xorg-x11. Just ping me on irc so we can avoid duplication of work.
Should we also split xorg-x11-util-devel and xorg-x11-proto-devel?
xorg-x11-util-devel: yes xorg-x11-proto-devel: I remember discussions to merge these together again *upstream*, but I didn't follow them lately.
[...]
Also, I'm considering renaming xorg-x11-xtrans-devel to xtrans and xorg-x11-fonts-devel to font-util to match upstream names. Would that work for you, Stefan?
Yes, that's fine.
Ok, I'll keep that in mind. I guess I'll wait for this batch of lib changes to hit Factory first, so that the splits/renamings don't slow down integration in Factory. Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:35:46PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hmm. Looks like I need to search for an osc version, which already knows about this "collab" option, to figure out, what this means exactly. Still using 0.134.1 here.
As Dominique mentioned, it's a plugin for osc. There's some doc at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Osc_Collab
Thanks.
Also, I'm considering renaming xorg-x11-xtrans-devel to xtrans and xorg-x11-fonts-devel to font-util to match upstream names. Would that work for you, Stefan?
Yes, that's fine.
Ok, I'll keep that in mind. I guess I'll wait for this batch of lib changes to hit Factory first, so that the splits/renamings don't slow down integration in Factory.
Yeah. Makes sense. Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hello List mates, I have been having a problem in which the installer with default kernel freezes when "Searching for Linux Partitions" during the probing. This has been happening since 12.2 M1 - M3. To resolve this I add "acpi=off" to the boot options. This should not happen with the default kernel. Should I add this as a bug under "Installation" or "Kernel" in Bugzilla? Cheers! Roman -------------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE Linux -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! -------------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012, à 14:35 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012, à 13:02 +0200, Stefan Dirsch a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Before touching the server, I'd like to also update the apps. I think splitting the xorg-x11 package in several source packages to have one source package per app would help. Stefan, is this something you'd be willing to accept? (I would add appropriate Requires to xorg-x11 to keep compatibility)
Yes, definitely!
Cool, I'll work on that. If people want to help, please join the effort: there are many many tarballs in xorg-x11. Just ping me on irc so we can avoid duplication of work.
This is done now, see all the sr to X11:XOrg. Most of the new packages are trivial, but I guess at least xinit and xdm should be double-checked. Thanks to Mike Gorse for handling some of the conversion! Two notes: - I used the upstream name as source package name. This is obviously fine for most packages, but for ico and rgb (and maybe a few others), the name might sound generic. I checked, and Mageia uses the upstream name for those too, so I don't expect an issue. - I tried to avoid changing the packages as much as possible (except for adding Requires when needed), to make the review easier. I only updated smproxy and xfs to a new version because of some lib changes, and added a patch to lbxproxy to fix the build. We can do the update to latest upstream versions later on. Now xorg-x11 contains: - the content of the scripts upstream tarball. This name is way too generic, so I haven't split it yet. I can split it to xorg-scripts, maybe? - those files, that come from misc.tar.bz2: /etc/X11/Xresources /usr/share/X11/nls/{C,nls.dir} /usr/bin/X11 (symlink to /usr/bin) It's unclear to me what to do with those. xorg-x11 has Requires for all the new packages. So an update should go smoothly. However, it might make sense to drop some of those Requires: we might not need all the packages related to X fonts and X printers by default, nor some of the small utilities that are shipped by most desktops (xcalc, xman, xmh, xmore, etc.). But we can do that later on again. Stefan, have fun with the reviews :-) Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Stefan, have fun with the reviews :-)
Cheers,
Vincent
Vincent + all the others, thanks so much for the hardwork ! Happy 12.2 -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch openSUSE Member & Ambassador GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:34:53AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
- the content of the scripts upstream tarball. This name is way too generic, so I haven't split it yet. I can split it to xorg-scripts, maybe?
As you like. ;-)
- those files, that come from misc.tar.bz2: /etc/X11/Xresources
It's used by xinit and the display managers. I would keep it.
/usr/share/X11/nls/{C,nls.dir}
Good question. Next question?
