[opensuse-factory] KDE 4.9 is now in Tumbleweed:Testing
Hi all. Thanks to Jiri for doing the heavy lifting, it looks like KDE 4.9 is almost ready to push to openSUSE:Tumbleweed. Right now it's built in openSUSE:Tumbleweed:Testing and seems to work for me, but it would be great if someone who really knows (and uses) KDE to actually test it out to verify it's all sane. So, could someone add this repo to their system, do a 'zypper dup' and let me know if they have any problems? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:38:01AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Hi all.
Thanks to Jiri for doing the heavy lifting, it looks like KDE 4.9 is almost ready to push to openSUSE:Tumbleweed. Right now it's built in openSUSE:Tumbleweed:Testing and seems to work for me, but it would be great if someone who really knows (and uses) KDE to actually test it out to verify it's all sane.
So, could someone add this repo to their system, do a 'zypper dup' and let me know if they have any problems?
Hm, there's a problem with the openSUSE branding package at the moment, keeping things like kwin and others from being updated, let me get that fixed up first... greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:38:29AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:38:01AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Hi all.
Thanks to Jiri for doing the heavy lifting, it looks like KDE 4.9 is almost ready to push to openSUSE:Tumbleweed. Right now it's built in openSUSE:Tumbleweed:Testing and seems to work for me, but it would be great if someone who really knows (and uses) KDE to actually test it out to verify it's all sane.
So, could someone add this repo to their system, do a 'zypper dup' and let me know if they have any problems?
Hm, there's a problem with the openSUSE branding package at the moment, keeping things like kwin and others from being updated, let me get that fixed up first...
Odd, it's not building because of this confusing error: have choice for modutils needed by mkinitrd: module-init-tools kmod-compat What does that mean here? openSUSE:Tumbleweed has both of these packages in it, is that confusing the resolver somehow? branding-openSUSE_12.2 depends on mkinitrd, should I just add that to the repo as well? confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 09:49:19 Greg KH wrote:
Odd, it's not building because of this confusing error: have choice for modutils needed by mkinitrd: module-init-tools kmod-compat
What does that mean here? openSUSE:Tumbleweed has both of these packages in it, is that confusing the resolver somehow? branding-openSUSE_12.2 depends on mkinitrd, should I just add that to the repo as well?
confused,
greg k-h
Hi Greg, I would avoid putting mkinitrd in Tumbleweed. Best way would be to have the branding-openSUSE_12.2 package to have a buildrequire for module-init-tools. This would resolve the issue. Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:30:56PM +0100, Raymond Wooninck wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 09:49:19 Greg KH wrote:
Odd, it's not building because of this confusing error: have choice for modutils needed by mkinitrd: module-init-tools kmod-compat
What does that mean here? openSUSE:Tumbleweed has both of these packages in it, is that confusing the resolver somehow? branding-openSUSE_12.2 depends on mkinitrd, should I just add that to the repo as well?
confused,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
I would avoid putting mkinitrd in Tumbleweed. Best way would be to have the branding-openSUSE_12.2 package to have a buildrequire for module-init-tools. This would resolve the issue.
Ok, now trying that. I'm also hesitant to add mkinitrd to Tumbleweed right now, given all of the recent changes in it due to the symlink changes in Factory, but odds are, it will be eventually necessary for other kernel changes... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 12:23:10 Greg KH wrote:
Ok, now trying that. I'm also hesitant to add mkinitrd to Tumbleweed right now, given all of the recent changes in it due to the symlink changes in Factory, but odds are, it will be eventually necessary for other kernel changes...
Hi Greg, Against which 12.2 repo are you building ? It seems that KR49 is building against the standard 12.2 repo and not against the update repo. This might be the reason why in KR49 we do not see this issue. Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:27:47PM +0100, Raymond Wooninck wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 12:23:10 Greg KH wrote:
Ok, now trying that. I'm also hesitant to add mkinitrd to Tumbleweed right now, given all of the recent changes in it due to the symlink changes in Factory, but odds are, it will be eventually necessary for other kernel changes...
Hi Greg,
Against which 12.2 repo are you building ? It seems that KR49 is building against the standard 12.2 repo and not against the update repo. This might be the reason why in KR49 we do not see this issue.
Tumbleweed is based against 12.2, although I guess it should be against the update repo, I hadn't thought of that. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/14/2012 06:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, there's a problem with the openSUSE branding package at the moment, keeping things like kwin and others from being updated, let me get that fixed up first...
Odd, it's not building because of this confusing error: have choice for modutils needed by mkinitrd: module-init-tools kmod-compat
What does that mean here? openSUSE:Tumbleweed has both of these packages in it, is that confusing the resolver somehow? branding-openSUSE_12.2 depends on mkinitrd, should I just add that to the repo as well?
