Marcus, On Monday 06 November 2006 07:38, Marcus Rueckert wrote:

...

just for the logic: ext3 - obsolete

Are you serious? You really believe ext3 is obsolete? That seems odd, given how widely used it is. Even FAT is not obsolete and it's archaic. Perhaps you mean "obsolescent?" I.e., in the process of becoming obsolete but not yet there. Anyway, could you clarify this statement?

...

darix

Randall Schulz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org

Marcus, Juan, On Monday 06 November 2006 07:52, Marcus Rueckert wrote:

On 2006-11-06 07:44:53 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:

...

On Monday 06 November 2006 07:38, Marcus Rueckert wrote:

...

just for the logic: ext3 - obsolete

Are you serious? You really believe ext3 is obsolete? That seems odd, given how widely used it is. Even FAT is not obsolete and it's archaic. Perhaps you mean "obsolescent?" I.e., in the process of becoming obsolete but not yet there.

Anyway, could you clarify this statement?

i just quoted the author of the other mail. he stated that ext3 is obsolete, so i wonder what one should use than.

Sorry. I misunderstood the quoting. I see it is Juan Erbes to whom my comments / questions are directed. Juan?

darix

Randall Schulz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org

On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:25:14PM -0300, Juan Erbes wrote:

2006/11/6, Randall R Schulz :

...

Marcus,

On Monday 06 November 2006 07:38, Marcus Rueckert wrote:

...

...

just for the logic: ext3 - obsolete

Are you serious? You really believe ext3 is obsolete? That seems odd, given how widely used it is. Even FAT is not obsolete and it's archaic. Perhaps you mean "obsolescent?" I.e., in the process of becoming obsolete but not yet there.

Anyway, could you clarify this statement?

I believe ext3 is obsolete, because it resembles the old times, when I power on the computer to send a email, and I have only 5 minutes to leave my house, and the system just this day uses 15 minutes for the montly fsck. With Reiserfs I forgot completely this problem, and the system is usable any time I need it. For a desktop computer, I mean that ext3 is not a better option than reiserfs. Ext3 is retro.

Then just use reiserfs for your machine. :) Ciao, Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org