UsrMerge testing
Hi, All packages that contained compat symlinks or needed other adjustments for the UsrMerge are checked into Factory! The staging tests passed openQA. That means the switch to activate the UsrMerge could be flipped any time if wanted. When the UsrMerge gets activated, the TW engines will choke a bit until everything has settled again. So Dominique has to find the right timing I guess :-) Meanwhile testers are welcome. The affected packages are rebuild with UsrMerge enabled in a sub project of Factory. If you have a spare installation or are adventurous you may try it out: # zypper ar -fc http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Factory:/UsrMerge/openSU... usrmerge # zypper dup Beware that those packages are links to Factory, so might be a bit ahead of Tumbleweed. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Hi,
All packages that contained compat symlinks or needed other adjustments for the UsrMerge are checked into Factory! The staging tests passed openQA. That means the switch to activate the UsrMerge could be flipped any time if wanted. When the UsrMerge gets activated, the TW engines will choke a bit until everything has settled again. So Dominique has to find the right timing I guess :-)
Supposedly together with the GCC 11 mass-rebuild. GCC 11.1 was just released and there are only a few failing packages left in Staging:Gcc7. -- Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 15:44 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Supposedly together with the GCC 11 mass-rebuild. GCC 11.1 was just released and there are only a few failing packages left in Staging:Gcc7.
That does indeed sound a like a realistic target. In :Gcc7, we currently see only a handful of builds failing: https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7?defaults=0&failed=1&unresolvable=1&broken=1&locked=1&deleting=1&arch_i586=1&arch_x86_64=1&repo_standard=1 Everybody is invited to help fix the failures. Cheers, Dominique
On 4/27/21 3:50 PM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 15:44 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Supposedly together with the GCC 11 mass-rebuild. GCC 11.1 was just released and there are only a few failing packages left in Staging:Gcc7.
That does indeed sound a like a realistic target.
In :Gcc7, we currently see only a handful of builds failing: https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7?defaults=0&failed=1&unresolvable=1&broken=1&locked=1&deleting=1&arch_i586=1&arch_x86_64=1&repo_standard=1
Everybody is invited to help fix the failures.
I'll take care of dpkg. It hasn't been updated in a while. Adrian
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 4/27/21 3:50 PM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 15:44 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Supposedly together with the GCC 11 mass-rebuild. GCC 11.1 was just released and there are only a few failing packages left in Staging:Gcc7.
That does indeed sound a like a realistic target.
In :Gcc7, we currently see only a handful of builds failing: https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7?defaults=0&failed=1&unresolvable=1&broken=1&locked=1&deleting=1&arch_i586=1&arch_x86_64=1&repo_standard=1
Everybody is invited to help fix the failures.
I'll take care of dpkg. It hasn't been updated in a while.
Thanks a lot. Note most (all?) failures should have corresponding bugreports linked from the GCC 11 meta-bug (boo#1181859). Richard. -- Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
On 4/28/21 8:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I'll take care of dpkg. It hasn't been updated in a while.
Thanks a lot. Note most (all?) failures should have corresponding bugreports linked from the GCC 11 meta-bug (boo#1181859).
I assume that the gcc-11 test-rebuilds in Debian will happen in the next weeks as well provided that we're getting the Bullseye release out, so there will be additional gcc-11 build fixes coming from that side, too. Since doko already uploaded the 11.1 release to experimental [1], we could in principle already start with the test-builds. Adrian
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-11&suite=experimental
On 4/28/21 8:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'll take care of dpkg. It hasn't been updated in a while.
Thanks a lot. Note most (all?) failures should have corresponding bugreports linked from the GCC 11 meta-bug (boo#1181859).
I have submitted an update yesterday [1]. Do you have an gcc-11 testing repository that I can use to test-build against gcc-11? Oh, and I can also add the boo-reference if you want. Adrian
On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 10:36 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 4/28/21 8:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'll take care of dpkg. It hasn't been updated in a while.
Thanks a lot. Note most (all?) failures should have corresponding bugreports linked from the GCC 11 meta-bug (boo#1181859).
I have submitted an update yesterday [1]. Do you have an gcc-11 testing repository that I can use to test-build against gcc-11?
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7 - don't let the prj name confuse you :) Cheers, Dominique
On 4/29/21 10:37 AM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
I have submitted an update yesterday [1]. Do you have an gcc-11 testing repository that I can use to test-build against gcc-11?
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7 - don't let the prj name confuse you :)
OK, I've added the repo path for the Tumbleweed project now:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:glaubitz:branches:system:packag...
I assume that should be enough to have gcc/gcc-c++ point to gcc-11. Adrian
Hi! On 4/29/21 10:41 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7 - don't let the prj name confuse you :)
OK, I've added the repo path for the Tumbleweed project now:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:glaubitz:branches:system:packag...
I assume that should be enough to have gcc/gcc-c++ point to gcc-11.
Builds fine with gcc-11 [1]. I guess we can accept the package although I guess Richi wants me to add the Bugzilla reference, no? Adrian
[1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:glaubitz:branches:sys...
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 12:25 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
On 4/29/21 10:41 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7 - don't let the prj name confuse you :)
OK, I've added the repo path for the Tumbleweed project now:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:glaubitz:branches:system:packag...
I assume that should be enough to have gcc/gcc-c++ point to gcc-11.
Builds fine with gcc-11 [1]. I guess we can accept the package although I guess Richi wants me to add the Bugzilla reference, no?
If the bugref exists and is known, it's nice to add it for documentation purpose. Cheers, Dominique
On 4/30/21 12:50 PM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
Builds fine with gcc-11 [1]. I guess we can accept the package although I guess Richi wants me to add the Bugzilla reference, no?
If the bugref exists and is known, it's nice to add it for documentation purpose.
Added. Could someone accept the request?
Adrian
On 5/3/21 12:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
If the bugref exists and is known, it's nice to add it for documentation purpose.
Added. Could someone accept the request?
Looks like the maintainer preferred just a cherry-picked patch instead of updating the whole package [1] which I find odd. I assume my submission was overlooked. Adrian
Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
All packages that contained compat symlinks or needed other adjustments for the UsrMerge are checked into Factory! The staging tests passed openQA. That means the switch to activate the UsrMerge could be flipped any time if wanted. When the UsrMerge gets activated, the TW engines will choke a bit until everything has settled again. So Dominique has to find the right timing I guess :-)
Supposedly together with the GCC 11 mass-rebuild. GCC 11.1 was just released and there are only a few failing packages left in Staging:Gcc7.
What's the ETA for that? If activating gcc1 is still weeks away then maybe decoupling the two things makes more sense? cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
On Mon, 10 May 2021, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
All packages that contained compat symlinks or needed other adjustments for the UsrMerge are checked into Factory! The staging tests passed openQA. That means the switch to activate the UsrMerge could be flipped any time if wanted. When the UsrMerge gets activated, the TW engines will choke a bit until everything has settled again. So Dominique has to find the right timing I guess :-)
Supposedly together with the GCC 11 mass-rebuild. GCC 11.1 was just released and there are only a few failing packages left in Staging:Gcc7.
What's the ETA for that? If activating gcc1 is still weeks away then maybe decoupling the two things makes more sense?
ETA was early this week but then - you know how it is with targeting a moving train with CI ... boo#1185831 - if the kernel were not updated we'd be there. Richard. -- Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
participants (4)
-
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar -
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz -
Ludwig Nussel -
Richard Biener