Nope, fix the ambiguity by adding Prefer: mkinitrd:module-init-tools to prjconf... - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQo+kQAAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJh2oQAJzl4yElVYVnrwSJwJzM682D w/JEyUVggSvD0MW5+TKVh+3G295XWgFOdmQ7hBixTTLKC1hPZ3VrppuBAywpCy13 2OsUt8tWgJ4KGN9ISRIUyvcINP7JO5DRhZo4NPg28aq93VfMSEtIG8yclxDDCmz8 tJUlkzDuTY3UUsnbZAmVops2TapxundxLLuuehLNbTISnmIc0o/C1fE1SIJOvIaF WcnOtOMTxPWSqr/zJTDg9gF7aRcUd/AGSL5iO+QvVNbf7OYwVWXvkV3cYUtsAdKC ph9GLYY7YNDgrNsUspex4gOMvrhNDl1UY1WOH4O8fVXMHUpotT+ag5VbHC07PRJN Kvwsl53KdM+bEZTi5IthWJTa8MTkLPYv6nNVtxf9dDKtmbZlce9AAP5RK5PlFnmq kZgimAj2eVbwpEZ7abjVHxJ49PZqj8JSQuKGxjElFEy3qjNoyLwkeBtOt2qcnIBB v5kkzDbw/vijV93uO0K8v3AypRvJDXGOJqv9Nefl9Y667jZZR950upsA1dtcP1EM Di3cf+JPDjnCRKM1FahVP77P4t684E6SD/+HruYSeEJZogpAgwm39k9dmaRqz3q1 NivAJ+1PmGLbf8TtxX2UksQ9Yl+Yyd5v+RaYOg6SVvncRyUzylqXr2C0EHAIYvN4 pZYghkVX6K9E2Xs1C17B =+6Jm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:55:12PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 11/14/2012 06:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, there's a problem with the openSUSE branding package at the moment, keeping things like kwin and others from being updated, let me get that fixed up first...
Odd, it's not building because of this confusing error: have choice for modutils needed by mkinitrd: module-init-tools kmod-compat
What does that mean here? openSUSE:Tumbleweed has both of these packages in it, is that confusing the resolver somehow? branding-openSUSE_12.2 depends on mkinitrd, should I just add that to the repo as well?
Nope, fix the ambiguity by adding Prefer: mkinitrd:module-init-tools to prjconf...
Ok, just did that, let's see if that resolves the issue. I wonder how the KDE:49 repo got around not having that problem, odd. Also, kdevelop4 is failing with a very weird build error: [ 1128s] I: Function call needs to pass NULL-pointer as last argument [ 1128s] E: kdevelop4 missing-sentinel /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kdevelop-4.3.1/debuggers/gdb/stty.cpp:336, 343 did it work properly for you? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:22:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:55:12PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 11/14/2012 06:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, there's a problem with the openSUSE branding package at the moment, keeping things like kwin and others from being updated, let me get that fixed up first...
Odd, it's not building because of this confusing error: have choice for modutils needed by mkinitrd: module-init-tools kmod-compat
What does that mean here? openSUSE:Tumbleweed has both of these packages in it, is that confusing the resolver somehow? branding-openSUSE_12.2 depends on mkinitrd, should I just add that to the repo as well?
Nope, fix the ambiguity by adding Prefer: mkinitrd:module-init-tools to prjconf...
Ok, just did that, let's see if that resolves the issue.
Yes, looks like it did, thanks, that caused a bunch of other packages to rebuild, hopefully that resolves the problem. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
* Greg KH <gregkh@linux.com> [11-14-12 15:30]:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:22:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:55:12PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Nope, fix the ambiguity by adding Prefer: mkinitrd:module-init-tools to prjconf...
Ok, just did that, let's see if that resolves the issue.
Yes, looks like it did, thanks, that caused a bunch of other packages to rebuild, hopefully that resolves the problem.
OK, is it ready to test, or not finished building yet? tks, -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:33:44PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Greg KH <gregkh@linux.com> [11-14-12 15:30]:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:22:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:55:12PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Nope, fix the ambiguity by adding Prefer: mkinitrd:module-init-tools to prjconf...
Ok, just did that, let's see if that resolves the issue.
Yes, looks like it did, thanks, that caused a bunch of other packages to rebuild, hopefully that resolves the problem.
OK, is it ready to test, or not finished building yet?
It's not finished building yet, you can watch it at: https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?project=openSUSE%3ATumbleweed%3AT... if you like watching paint dry :) Check back in a day or so, hopefully it should be done by then. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/14/2012 10:52 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:33:44PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
OK, is it ready to test, or not finished building yet?
LOL
It's not finished building yet, you can watch it at: https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?project=openSUSE%3ATumbleweed%3AT...
