[opensuse-factory] List of Failures in staging projects
Hi, In case someone is bored today, here are the list of build failures ;) openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc48 capi4hylafax ccache gjdoc gnome-session go go-Go-OpenGL inkscape libgcj47 libopensync libopensync-plugin-opie libsatsolver lighttpd lilo mISDNuser mozc openttd-opengfx perf ppl-testsuite python3-base samba strigi uwsgi v8 xplatproviders openSUSE:Factory:Staging:perl518 ack apache2-mod_perl apparmor automake-testsuite collectd devscripts hugin kdeaddons3 kdebase3 kdebindings3 libcamgm lighttpd perf perl-MIME-tools perl-PDF-API2 perl-Template-Toolkit perl-Tk po4a rsnapshot samba squid stellarium wireshark xen Please note that would like to go forward with these projects, so I really need people to look at their or other packages. Some packages are of course more important than others, but e.g. samba is on both lists ;( Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Monday 2013-06-24 10:44, Stephan Kulow wrote:
In case someone is bored today, here are the list of build failures ;)
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc48 samba
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:perl518 samba
Please note that would like to go forward with these projects, so I really need people to look at their or other packages. Some packages are of course more important than others, but e.g. samba is on both lists ;(
Could it be that the samba maintainer(s) have Hermes email notifications disabled? To the best of my knowledge, a not insignificant amount of my SRs to the samba bsprj have been ignored good. The acl/attr/cyrus/openldap/openssl is just the newest one on the list.. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hello, Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:perl518 apparmor
I'm slightly ;-) confused because it fails at a (for a new perl version) very unexpected place. The build seems to run into an endless loop while generating HTML documentation with latex2html: [ 996s] latex2html -show_section_numbers -split 0 -noinfo -nonavigation -noaddress techdoc.tex [ 997s] defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/bin/latex2html line 517. [ 997s] (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) [ 997s] defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/bin/latex2html line 2094. [ 997s] (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) [ 997s] defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/bin/latex2html line 9105. [ 997s] (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) [ 997s] This is LaTeX2HTML Version 2008 (1.71) [...] [ 998s] 10/32:subsection:..."3.6 Why are the computed pathnames meaningful?" for techdoc.html [ 998s] ;...,,.......;.. [ 998s] [ 998s] 11/32:subsection:..."3.7 Path Permission Checking" for techdoc.html [ 998s] ;.....;. [ 998s] [ 998s] 12/32:subsection:...."3.8 Profile Permissions" for techdoc.html [ 2614s] ;..,,......................................................................................... [... _lots_ of dots_ ...] ..................................Out of memory! [ 9666s] /.build/build: fork: Cannot allocate memory [ 9719s] [ 9694.667467] Out of memory: Kill process 25129 (^.*$) score 970 or sacrifice child [ 9719s] [ 9694.668589] Killed process 25129 (^.*$) total-vm:2743044kB, anon-rss:659104kB, file-rss:156kB [ 9721s] make: *** [techdoc/index.html] Killed Does someone (Petr?) have an idea what could cause this problem? Besides the deprecation notes at [996s] and [997s], I didn't see something that looks like an error message (but the verbose output could easily hide something). BTW: the message about killing the process looks a bit strange: [ 9719s] [ 9694.668589] Killed process 25129 (^.*$) total-vm:2743044kB, anon-rss:659104kB, file-rss:156kB I'd guess the ^.*$ should be somehow replaced ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Working in a datacentre is the next best thing to being talented and popular. I get to spend hours surrounded by thousands of screaming fans [http://twitter.com/_gmh_/status/80741758358654977] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 24.06.2013 13:25, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:perl518 apparmor
I'm slightly ;-) confused because it fails at a (for a new perl version) very unexpected place.
The build seems to run into an endless loop while generating HTML documentation with latex2html:
[ 996s] latex2html -show_section_numbers -split 0 -noinfo -nonavigation -noaddress techdoc.tex [ 997s] defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/bin/latex2html line 517. [ 997s] (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) [ 997s] defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/bin/latex2html line 2094. [ 997s] (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) [ 997s] defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/bin/latex2html line 9105. [ 997s] (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) [ 997s] This is LaTeX2HTML Version 2008 (1.71) [...] [ 998s] 10/32:subsection:..."3.6 Why are the computed pathnames meaningful?" for techdoc.html [ 998s] ;...,,.......;.. [ 998s] [ 998s] 11/32:subsection:..."3.7 Path Permission Checking" for techdoc.html [ 998s] ;.....;. [ 998s] [ 998s] 12/32:subsection:...."3.8 Profile Permissions" for techdoc.html [ 2614s] ;..,,......................................................................................... [... _lots_ of dots_ ...] ..................................Out of memory! [ 9666s] /.build/build: fork: Cannot allocate memory
As fork runs out of memory, the chances are high that this is actually a fork bomb. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 24.06.2013 13:25, Christian Boltz wrote:
Does someone (Petr?) have an idea what could cause this problem?