/usr/bin/X11 (symlink to /usr/bin)
Compatibility symlink for ancient scripts. Better keep it.
xorg-x11 has Requires for all the new packages. So an update should go smoothly. However, it might make sense to drop some of those Requires: we might not need all the packages related to X fonts and X printers by default, nor some of the small utilities that are shipped by most desktops (xcalc, xman, xmh, xmore, etc.). But we can do that later on again.
Exactly. Next step is to fix the build of X11:XOrg project again. ;-) Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
Exactly. Next step is to fix the build of X11:XOrg project again. ;-)
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=X11%3AXOrg doesn't look bad at the moment.. there are a bunch of 'unresolvables', but they are likely disappearing when the build of the prj is complete. Do you happen to know of packages really in need of attention? I might have a look at some :) Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le dimanche 15 avril 2012, à 07:52 -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a écrit :
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
Exactly. Next step is to fix the build of X11:XOrg project again. ;-)
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=X11%3AXOrg doesn't look bad at the moment.. there are a bunch of 'unresolvables', but they are likely disappearing when the build of the prj is complete.
Do you happen to know of packages really in need of attention? I might have a look at some :)
I'm only aware of xorg-x11-server, and you're on it already ;-) But the real thing will be to test the packages, I guess. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Vincent Untz <vuntz@opensuse.org>:
Le dimanche 15 avril 2012, à 07:52 -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a écrit :
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
Exactly. Next step is to fix the build of X11:XOrg project again. ;-)
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=X11%3AXOrg doesn't look bad at the moment.. there are a bunch of 'unresolvables', but they are likely disappearing when the build of the prj is complete.
Do you happen to know of packages really in need of attention? I might have a look at some :)
I'm only aware of xorg-x11-server, and you're on it already ;-)
But the real thing will be to test the packages, I guess.
Stefan, Vincent, et. al, I have a package of xorg server 1.12.1 ready in my branch (home:dimstar:branches:X11:XOrg) By ready I mean: a good part of the patches has been rebased to this version, some were dropped (I figured that patches starting with u_ came from upstream?) There are currently two patches I had to disable: either I rebased them wrongly or they are no longer applicable. They killed the build for now; The two patches are: * bug-197858_dpms.diff * sync-fix.patch And a bunch of patches have not been rebased yet... * confine_to_shape.diff * pci-legacy-mem-fallback.diff * bug474071-fix1.diff * pio_ia64.diff * VNC Patches! (vnc is currently disabled in my branch) As the weekend is over, that means I will only have 'limited' time again to work on this package. So if somebody can pick it up to push further, that would be great! Dominique PS: Package not yet submitted to X1!:XOrg - no more tests than 'it builds' have been done so far. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:11:08AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
I have a package of xorg server 1.12.1 ready in my branch (home:dimstar:branches:X11:XOrg)
By ready I mean: a good part of the patches has been rebased to this version, some were dropped (I figured that patches starting with u_ came from upstream?)
Not quite right. u_ means these still need to go to upstream. See http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Patches_Guidelines_for_X11:XOrg_Project Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:11:08AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
I have a package of xorg server 1.12.1 ready in my branch (home:dimstar:branches:X11:XOrg)
By ready I mean: a good part of the patches has been rebased to this version, some were dropped (I figured that patches starting with u_ came from upstream?)
Not quite right. u_ means these still need to go to upstream. See
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Patches_Guidelines_for_X11:XOrg_Project
Interesting.. because all of those had been merged either as it was in the patch or in slight modified way... I hope I did not break much with this action :( Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 05:09:53AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:11:08AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
I have a package of xorg server 1.12.1 ready in my branch (home:dimstar:branches:X11:XOrg)
By ready I mean: a good part of the patches has been rebased to this version, some were dropped (I figured that patches starting with u_ came from upstream?)
Not quite right. u_ means these still need to go to upstream. See
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Patches_Guidelines_for_X11:XOrg_Project
Interesting.. because all of those had been merged either as it was in the patch or in slight modified way...
It is possible, that the issue has already been fixed upstream in the same, similar of different way. This needs to be verified patch by patch ... Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 05:09:53AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
Quoting Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.de>:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:11:08AM -0400, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
I have a package of xorg server 1.12.1 ready in my branch (home:dimstar:branches:X11:XOrg)
By ready I mean: a good part of the patches has been rebased to this version, some were dropped (I figured that patches starting with u_ came from upstream?)