if you like watching paint dry :) Have you considered rebuild="direct" also for testing? That should help in this case a _lot_. thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQpBZMAAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJc8AP/0hqnfKPn+JhtlB6QFxL/axv 1+TUc3mFkCP3NqkPO71eO/U/uIMu7SMAaiEoOxC/ieSICvi2dkqDaBpK58aJanPE JHNG+gmvA+md791grLunPtih2HazT/CB82mmixUOvT2/ico8VSByZceHU9qsdVKB bdP38XdvHUX6iT4Xzkx2lGF62J8y96KL6Y1eU0s/HqrzFSMLF1RSgOUBYR3Zdgn5 N9QZaHL9NKAUtRw3uvNxp5WE3EnK2I+Td15Nw754cy5O2YOloY7K6Ef0jPDe8P/9 wF/8olpEDxDq/R69/V7Y6uKl3UTm8cTFIITofKd2rT5oEFuFYvzx3tV5bSDuR8za BbxxN26Ftb3caxxtGnk/Phn4XMqJ/oBpULLPqsvImgQJMYJw8v8fMWYefo63iF7J ezDKqNc+ZVBilbpxD6kI/devTLHhIm1JsEGbxzqjIc2EJVp0y+FMPEipo/+9k8Sd PeNp4x+GB71LQ7z6NrJLTjUSlub8CX62f7eEboa/D5CFAAhKHeTN5JzENA9uR1KJ 2cuDiWKOp0dYNl8lCPvVtf1+0IkBl+CQJIu2H4ugCnSYz5ZLKrgpMsQgvI+jTB/m IgQJtkWVQuFOx07hFwv4lMCKQWecj4b8XRvvMzQ6JPIy4Cm3PAWiSHUzxKhYVOjB TJ3jykzhEdNG/QjY2/v1 =zAbu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:08:12PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Have you considered rebuild="direct" also for testing? That should help in this case a _lot_.
That's not a bad idea, but where does it go, in the project configuration or Meta? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/14/2012 11:50 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:08:12PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Have you considered rebuild="direct" also for testing? That should help in this case a _lot_.
That's not a bad idea, but where does it go, in the project configuration or Meta?
What do you mean by Meta? It is an attribute in the repository element in 'osc meta prj'. thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQpCP5AAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJ3RwQAJtiwpoyWk21Cn1joienH3ga e9ftLkI+a/AslTD12t2wGadn5pNT4cvc45CRM35IDwJ8PP9tKPse6J0feXbQrOt7 G/t+OytdMTwAxaGh4t/OZX/LAXoYe8Syutnlzz18fnBE4dg82P6QkfqhiE/anxly PnuRwWcHVTMg2pYQSj7KFyY5sK2eWXBhOPYxe9PBugilODbswYSJfWPgbQ2TW0qU aALCUpGt1qN87pc4H7mDAXVqUDEK6WILFZ4eHyDOv+pbvauC5LRRWuOC2atEWJxy OQAbCdNxxZKpwTdkW10/B58N9shsaOX3sWebgWXxGehjec6IUnnh23F3NnccuNJy ShJn/986UqCX6Ang7jkIM95YZ2QBIpXJ0w/A8KvxiO/FkMoWMy6qchn55UnJoG6x I2fQ/OVFv/9LSrSEBTZpq/htd00rPqC495tBTyldPqbBU3nEjEIBP9n27w69J5vv oqskWbL7xLcSUs5FagmpPsXOEgKe1PatX/B6nb9TwwBKAwKwB02xvcacavKyPmIA fSFEDqqyfdKghSgnnX48jv7r33LCpb+qzSkZt4SFIUeL3f0EwX03PN9rbVsbqZJx A1eEL05yAMuaw8er6iN8E9iZIT//Eu6psIAz8gCekufNDh+BOhCUUrSrEUJEtEzs e+SXWNdga0BdWlVRqG20 =POG4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:06:33AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 11/14/2012 11:50 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:08:12PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Have you considered rebuild="direct" also for testing? That should help in this case a _lot_.
That's not a bad idea, but where does it go, in the project configuration or Meta?
What do you mean by Meta? It is an attribute in the repository element in 'osc meta prj'.
Sorry, I was looking at the "Meta" tab on the web interface, I've added this now, let's see if it cuts down on the rebuilds a bit. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/15/2012 12:15 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:06:33AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
What do you mean by Meta? It is an attribute in the repository element in 'osc meta prj'.
Sorry, I was looking at the "Meta" tab on the web interface, I've added this now, let's see if it cuts down on the rebuilds a bit.
Ah :D. Ok, that's the one too. thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQpCaRAAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJeUwP/A/o6kTwVHof5k9BtVgnn0QE rZ8fYqUTmebUWc1tI4sXK1JsbyEb4yCv2+lqynhA1ilv4zKunJBGnagJMAnPIa1l A20nrZWWlapP9gC/MGW5mGeNGbGLSeckQcwCcewX5puXQOYzUntk3do790XvLhY9 Bg6M0FAbPxDebGZWTrENkjA9r1LcrbPoxAOwmuzeiDDhhqhMB0hm/6v+QA5MNkRt 9JhcaXkP5az5SdnFZX1LyobLiS0iFzLPUVWQ3iwzkzW9Sn/bySz5wk026rLs9t15 9cDc8LdlWmjU32tVGcyr5sSlMacSHu4jaoRqYzOSOFevUpMRK/u/qRZ6D9GCrb12 voxa5MSyBK0KxC16FDfZxOWxXCZhOCJiuzROG47w1oswuEADJ8AW3ipEErwx0BRw H88zx7NCpoqyahmdD31jDDvFo1N+7QK/4PxCl2wWPhTOqtbTDu+/5PwbfITrWmzx OC4jDHbSgpIaAtr/Bad02/tAEd8dQU0KhkHmF+cAJ7jQwrCW0J4k/DTqHDyYDsLy CTBXZinB6+PNrXEVo/Yj5Hpg4fgVHQpmdBPa2/2uzOBLvUIJNeyCap+KEjh6+bGj CTy9bN9+uWLp/PxWcfkNZXXaBP4u4Dm5QcCwuXc3zFl2RF9cr4wOgbIqPdvrV4f6 x0yK4+KF5bqiId22bddS =JWvJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/14/2012 09:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Nope, fix the ambiguity by adding Prefer: mkinitrd:module-init-tools to prjconf...