Besides the deprecation notes at [996s] and [997s], I didn't see something that looks like an error message (but the verbose output could easily hide something).
BTW: the message about killing the process looks a bit strange: [ 9719s] [ 9694.668589] Killed process 25129 (^.*$) total-vm:2743044kB, anon-rss:659104kB, file-rss:156kB I'd guess the ^.*$ should be somehow replaced ;-)
If you build apparmor, you'll notice this process too: 32513 399 20 0 166m 129m 2324 R 99,8 0,8 1:29.53 ^.*$ rpmbuild(27876)───sh(27960)───make(32343)───^.*$(32513) Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:10, Stephan Kulow <coolo@...> wrote:
On 24.06.2013 13:25, Christian Boltz wrote:
Does someone (Petr?) have an idea what could cause this problem?
Besides the deprecation notes at [996s] and [997s], I didn't see something that looks like an error message (but the verbose output could easily hide something).
BTW: the message about killing the process looks a bit strange: [ 9719s] [ 9694.668589] Killed process 25129 (^.*$) total-vm:2743044kB, anon-rss:659104kB, file-rss:156kB I'd guess the ^.*$ should be somehow replaced ;-)
If you build apparmor, you'll notice this process too:
32513 399 20 0 166m 129m 2324 R 99,8 0,8 1:29.53 ^.*$
rpmbuild(27876)───sh(27960)───make(32343)───^.*$(32513)
And this reeks of fail! Any regex for files should at least exclude "." and "..". Here the save regex would be at minimum "^....*$". (better something like "^\.?[^\.].*$" ) Either "make" (here gnu-make) or the makefile of the project itself is not fit for use. Sorry for the rant, too much hunting such bugs in the past. - Yamaban.
Yamaban <foerster@lisas.de> writes:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:10, Stephan Kulow <coolo@...> wrote:
If you build apparmor, you'll notice this process too:
32513 399 20 0 166m 129m 2324 R 99,8 0,8 1:29.53 ^.*$
rpmbuild(27876)───sh(27960)───make(32343)───^.*$(32513)
And this reeks of fail! Any regex for files should at least exclude "." and "..".
$ echo 'main(){for(;;);}' | gcc -o '^.*$' -xc -; ./'^.*$' & pstree -p $$; kill $! [1] 6451 bash(32188)─┬─^.*$(6451) └─pstree(6452) Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 24.06.2013 13:25, Christian Boltz wrote:
Does someone (Petr?) have an idea what could cause this problem?
So the bug has nothing to do with apparmor (beside possibly unexpected tex constructs), but our latex2html is buggy. To prove that I added a %check to latex2html using apparmor's tex. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Monday 24 Jun 2013 10:44:17 Stephan Kulow wrote:
go
Go version 1.1.1 which will fix this build is sitting in devel:languages:go for a while now but I had been holding off with an SR to factory due to build failures on i586 (BNC#818502). Do you want an SR now or will I wait until a newer RPM arrives in factory?
go-Go-OpenGL
Please see request: #180745 Cheers the noo, Graham -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 24.06.2013 14:51, Graham Anderson wrote:
On Monday 24 Jun 2013 10:44:17 Stephan Kulow wrote:
go
Go version 1.1.1 which will fix this build is sitting in devel:languages:go for a while now but I had been holding off with an SR to factory due to build failures on i586 (BNC#818502). Do you want an SR now or will I wait until a newer RPM arrives in factory?
No reason to replace one build failure with another - I just build disable go in the staging project. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 06/24/2013 02:51 PM, Graham Anderson wrote:
On Monday 24 Jun 2013 10:44:17 Stephan Kulow wrote:
go
Go version 1.1.1 which will fix this build is sitting in devel:languages:go for a while now but I had been holding off with an SR to factory due to build failures on i586 (BNC#818502). Do you want an SR now or will I wait until a newer RPM arrives in factory?
I have to admit that I saw those and didn't found the time to look into them.
go-Go-OpenGL
Please see request: #180745
Fine with me. -- Sascha Peilicke SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
2013/6/24 Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de>:
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:perl518
po4a
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/180774 to devel:languages:perl Regards, Luiz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
El 24/06/13 04:44, Stephan Kulow escribió:
libopensync
Already fixed that one 6 days ago.. after your previous email about gcc48 fails, request 179596 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (11)
-
Andreas Schwab -
Christian Boltz -
Cristian Rodríguez -
Graham Anderson -
Jan Engelhardt -
Luiz Fernando Ranghetti -
Mike Gorse -
pgajdos＠suse.cz -
Sascha Peilicke -
Stephan Kulow -
Yamaban