Hi,
To illustrate the staging workflow, there is now a dashboard showing the various projects and their health status. As there are various components involved, the view obviously simplifies - but it should be good enough for everyone to see where we are:
https://build.opensuse.org/factory/staging_projects
Greetings, Stephan
On 30 July 2014 20:40, Stephan Kulow coolo@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
To illustrate the staging workflow, there is now a dashboard showing the various projects and their health status. As there are various components involved, the view obviously simplifies - but it should be good enough for everyone to see where we are:
https://build.opensuse.org/factory/staging_projects
Greetings, Stephan
Regarding the names of the staging products..Are A B C D E F, etc totally arbitrary? That's the most confusing thing I find with this staging concept
I understand this is probably so we can change the 'role' for each of these staging products as incoming packages demand, but it would be nice if we could have some kind of 'nickname' or 'description' for the purposes of this dashboard so it's easier to understand the logic behind why packages XYZ have been grouped together in a staging project before reaching factory
Just a thought..
- Rich
Am 30.07.2014 23:04, schrieb Richard Brown:
On 30 July 2014 20:40, Stephan Kulow coolo@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
To illustrate the staging workflow, there is now a dashboard showing the various projects and their health status. As there are various components involved, the view obviously simplifies - but it should be good enough for everyone to see where we are:
https://build.opensuse.org/factory/staging_projects
Greetings, Stephan
Regarding the names of the staging products..Are A B C D E F, etc totally arbitrary?
They are.
Greetings, Stephan
Hey,
On 31.07.2014 07:13, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 30.07.2014 23:04, schrieb Richard Brown:
On 30 July 2014 20:40, Stephan Kulow coolo@suse.de wrote:
Regarding the names of the staging products..Are A B C D E F, etc totally arbitrary?
They are.
You're still hurting from #Fichtegate don't you? :-)
Henne
Richard Brown wrote:
On 30 July 2014 20:40, Stephan Kulow coolo@suse.de wrote:
To illustrate the staging workflow, there is now a dashboard showing the various projects and their health status. As there are various components involved, the view obviously simplifies - but it should be good enough for everyone to see where we are:
https://build.opensuse.org/factory/staging_projects
Greetings, Stephan
Regarding the names of the staging products..Are A B C D E F, etc totally arbitrary? That's the most confusing thing I find with this staging concept
I understand this is probably so we can change the 'role' for each of these staging products as incoming packages demand, but it would be nice if we could have some kind of 'nickname' or 'description' for the purposes of this dashboard so it's easier to understand the logic behind why packages XYZ have been grouped together in a staging project before reaching factory
Most of the time there actually is no specific reason why packages are grouped together. Packages just end up in the same project to avoid having an overly large number of staging projects.
cu Ludwig
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:40:56PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
To illustrate the staging workflow, there is now a dashboard showing the various projects and their health status. As there are various components involved, the view obviously simplifies - but it should be good enough for everyone to see where we are:
I like it.
Petr
On 30.07.2014 22:40, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Nice.
p.s. I have not got, where the reviewer should choose staging project?
On 31.07.2014 09:17, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
On 30.07.2014 22:40, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Nice.
p.s. I have not got, where the reviewer should choose staging project?
What reviewer? The staging manager (Max Lin) picks the staging project depending on workload. For everyone else the staging project process is basically transparent - that is the reason why we needed a dashboard: to show why packages are delayed to pass to factory.
Greetings, Stephan
On 31.07.2014 12:23, Stephan Kulow wrote:
What reviewer? The staging manager (Max Lin) picks the staging project depending on workload. For everyone else the staging project process is basically transparent - that is the reason why we needed a dashboard: to show why packages are delayed to pass to factory.
Ok, now it is clear, thank you.
Stephan Kulow coolo@suse.de writes:
‐ is not a standard HTML entity, you'll either want – or —.
Andreas.
On 07/30/2014 08:40 PM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
To illustrate the staging workflow, there is now a dashboard showing the various projects and their health status.
Cool{,o} page!
Just out of curiosity: what do the little symbols besides the package names stand for, e.g. the flag? (The legend only explains colors.)
Thanks & have a nice day, Berny
Am 01.08.2014 22:30, schrieb Bernhard Voelker:
Just out of curiosity: what do the little symbols besides the package names stand for, e.g. the flag? (The legend only explains colors.)
Yeah, we already discussed to add the icons to the legend - but we also need better icons.
The icons represent missing reviews:
opensuse-review-team is http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icon/users/
factory-repo-checker is http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icon/flag/
legal-team is http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icon/graduation-cap/
Greetings, Stephan
-
Andreas Schwab -
Bernhard Voelker -
Henne Vogelsang -
Ludwig Nussel -
Matwey V. Kornilov -
Petr Gajdos -
Richard Brown -
Stephan Kulow