Ok, just did that, let's see if that resolves the issue.
Yes, looks like it did, thanks, that caused a bunch of other packages to rebuild, hopefully that resolves the problem.
Np. It should fix the issue. It did it for me yesterday when I tried to build it in OBS. thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQpAs0AAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJTQIQAJzzsMEE+G8/GE3PdJbkjEy7 G10H84JeIyB8UBoDo+2/oDrYBptIWGt2kfnhWfDp9esMAdgbBEhesZP4EjnX8kZs ID9s0NoIosaGOPKQG9YzTVDxVHSUYA93oVys9jWRVAOtdcnXz7bA81I9dMEzKLA5 1dHpUTpEruv+E23JxyogxmOaTSXC+pL3NP0enXM8QAe19P1qmKN1KHbCx9mm5XCX GfubuzD/m+5Y8r4e9K0C7muAAifTUrjFdAQYcN3dyP/4oodxPnbnxgDKSdcGhKxM n2YtHE8ctZ8MDpohJ+rUNMd9ndL2dEgVKIUxgs7WoW43cg6reufosnXBodNWkuE7 STqkHYh++VrvLzzG14FmWiwmp8+MUu0nyTp9vRhiSti545f2x1bJbTFPn6pPzdpJ vBaS5Ss/6MttT59ge9DYSEuHRQdzj92qFHpTJhLBrpA0aEJ+tbZzhCc2qvLTjj1z gcl7Tn2glLa51QbSME6ozc2pP6VD2Ky7QXbdjMvQZqzFNWBbBWEj+m/iEpBQd9iz o0zqjKQ+u5N0I0c1TUvpwFeUE9rw3PxeoU/oX91oasKk98WJiWyj7EcTWc6/T4GV 5onQ6c8tX1JfToZi7N0v3sJAqKi7+Z2Z0Ygk8WtMtHXTp4JvgLk1xOtFH0rgICSN JeUAJweezbD9ICmVExWt =0oTn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/14/2012 09:22 PM, Greg KH wrote:
I wonder how the KDE:49 repo got around not having that problem, odd.
Because tumbleweed's version of kmod has this additional line: +Provides: modutils
Also, kdevelop4 is failing with a very weird build error:
[ 1128s] I: Function call needs to pass NULL-pointer as last argument [ 1128s] E: kdevelop4 missing-sentinel /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kdevelop-4.3.1/debuggers/gdb/stty.cpp:336, 343
did it work properly for you?
In IBS: yes, in OBS: no. I have no idea why. Neither I understood that error proper (because, again, in KDE:49 it builds fine). I will compare the log outputs to see the differences later. (But note I did this between KDE:49 and my tumbleweed repo and did find nothing.) thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQpA2rAAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJpu0P/3C1DmtC5YGcm3UQnIDDxPy5 3gJzMIGKtpFCVd/eHWR2h62yXqhPQ0/fKYXE4iAH20RnTuPBZxsEKpR6c87rIDas x084f3ByRHjJ2HpptfDwbn67hOTg5jsqox2LSfcdNikYx8bqZnOacuXjwpi4/pPR KTlunJJrGkuWvRuEvBfjpGOqHfGNdQZXWCyoP30zbtr4vPqMw88O0fTiFHG5y7va Wu38gwOuNC7OIzoLtBk5mR3UbJvKPNZkcg+J5ruLwFlxZWw6yhuf2IBn6zWBo08o V829l+YhWj26e/SPoZoFaI9I/itv/jV+DDw3j2P72xU0JdYbpUSIHWYCokIWQ7IX jTjqPyhGHPNoeqN94DhE9ta1t3BUGQd4Me44vYNW+exbEZ/T2fEy28H3KybIyFAi /occNZqHHcgINmTsxr2OhX52ucrIyf7rXYB5oUcxELjPMI1Td5hPmqfpnDC0l4N+ gTNiMXK4gunfp+VSzkJEDv2HJtnQ9QzyDsnqZsOLJ1F+4sIu9rMyJFKHyy32gfXw rABaEWcBHVDhfxZxlWC2xOyA0fyQcNZB36gH1iluxHE4Rne6YGkycFYmEm2JC5CC HaK2PNSiIHJsVQ8f4QvnsJ6xwx3hK1zaL4dM/H59d/qEBs5WH88sKR0qDKyDCoPb IStocrDSdcwUYi5y8edh =WiaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 11/14/2012 04:31 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11/14/2012 09:22 PM, Greg KH wrote:
I wonder how the KDE:49 repo got around not having that problem, odd.