Not quite right. u_ means these still need to go to upstream. See
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Patches_Guidelines_for_X11:XOrg_Project
Interesting.. because all of those had been merged either as it was in the patch or in slight modified way...
It is possible, that the issue has already been fixed upstream in the same, similar of different way. This needs to be verified patch by patch ...
Right.. this is what I did for a full Sunday :) (was cold outside anyway). So as said: I can only hope all went right. and a bunch of patches I'm aware I did either wrong or not rebase at all yet (the ones mentioned earlier). That's the ones somebody will still have to work on. Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi, Dominique is trying to test his update for the X server. He realized he needs to rebuild the package for video drivers, first though (because of some ABI). This brings us to another next step: splitting xorg-x11-driver-input and xorg-x11-driver-video. I have several questions for this: a) should we actually split those packages? :-) (I assume yes) b) what naming scheme should we use for the source package: - upstream? (xf86-input-evdev) - what we currently seem to use? (that would be: xorg-x11-driver-input-evdev) c) what naming scheme should we use for the resulting binary package? (same options as for b) d) what should we do for drivers that are not part of X11 7.7? See the list at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2012-April/001933.html This includes: xf86-input-acecad xf86-input-aiptek xf86-video-apm xf86-video-chips xf86-video-i740 xf86-video-rendition xf86-video-s3 xf86-video-s3virge xf86-video-sisusb xf86-video-suncg14 xf86-video-suncg3 xf86-video-sunleo xf86-video-suntcx xf86-video-tseng xf86-video-xgi xf86-video-xgixp (We don't have xf86-video-sun*, but we have all the other ones) Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02:21AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
This brings us to another next step: splitting xorg-x11-driver-input and xorg-x11-driver-video.
I have several questions for this:
a) should we actually split those packages? :-) (I assume yes)
yes. :-)
b) what naming scheme should we use for the source package: - upstream? (xf86-input-evdev) - what we currently seem to use? (that would be: xorg-x11-driver-input-evdev)
upstream, i.e. xf86-video-<drivername> and xf86-input-<drivername>
c) what naming scheme should we use for the resulting binary package? (same options as for b)
upstream, i.e. xf86-video-<drivername> and xf86-input-<drivername>
d) what should we do for drivers that are not part of X11 7.7? See the list at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2012-April/001933.html This includes: xf86-input-acecad xf86-input-aiptek xf86-video-apm xf86-video-chips xf86-video-i740 xf86-video-rendition xf86-video-s3 xf86-video-s3virge xf86-video-sisusb xf86-video-suncg14 xf86-video-suncg3 xf86-video-sunleo xf86-video-suntcx xf86-video-tseng xf86-video-xgi xf86-video-xgixp (We don't have xf86-video-sun*, but we have all the other ones)
Drop them. :-) Egbert, interested in maintaining the "chips" driver? ;-) Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:53:57PM +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
Drop them. :-) Egbert, interested in maintaining the "chips" driver? ;-)
He is. He just agreed on maintaining it. He even has the latest (and I guess last) generation of GPUs for testing available. :-) Anybody who volunteers to create the chips package? Thanks, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le jeudi 19 avril 2012, à 16:16 +0200, Stefan Dirsch a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:53:57PM +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
Drop them. :-) Egbert, interested in maintaining the "chips" driver? ;-)
He is. He just agreed on maintaining it. He even has the latest (and I guess last) generation of GPUs for testing available. :-)
Anybody who volunteers to create the chips package?
I'll handle it. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le mercredi 18 avril 2012, à 11:02 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
Dominique is trying to test his update for the X server. He realized he needs to rebuild the package for video drivers, first though (because of some ABI).
This brings us to another next step: splitting xorg-x11-driver-input and xorg-x11-driver-video.
