[opensuse-factory] openSUSE Tumbleweed – Review of the Week 2016/33
(Sorry, I seem to have forgotten to publish this on Friday evening) Dear Tumbleweed users and hackers, Week 33 brought us again 5 snapshots (0812, 0813, 0815, 0816 and 0817). There were some smaller and bigger updates, as usual. The noteworthy updates were * Mozilla Firefox 48.0 * KDE Plasma 5.7.3 * Mozilla NSS 5.24 – Most SSLv2 code disappeared * Linux Kernel – some security fixes * PAM Config 0.91 – this time without the regression of ‘last time’ And a couple more things are being prepared in staging areads * Linux kernel 4.7.1 * KDE Applications 16.08.0 * glibc 2.24 – one more package needs to be fixed (openmpi) Most of those things are likely to reach you during next week. Cheers, Dominique
On lundi, 22 août 2016 10.38:26 h CEST Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
(Sorry, I seem to have forgotten to publish this on Friday evening)
Dear Tumbleweed users and hackers,
Week 33 brought us again 5 snapshots (0812, 0813, 0815, 0816 and 0817). There were some smaller and bigger updates, as usual.
The noteworthy updates were
* Mozilla Firefox 48.0 * KDE Plasma 5.7.3 * Mozilla NSS 5.24 – Most SSLv2 code disappeared * Linux Kernel – some security fixes * PAM Config 0.91 – this time without the regression of ‘last time’
And a couple more things are being prepared in staging areads
* Linux kernel 4.7.1 * KDE Applications 16.08.0 * glibc 2.24 – one more package needs to be fixed (openmpi)
Most of those things are likely to reach you during next week.
Cheers, Dominique Chromium 52 security fixes ? (perhaps one day :-)
-- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe fellowship GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 11:31 +0200, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Chromium 52 security fixes ? (perhaps one day :-)
With pleasure - if somebody submits a package that actually reliably builds.
osc jobhist openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:51 chromium standard x86_64 time package reason code build time worker 2016-07-24 06:52:12 chromium new build failed 1h 55m 32s cloud131:1 2016-07-25 17:11:03 chromium meta change failed 2h 53m 51s cloud131:1 2016-07-26 23:25:13 chromium meta change failed 2h 24m 20s cloud131:1 2016-07-29 03:35:08 chromium new build failed 2m 14s build79:1 2016-07-29 18:31:40 chromium retrying bad bu failed 4h 37m 4s build80:3 2016-08-03 22:51:17 chromium meta change failed 0m 7s build74:1 2016-08-05 11:56:02 chromium retrying bad bu failed 2h 12m 9s cloud133:1 2016-08-07 15:08:07 chromium source change failed 2h 49m 51s cloud134:2 2016-08-10 05:24:34 chromium meta change failed 2h 44m 59s cloud131:1 2016-08-13 00:28:32 chromium new build failed 1m 58s build79:3 2016-08-13 08:51:34 chromium retrying bad bu failed 3h 44m 19s build85:2 2016-08-17 11:19:12 chromium meta change failed 2m 2s cloud136:2 2016-08-18 23:06:27 chromium retrying bad bu failed 3h 19m 20s build75:4
ma., 22.08.2016 kl. 11.31 +0200, skrev Bruno Friedmann:
Chromium 52 security fixes ? (perhaps one day :-)
--
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:51 Lend a hand to fix the buildfail in staging if you want it. //Bjørn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi Guys, Working on it by changing the buildsystem for Chromium to the new GN and to reduce the number of builds that Ninja is firing. I am expecting that I would submit an update that hopefully fixes the build-issue. What I have been seeing however is that on 32-bit, Chromium itself is building fine, but then the package itself fails due to memory issues for rpmlint (Python). Fortunately this seems to be just for oS 13.2, but I would appreciate any suggestions on how to fix that. Regards Raymond On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Bjørn Lie <zaitor@opensuse.org> wrote:
ma., 22.08.2016 kl. 11.31 +0200, skrev Bruno Friedmann:
Chromium 52 security fixes ? (perhaps one day :-)
--
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:51
Lend a hand to fix the buildfail in staging if you want it.
//Bjørn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am Montag, 22. August 2016, 12:07:22 schrieb Raymond Wooninck:
What I have been seeing however is that on 32-bit, Chromium itself is building fine, but then the package itself fails due to memory issues for rpmlint (Python). Fortunately this seems to be just for oS 13.2, but I would appreciate any suggestions on how to fix that.
This is likely https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=969732, fixed in Factory by this submit: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/406275 libqt5-qtwebengine in KDE:Qt5 (still) fails to build as well on 13.2/32bit with an rpmlint MemoryError. Maybe we should release an rpmlint update with this fix for 13.2 too... Kind Regards, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (5)
-
Bjørn Lie -
Bruno Friedmann -
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar -
Raymond Wooninck -
Wolfgang Bauer