Because tumbleweed's version of kmod has this additional line: +Provides: modutils
Also, kdevelop4 is failing with a very weird build error:
[ 1128s] I: Function call needs to pass NULL-pointer as last argument [ 1128s] E: kdevelop4 missing-sentinel /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kdevelop-4.3.1/debuggers/gdb/stty.cpp:336, 343
did it work properly for you?
In IBS: yes, in OBS: no. I have no idea why. Neither I understood that error proper (because, again, in KDE:49 it builds fine).
I will compare the log outputs to see the differences later. (But note I did this between KDE:49 and my tumbleweed repo and did find nothing.)
thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQpA2rAAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJpu0P/3C1DmtC5YGcm3UQnIDDxPy5 3gJzMIGKtpFCVd/eHWR2h62yXqhPQ0/fKYXE4iAH20RnTuPBZxsEKpR6c87rIDas x084f3ByRHjJ2HpptfDwbn67hOTg5jsqox2LSfcdNikYx8bqZnOacuXjwpi4/pPR KTlunJJrGkuWvRuEvBfjpGOqHfGNdQZXWCyoP30zbtr4vPqMw88O0fTiFHG5y7va Wu38gwOuNC7OIzoLtBk5mR3UbJvKPNZkcg+J5ruLwFlxZWw6yhuf2IBn6zWBo08o V829l+YhWj26e/SPoZoFaI9I/itv/jV+DDw3j2P72xU0JdYbpUSIHWYCokIWQ7IX jTjqPyhGHPNoeqN94DhE9ta1t3BUGQd4Me44vYNW+exbEZ/T2fEy28H3KybIyFAi /occNZqHHcgINmTsxr2OhX52ucrIyf7rXYB5oUcxELjPMI1Td5hPmqfpnDC0l4N+ gTNiMXK4gunfp+VSzkJEDv2HJtnQ9QzyDsnqZsOLJ1F+4sIu9rMyJFKHyy32gfXw rABaEWcBHVDhfxZxlWC2xOyA0fyQcNZB36gH1iluxHE4Rne6YGkycFYmEm2JC5CC HaK2PNSiIHJsVQ8f4QvnsJ6xwx3hK1zaL4dM/H59d/qEBs5WH88sKR0qDKyDCoPb IStocrDSdcwUYi5y8edh =WiaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
So are we good to go today? -- Cheers! Roman --------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! --------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu 15 Nov 2012 11:08:44 AM EST, Roman Bysh wrote:
On 11/14/2012 04:31 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11/14/2012 09:22 PM, Greg KH wrote:
I wonder how the KDE:49 repo got around not having that problem, odd.
Because tumbleweed's version of kmod has this additional line: +Provides: modutils
Also, kdevelop4 is failing with a very weird build error:
[ 1128s] I: Function call needs to pass NULL-pointer as last argument [ 1128s] E: kdevelop4 missing-sentinel /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kdevelop-4.3.1/debuggers/gdb/stty.cpp:336, 343
did it work properly for you?
In IBS: yes, in OBS: no. I have no idea why. Neither I understood that error proper (because, again, in KDE:49 it builds fine).
I will compare the log outputs to see the differences later. (But note I did this between KDE:49 and my tumbleweed repo and did find nothing.)
thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQpA2rAAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJpu0P/3C1DmtC5YGcm3UQnIDDxPy5 3gJzMIGKtpFCVd/eHWR2h62yXqhPQ0/fKYXE4iAH20RnTuPBZxsEKpR6c87rIDas x084f3ByRHjJ2HpptfDwbn67hOTg5jsqox2LSfcdNikYx8bqZnOacuXjwpi4/pPR KTlunJJrGkuWvRuEvBfjpGOqHfGNdQZXWCyoP30zbtr4vPqMw88O0fTiFHG5y7va Wu38gwOuNC7OIzoLtBk5mR3UbJvKPNZkcg+J5ruLwFlxZWw6yhuf2IBn6zWBo08o V829l+YhWj26e/SPoZoFaI9I/itv/jV+DDw3j2P72xU0JdYbpUSIHWYCokIWQ7IX jTjqPyhGHPNoeqN94DhE9ta1t3BUGQd4Me44vYNW+exbEZ/T2fEy28H3KybIyFAi /occNZqHHcgINmTsxr2OhX52ucrIyf7rXYB5oUcxELjPMI1Td5hPmqfpnDC0l4N+ gTNiMXK4gunfp+VSzkJEDv2HJtnQ9QzyDsnqZsOLJ1F+4sIu9rMyJFKHyy32gfXw rABaEWcBHVDhfxZxlWC2xOyA0fyQcNZB36gH1iluxHE4Rne6YGkycFYmEm2JC5CC HaK2PNSiIHJsVQ8f4QvnsJ6xwx3hK1zaL4dM/H59d/qEBs5WH88sKR0qDKyDCoPb IStocrDSdcwUYi5y8edh =WiaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
So are we good to go today?
Well... I downloaded and installed it yesterday. Except for the branding it felt stable. -- Cheers! Roman --------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! --------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:47:37AM -0500, Romanator wrote:
So are we good to go today?
Well... I downloaded and installed it yesterday. Except for the branding it felt stable.