This is done and submitted to X11:XOrg. As far as I can tell, this means all the big packages in X11:XOrg are now split, except xorg-x11-fonts (I don't think we want to split this one) and xorg-x11-proto-devel (not splitting for now, as discussed earlier). Dominique is nearly ready to submit his xorg-x11-server update, I think. After that, we will likely have to update a few drivers to work with the new xorg-x11-server (and update them all to require the right ABI), and do some final testing before pushing everything to Factory. Once everything will have landed in Factory, the remaining steps will be: - handle some package renamings (some of this is already done in my branch, but I don't want to have to push this at the same time as the big push to Factory, to avoid confusion -- it involves deleting packages after all). - change the xorg-x11 compatibility Requires so we don't install tons of small utilities nobody use by default. I guess we'll create some metapackage like xorg-x11-utils to still make them easily installable. Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi all, On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
There are currently two patches I had to disable: either I rebased them wrongly or they are no longer applicable. They killed the build for now; The two patches are: * bug-197858_dpms.diff * sync-fix.patch
Fyi, these were just simple typos that caused the build to fail; DimStar has fixed them.
And a bunch of patches have not been rebased yet... * confine_to_shape.diff
I've rebased this, along with the vpn patches, in home:mgorse:branches:X11:XOrg/xorg-x11-server (based on the dimstar branch). The code builds, but it is untested.
* pci-legacy-mem-fallback.diff * bug474071-fix1.diff * pio_ia64.diff
These all seem to involve a legacy API which is no longer available in 1.12. I have no idea if the bugs they fixed are present in 1.12. -Mike -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Quoting Mike Gorse <mgorse@suse.com>:
Hi all,
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
There are currently two patches I had to disable: either I rebased them wrongly or they are no longer applicable. They killed the build for now; The two patches are: * bug-197858_dpms.diff * sync-fix.patch
Fyi, these were just simple typos that caused the build to fail; DimStar has fixed them.
Thank you for pointing those out! Shows that too many patches to rebase is always a good cause for trouble.
And a bunch of patches have not been rebased yet... * confine_to_shape.diff
I've rebased this, along with the vpn patches, in home:mgorse:branches:X11:XOrg/xorg-x11-server (based on the dimstar branch). The code builds, but it is untested.
Thank you very much! Any chance to get this pushed to my branch already? I'll do some more testing in my VM later on and then we need start pushing this all to X11:XOrg so we end up in Factory in time...
* pci-legacy-mem-fallback.diff * bug474071-fix1.diff * pio_ia64.diff
These all seem to involve a legacy API which is no longer available in 1.12. I have no idea if the bugs they fixed are present in 1.12.
That was mostly the question I had on most patches: are they really still needed? There is a bunch of them which is 'simple enough to make sense'... some I did not want to read long enough to really understand them. One of the next big goals must be to ensure those patches flow back upstream where they ultimately make sense. Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012, à 13:02 +0200, Stefan Dirsch a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Should we also split xorg-x11-util-devel and xorg-x11-proto-devel?
xorg-x11-util-devel: yes xorg-x11-proto-devel: I remember discussions to merge these together again *upstream*, but I didn't follow them lately.
[...]
Also, I'm considering renaming xorg-x11-xtrans-devel to xtrans and xorg-x11-fonts-devel to font-util to match upstream names. Would that work for you, Stefan?
Yes, that's fine.
For reference, this is done in home:vuntz:branches:X11:XOrg. I'll submit once the current changes in X11:XOrg are pushed to Factory. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/10/2012 02:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them.
I tried the KDE Live CD x86_64 Build 315 on a VirtualBox VM. It fails the same way that the i686 version does with the following: Loading KIWI CD Boot-System... ------------------------------ Creating device nodes with udev /sbin/udevd: error while loading shared libraries: libkmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> [ 0.983960] Searching for boot device in Application ID............... [ 75.614699] Failed to find MBR identifier ! [ 75.635841] rebootException: error consoles at Alt-F3/F4 [ 75.649460] rebootException: reboot in 120 sec... It appears that libkmod.so.2 is not available. On the VM, I have not been able to access the error console. Thanks, Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/10/2012 09:13 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them.
I tried the KDE Live CD x86_64 Build 315 on a VirtualBox VM. It fails the same way that the i686 version does with the following:
Loading KIWI CD Boot-System... ------------------------------ Creating device nodes with udev /sbin/udevd: error while loading shared libraries: libkmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> [ 0.983960] Searching for boot device in Application ID............... [ 75.614699] Failed to find MBR identifier ! [ 75.635841] rebootException: error consoles at Alt-F3/F4 [ 75.649460] rebootException: reboot in 120 sec...
It appears that libkmod.so.2 is not available. On the VM, I have not been able to access the error console.
