On 4 October 2017 at 13:32, Stephan Kulow wrote:

On 10/03/2017 08:37 PM, Jason Record wrote:

...

All,

I would like to white list some packages that I need to submit to openSUSE:Factory as part of the "first policy". These packages need to be in SLES15. They are already included in SLE12 SP*. They are:

sca-appliance-agent sca-appliance-broker sca-appliance-common sca-appliance-patdev

sca-patterns-base sca-patterns-hae sca-patterns-oes sca-patterns-sle11 sca-patterns-sle12 sca-patterns-suma

sca-server-report

supportutils

I think you misunderstood the policy. We don't need things in openSUSE:Factory that have 0 relevance in openSUSE. These sound a lot like SUSE specific meta packages.

Greetings, Stephan

I believe they are needed by supportutils And there are certainly some people who would like supportconfig in openSUSE https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2017-08/msg01134.html Not only some of our users and bug triagers, but I'd like it to reduce the manual diff I currently have to carry in Kubic to compensate for the lack of supportutils compared to SUSE's CaaS Platform. So, while you're right, we dont want to carry stuff with zero relevance to openSUSE, in this case, there is relevance. Regards, Richard -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

On 4 October 2017 at 14:42, Stephan Kulow wrote:

On 10/04/2017 01:39 PM, Richard Brown wrote:

...

On 4 October 2017 at 13:32, Stephan Kulow wrote:

...

On 10/03/2017 08:37 PM, Jason Record wrote:

...

All,

I would like to white list some packages that I need to submit to openSUSE:Factory as part of the "first policy". These packages need to be in SLES15. They are already included in SLE12 SP*. They are:

sca-appliance-agent sca-appliance-broker sca-appliance-common sca-appliance-patdev

sca-patterns-base sca-patterns-hae sca-patterns-oes sca-patterns-sle11 sca-patterns-sle12 sca-patterns-suma

sca-server-report

supportutils

I think you misunderstood the policy. We don't need things in openSUSE:Factory that have 0 relevance in openSUSE. These sound a lot like SUSE specific meta packages.

Greetings, Stephan

I believe they are needed by supportutils

And there are certainly some people who would like supportconfig in openSUSE

https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2017-08/msg01134.html

Not only some of our users and bug triagers, but I'd like it to reduce the manual diff I currently have to carry in Kubic to compensate for the lack of supportutils compared to SUSE's CaaS Platform.

Ok, then let me ask this: who is going to maintain these packages for Tumbleweed and Leap?

Greetings, Stephan

Jason Record ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org