Interesting given that it still isn't finished building :) So you really don't have all of the update, look at the version number of kwin as an example. Hopefully it should be finished in 12 hours or so... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu 15 Nov 2012 09:57:51 PM EST, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:47:37AM -0500, Romanator wrote:
So are we good to go today?
Well... I downloaded and installed it yesterday. Except for the branding it felt stable.
Interesting given that it still isn't finished building :)
So you really don't have all of the update, look at the version number of kwin as an example. Hopefully it should be finished in 12 hours or so...
thanks,
greg k-h
It's 4.9.3 "release 2". -- Cheers! Roman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:48:11AM -0500, Roman Bysh wrote:
On Thu 15 Nov 2012 09:57:51 PM EST, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:47:37AM -0500, Romanator wrote:
So are we good to go today?
Well... I downloaded and installed it yesterday. Except for the branding it felt stable.
Interesting given that it still isn't finished building :)
So you really don't have all of the update, look at the version number of kwin as an example. Hopefully it should be finished in 12 hours or so...
thanks,
greg k-h
It's 4.9.3 "release 2".
Great, I've done some more testing, and it looks good to me, so I'll move it into the "real" tumbleweed repo now. Should take a day or so to rebuild everything and then get pushed to the world. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Fri 16 Nov 2012 12:46:03 PM EST, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:48:11AM -0500, Roman Bysh wrote:
On Thu 15 Nov 2012 09:57:51 PM EST, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:47:37AM -0500, Romanator wrote:
So are we good to go today?
Well... I downloaded and installed it yesterday. Except for the branding it felt stable.
Interesting given that it still isn't finished building :)
So you really don't have all of the update, look at the version number of kwin as an example. Hopefully it should be finished in 12 hours or so...
thanks,
greg k-h
It's 4.9.3 "release 2".
Great, I've done some more testing, and it looks good to me, so I'll move it into the "real" tumbleweed repo now.
Should take a day or so to rebuild everything and then get pushed to the world.
thanks,
greg k-h
Thanks Greg, Agreed. I like what I see. If all goes well Monday can be the day to download? -- Cheers! Roman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:26:54PM -0500, Roman Bysh wrote:
Agreed. I like what I see. If all goes well Monday can be the day to download?
I have no idea, it all depends on how fast the build system is this weekend. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Greg KH writes:
Great, I've done some more testing, and it looks good to me, so I'll move it into the "real" tumbleweed repo now.
Should take a day or so to rebuild everything and then get pushed to the world.
I've updated to KDE 4.9.3 just fine (I did remember to revert the gratuitous changes to /usr/share/kde4/config/kdm this time). After a reboot zypper wants to downgrade to 4.8.5 since these three old patches intervene: openSUSE-2012-588, openSUSE-2012-701, openSUSE-2012-685. I've locked them and that seems to take care of everything and verify says that the system is good. The error from the patch check does not make much sense to me: Problem: kdebase4-workspace-4.9.3-2.1.i586 requires kdebase4-workspace-branding = 4.9.3, but this requirement cannot be provided uninstallable providers: kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586[Tumbleweed] kdebase4-workspace-branding-basedonopensuse-12.2-3.7.1.i586[current-Update] kdebase4-workspace-branding-basedonopensuse-12.2-3.3.1.i586[openSUSE-current-OSS] but maybe this gives somebody else an idea of where to look. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 09:07:29AM +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
Greg KH writes:
Great, I've done some more testing, and it looks good to me, so I'll move it into the "real" tumbleweed repo now.
Should take a day or so to rebuild everything and then get pushed to the world.
I've updated to KDE 4.9.3 just fine (I did remember to revert the gratuitous changes to /usr/share/kde4/config/kdm this time). After a reboot zypper wants to downgrade to 4.8.5 since these three old patches intervene: openSUSE-2012-588, openSUSE-2012-701, openSUSE-2012-685.
What are they and where did they come from?
I've locked them and that seems to take care of everything and verify says that the system is good.
The error from the patch check does not make much sense to me:
Problem: kdebase4-workspace-4.9.3-2.1.i586 requires kdebase4-workspace-branding = 4.9.3, but this requirement cannot be provided uninstallable providers: kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586[Tumbleweed] kdebase4-workspace-branding-basedonopensuse-12.2-3.7.1.i586[current-Update] kdebase4-workspace-branding-basedonopensuse-12.2-3.3.1.i586[openSUSE-current-OSS]
but maybe this gives somebody else an idea of where to look.
I don't really know, anyone else have a clue? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Greg KH writes:
I've updated to KDE 4.9.3 just fine (I did remember to revert the gratuitous changes to /usr/share/kde4/config/kdm this time). After a reboot zypper wants to downgrade to 4.8.5 since these three old patches intervene: openSUSE-2012-588, openSUSE-2012-701, openSUSE-2012-685.
What are they and where did they come from?