Yeah, those are totally broken. Anybody interested in looking into this? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/10/2012 03:22 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 04/10/2012 09:13 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them.
I tried the KDE Live CD x86_64 Build 315 on a VirtualBox VM. It fails the same way that the i686 version does with the following:
Loading KIWI CD Boot-System... ------------------------------ Creating device nodes with udev /sbin/udevd: error while loading shared libraries: libkmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> [ 0.983960] Searching for boot device in Application ID............... [ 75.614699] Failed to find MBR identifier ! [ 75.635841] rebootException: error consoles at Alt-F3/F4 [ 75.649460] rebootException: reboot in 120 sec...
It appears that libkmod.so.2 is not available. On the VM, I have not been able to access the error console.
Yeah, those are totally broken. Anybody interested in looking into this?
Know and fixed issue, we need a new version of KIWI in Factory. SR is pending.... anyone with the appropriate powers just needs to pull this into Factory ;) Later, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjschwei@suse.com rschweik@ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 22:08:57 Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 04/10/2012 03:22 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 04/10/2012 09:13 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:13 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Just a short update: The x86-64 media look fine but the i686 have broken metadata or contents, installation is not possible at all with them.
I tried the KDE Live CD x86_64 Build 315 on a VirtualBox VM. It fails the same way that the i686 version does with the following:
Loading KIWI CD Boot-System... ------------------------------ Creating device nodes with udev /sbin/udevd: error while loading shared libraries: libkmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> /sbin/udevadm: <Same error message> [ 0.983960] Searching for boot device in Application ID............... [ 75.614699] Failed to find MBR identifier ! [ 75.635841] rebootException: error consoles at Alt-F3/F4 [ 75.649460] rebootException: reboot in 120 sec...
It appears that libkmod.so.2 is not available. On the VM, I have not been able to access the error console.
Yeah, those are totally broken. Anybody interested in looking into this?
Know and fixed issue, we need a new version of KIWI in Factory. SR is pending.... anyone with the appropriate powers just needs to pull this into Factory ;)
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction. I will do the install later this evening. Thanks, Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction. I will do the install later this evening. =========== Added later ============= Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are: /usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly. I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list. Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> schrieb: On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction. I will do the install later this evening. =========== Added later ============= Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are: /usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly. I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list. Larry Thanks for testing. Could you file a bugreport and update the Wiki, please? I'll release later today after some quick testing, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter / Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) send from my phone
On 12/04/12 16:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> schrieb:
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we > can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction.
I will do the install later this evening.
=========== Added later =============
Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are:
/usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install
When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly.
I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and*workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list.
Larry
*
* Thanks for testing.
Could you file a bugreport and update the Wiki, please?
I'll release later today after some quick testing,
Andreas *
Oh dear, my post was too late..... :-( . BC -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/12/2012 02:07 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
On 12/04/12 16:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> schrieb:
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction.
I will do the install later this evening.
=========== Added later =============
Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are:
/usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install
When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly.
I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and*workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list.
Larry
*
* Thanks for testing.
Could you file a bugreport and update the Wiki, please?
I'll release later today after some quick testing,
Andreas *
Oh dear, my post was too late..... :-( .
BC
Basil, I added a line to the Wiki. Once you have filed a bug report, please add the reference to the line. Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 13/04/12 01:41, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/12/2012 02:07 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
On 12/04/12 16:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> schrieb:
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and
then we
can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction.
I will do the install later this evening.
=========== Added later =============
Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are:
/usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install
When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly.
I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and*workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list.
Larry
*
* Thanks for testing.
Could you file a bugreport and update the Wiki, please?
I'll release later today after some quick testing,
Andreas *
Oh dear, my post was too late..... :-( .
BC
Basil,
I added a line to the Wiki. Once you have filed a bug report, please add the reference to the line.
Larry
Hi Larry, Sorry for the delay in responding (I've been fooling around with Fedora 16 and Kubuntu Oneiric, both of which work perfectly with my hardware and not only do the Live versions work but each installs perfectly "out of the box" - Kubuntu, in fact, provided me with my 1920x1080p resolution on the monitor without the need for the "real" nVidia driver). I note that the Release Notes for Milestone #3 now contain the warning that "nomodeset" may need to be added to the kernel command line before the Live CD will actually do something. A few minutes ago I went to start an account on Novell's Bugzilla but found that the details which I must provide would not be provided to an encrypted site - and I am not about to send all my personal details over a channel which is not secure. BC -- There comes a time in the affairs of a man when he has to take the bull by the tail and face the situation. W C Fields -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 08:24:34 Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks for testing.
