Merge of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin ???
Starting with TW 20241002 I noticed the following messages in the journal when the system is booted. System is tainted: unmerged-bin After doing some research I found dicussions in Fedora about a proposed plan to merge /usr/bin and /usr/sbin where /usr/sbin would symlink to /usr/bin similar to what we say a year or so ago with the /bin and /usr/bin merge. Here are the links from Fedora I am referrring to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/42/ChangeSet#Unify_/usr/bin_and_/usr... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapro... It appears that the systemd message is something being reported because /usr/sbin is not a symlink to /usr/bin. Is TW moving in this direction too or I have misundestood what I read and there is some other issue here ? -- Regards, Joe
On 11/4/24 8:50 PM, Joe Salmeri wrote:
Starting with TW 20241002 I noticed the following messages in the journal when the system is booted.
System is tainted: unmerged-bin
After doing some research I found dicussions in Fedora about a proposed plan to merge /usr/bin and /usr/sbin where /usr/sbin would symlink to /usr/bin similar to what we say a year or so ago with the /bin and /usr/bin merge.
Here are the links from Fedora I am referrring to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/42/ChangeSet#Unify_/usr/bin_and_/usr... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapro...
It appears that the systemd message is something being reported because /usr/sbin is not a symlink to /usr/bin.
Is TW moving in this direction too or I have misundestood what I read and there is some other issue here ?
participants (2)
-
Georg Pfuetzenreuter -
Joe Salmeri