One dealt with a problem when upgrading to 4.8.5, another one with a problem upgrading the system from earlier than 12.1 and I don't remember what the third was for. They are all from the "current" (aka 12.2) update repo. I don't know why zypper thinks they should be applied again. Regards Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/2012 09:07 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
The error from the patch check does not make much sense to me:
Problem: kdebase4-workspace-4.9.3-2.1.i586 requires kdebase4-workspace-branding = 4.9.3, but this requirement cannot be provided uninstallable providers: kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586[Tumbleweed] kdebase4-workspace-branding-basedonopensuse-12.2-3.7.1.i586[current-Update]
kdebase4-workspace-branding-basedonopensuse-12.2-3.3.1.i586[openSUSE-current-OSS] What happens when you install that exact version like: # zypper in kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586 It should write why it is actually uninstallable. thanks, - -- js suse labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQqMvCAAoJEL0lsQQGtHBJYBMP/RlB0FKfVWOG8DRU4mYKL1l6 DlmFVhwqTpHpXEK+y5+QkoRkUNU8l5VR9PPNJFO7OupiGaLo8nXi7iox7m4htjJ+ GhLwc1CX3+hNhPE8Xlz8bzbwMbDMgS9TIXG24L8jD23d/MzZxh+o5TItkxMqluf3 3eh5jEcNomPZydX1qNoYnP/pysHVfUyH/WJ/OPazMRAJMlvnPopyCHzzSJWXuSsJ ufYnIYN43O/asUlivxaRBtEEMrQENyeuWBZYmOzpuhRhQzyTWUNvOGuvrIA/qQat fR8GDFZWZQ+ZGtZZ5K9i0GgxtbCTi6w6WacgS0vPjYan+Uz2GvBKLNV/akLG4RAL OoHwa9MUUEdXd2Gnf53X5CRodZy4No9L34Mr6mWDXoXdb06ac/i9RvtfxufrQGbA FMd9GEo9WlG1bUakBIAJb6OgVp3w9crtTHYYMnjWBEZMzgmDv3kdgCW6ZQkyCOqL p02Guea1DeUSCrzOICkIwHiEALUDwBTmi6VUnF0nTR//7KaO46Yz7JBNeJYlTNjS ifL+2svJd/dl5DLrCfR+AyEbgXWm+35pDC4RacrOi+7BYUYyvlP6B+Gxqmb024SS FfxHzgkp+jKfttgGD4wp3IarbvqsnclXFc2bfYfCsTR4Tdg3akK6FYDLqP/jV6YM cxDMYBfmifTBUgXyrqrw =B9ok -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
in kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586
Problem: kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586 conflicts with namespace:otherproviders(kdebase4-workspace-branding) provided by kdebase4-workspace-branding-openSUSE-12.2-2.1.i586 Solution 1: deinstallation of kdebase4-workspace-branding-openSUSE-12.2-2.1.i586 Solution 2: do not install kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586 Choose from above solutions by number or cancel [1/2/c] (c): Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 12:56:00 schrieb Achim Gratz:
in kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586
Problem: kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586 conflicts with namespace:otherproviders(kdebase4-workspace-branding) provided by kdebase4-workspace-branding-openSUSE-12.2-2.1.i586 Solution 1: deinstallation of kdebase4-workspace-branding-openSUSE-12.2-2.1.i586 Solution 2: do not install kdebase4-workspace-branding-upstream-4.9.3-2.1.i586
Choose from above solutions by number or cancel [1/2/c] (c):
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE. Sven -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Sven Burmeister writes:
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE.
That wasn't the question. The question is why the installed KDE 4.9.3 gets picked up by those three old patches to not provide "kdebase4-branding==4.9.3" and then tries to downgrade it to KDE 4.8.5. Regards Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 15:02:38 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Sven Burmeister writes:
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE.
That wasn't the question. The question is why the installed KDE 4.9.3 gets picked up by those three old patches to not provide "kdebase4-branding==4.9.3" and then tries to downgrade it to KDE 4.8.5.
The bit you quoted showed the conflict I referred to. On top of that you might have hit: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736100 Sven -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun 18 Nov 2012 10:43:26 AM EST, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 15:02:38 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Sven Burmeister writes:
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE.
That wasn't the question. The question is why the installed KDE 4.9.3 gets picked up by those three old patches to not provide "kdebase4-branding==4.9.3" and then tries to downgrade it to KDE 4.8.5.
The bit you quoted showed the conflict I referred to.
On top of that you might have hit:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736100
Sven
Yep. We need a patch to patch the patch ;-) -- Cheers! Roman --------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! --------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 11/18/2012 10:43 AM, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 15:02:38 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Sven Burmeister writes:
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE.
That wasn't the question. The question is why the installed KDE 4.9.3 gets picked up by those three old patches to not provide "kdebase4-branding==4.9.3" and then tries to downgrade it to KDE 4.8.5.
The bit you quoted showed the conflict I referred to.
On top of that you might have hit:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736100
Sven
I don't understand why 140 packages must be downgraded when upgrading from 4.8.5 to 4.9.3. It's this downgrade that is contributing to the loop. Maybe Yast should be used instead of zypper dup. Cheers! Roman --------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! --------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:30:17PM -0500, Roman Bysh wrote:
On 11/18/2012 10:43 AM, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 15:02:38 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Sven Burmeister writes:
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE.