Could you file a bugreport and update the Wiki, please?
Ah,. there's one already - I updated the wiki and the bug report.
I'll release later today after some quick testing,
Andreas P.S. Sorry for the bad quoting from my smartphone, -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 12/04/12 14:04, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction.
I will do the install later this evening.
=========== Added later =============
Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are:
/usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install
When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly.
I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list.
Larry
I hope that this is not taken as the go-ahead to release MS #3 because it is doing on the 32-bit system the same as the last build I downloaded did: you need to type "nomodeset" on the kernel boot line before the CD will do anything. No "nomodeset" and all you get is going around and around in an endless loop of the "system" (a name for want of any other better word right now) of not doing anything and the screen coming up with "No signal". BC -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 09:04:53 Basil Chupin wrote:
On 12/04/12 14:04, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release...
I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction.
I will do the install later this evening.
=========== Added later =============
Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are:
/usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install
When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly.
I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list.
Larry
I hope that this is not taken as the go-ahead to release MS #3 because it is doing on the 32-bit system the same as the last build I downloaded did: you need to type "nomodeset" on the kernel boot line before the CD will do anything.
Please open a bugreport and update the wiki page: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Most_annoying_bugs_12.2_dev with a reference to the bug report.
No "nomodeset" and all you get is going around and around in an endless loop of the "system" (a name for want of any other better word right now) of not doing anything and the screen coming up with "No signal".
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 12/04/12 18:14, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 09:04:53 Basil Chupin wrote:
On 12/04/12 14:04, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/11/2012 04:02 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, we checked kiwi in. Hope this fixes the Live media - and then we can release... I downloaded openSUSE-KDE-LiveCD-i686-Build0318-Media.iso. It boots on my VM. I have not yet installed using it as I'm doing kernel bisections at the moment, but it certainly is a step in the right direction.
I will do the install later this evening.
=========== Added later =============
Installation of GRUB2 failed due to missing files the same as happened with MS2. The specific files not found are:
/usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig /usr/sbin/grub2-install
When I retried the bootloader installation using GRUB rather than GRUB2, the installation finished correctly.
I think that the release can proceed as long as we post the problem and workaround on the "most annoying bugs" list.
Larry I hope that this is not taken as the go-ahead to release MS #3 because it is doing on the 32-bit system the same as the last build I downloaded did: you need to type "nomodeset" on the kernel boot line before the CD will do anything. Please open a bugreport and update the wiki page: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Most_annoying_bugs_12.2_dev with a reference to the bug report.
No "nomodeset" and all you get is going around and around in an endless loop of the "system" (a name for want of any other better word right now) of not doing anything and the screen coming up with "No signal". Andreas
Hi Andreas, Please see my reply to Larry Finger I posted a minute or so ago where I wrote: quote Hi Larry, Sorry for the delay in responding (I've been fooling around with Fedora 16 and Kubuntu Oneiric, both of which work perfectly with my hardware and not only do the Live versions work but each installs perfectly "out of the box" - Kubuntu, in fact, provided me with my 1920x1080p resolution on the monitor without the need for the "real" nVidia driver). I note that the Release Notes for Milestone #3 now contain the warning that "nomodeset" may need to be added to the kernel command line before the Live CD will actually do something. A few minutes ago I went to start an account on Novell's Bugzilla but found that the details which I must provide would not be provided to an encrypted site - and I am not about to send all my personal details over a channel which is not secure. unquote BC -- There comes a time in the affairs of a man when he has to take the bull by the tail and face the situation. W C Fields -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (18)
-
Alin Marin Elena -
Andreas Jaeger -
Basil Chupin -
Bruno Friedmann -
C -
Claudio Freire -
Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar -
Felix Miata -
Ismail Dönmez -
Larry Finger -
Mariusz Fik -
Mike Gorse -
Robert Kaiser -
Robert Schweikert -
Roman Bysh -
Stefan Dirsch -
Stephan Kulow -
Vincent Untz