That wasn't the question. The question is why the installed KDE 4.9.3 gets picked up by those three old patches to not provide "kdebase4-branding==4.9.3" and then tries to downgrade it to KDE 4.8.5.
The bit you quoted showed the conflict I referred to.
On top of that you might have hit:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736100
Sven
I don't understand why 140 packages must be downgraded when upgrading from 4.8.5 to 4.9.3.
What packages are downgrading? Did you previously already have KDE 4.9.3 on your system from a different repo? Like maybe the Tumbleweed:Testing repo? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun 18 Nov 2012 01:25:34 PM EST, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:30:17PM -0500, Roman Bysh wrote:
On 11/18/2012 10:43 AM, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 15:02:38 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Sven Burmeister writes:
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE.
That wasn't the question. The question is why the installed KDE 4.9.3 gets picked up by those three old patches to not provide "kdebase4-branding==4.9.3" and then tries to downgrade it to KDE 4.8.5.
The bit you quoted showed the conflict I referred to.
On top of that you might have hit:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736100
Sven
I don't understand why 140 packages must be downgraded when upgrading from 4.8.5 to 4.9.3.
What packages are downgrading? Did you previously already have KDE 4.9.3 on your system from a different repo? Like maybe the Tumbleweed:Testing repo?
thanks,
greg k-h
Sorry. I just reinstalled openSUSE. The Tumbleweed Testing repo was installed in VirtualBox. I will follow up tomorrow with the results of "zypper dup". Cheers! Roman --------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! --------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun 18 Nov 2012 06:23:44 PM EST, Roman Bysh wrote:
On Sun 18 Nov 2012 01:25:34 PM EST, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:30:17PM -0500, Roman Bysh wrote:
On 11/18/2012 10:43 AM, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 15:02:38 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Sven Burmeister writes:
You can only have either openSUSE branding or upstream branding. Hence installing upstream will ask you to remove openSUSE.
That wasn't the question. The question is why the installed KDE 4.9.3 gets picked up by those three old patches to not provide "kdebase4-branding==4.9.3" and then tries to downgrade it to KDE 4.8.5.
The bit you quoted showed the conflict I referred to.
On top of that you might have hit:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736100
Sven
I don't understand why 140 packages must be downgraded when upgrading from 4.8.5 to 4.9.3.
What packages are downgrading? Did you previously already have KDE 4.9.3 on your system from a different repo? Like maybe the Tumbleweed:Testing repo?
thanks,
greg k-h
Sorry. I just reinstalled openSUSE.
The Tumbleweed Testing repo was installed in VirtualBox.
I will follow up tomorrow with the results of "zypper dup".
Cheers!
Roman
Yesterday. I think I had a repo enabled that shouldn't have been included in when running "zypper dup". Today. I tried again. This time I had 40 downgrades when running "zypper dup". Does zypper write to a file the message shown when after I typed "zypper dup" while in console mode? Where is it? Cheers! Roman --------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! --------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
* Roman Bysh <rbtc1@rogers.com> [11-19-12 14:14]: ...
Yesterday. I think I had a repo enabled that shouldn't have been included in when running "zypper dup".
Today. I tried again. This time I had 40 downgrades when running "zypper dup".
Does zypper write to a file the message shown when after I typed "zypper dup" while in console mode? Where is it?
Please take the time to trim your quoting. tks The "Test:" repo had 4.9.3-2.2 and the 4.9 presented since the test repo was cleared is 4.9.3-2.1, causing downgrade. But I have seen no problem. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2012-11-19 14:12 (GMT-0500) Roman Bysh composed:
Does zypper write to a file the message shown when after I typed "zypper dup" while in console mode? Where is it?
Maybe what you want can be found in /var/log/zypp/history or /var/log/zypper.log. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
* Greg KH <gregkh@linux.com> [11-14-12 11:38]:
Thanks to Jiri for doing the heavy lifting, it looks like KDE 4.9 is almost ready to push to openSUSE:Tumbleweed. Right now it's built in openSUSE:Tumbleweed:Testing and seems to work for me, but it would be great if someone who really knows (and uses) KDE to actually test it out to verify it's all sane.
So, could someone add this repo to their system, do a 'zypper dup' and let me know if they have any problems?
just added repo and doing dupdate, will advise shortly. tks, -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
* Patrick Shanahan <paka@opensuse.org> [11-14-12 12:41]:
* Greg KH <gregkh@linux.com> [11-14-12 11:38]:
Thanks to Jiri for doing the heavy lifting, it looks like KDE 4.9 is almost ready to push to openSUSE:Tumbleweed. Right now it's built in openSUSE:Tumbleweed:Testing and seems to work for me, but it would be great if someone who really knows (and uses) KDE to actually test it out to verify it's all sane.
So, could someone add this repo to their system, do a 'zypper dup' and let me know if they have any problems?
just added repo and doing dupdate, will advise shortly.
Just saw your 2nd email re this subj, will pause :^) tks, -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (9)
-
Achim Gratz -
Felix Miata -
Greg KH -
Jiri Slaby -
Patrick Shanahan -
Raymond Wooninck -
Roman Bysh -
Romanator
-
Sven Burmeister