On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 6:17 PM L A Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> wrote:

So I should file this as a bug against factory or tumbleweed? There was some disagreement about whether or not they should be treated the same?

This is a bug against Factory, but for reference: Factory and Tumbleweed are one and the same.

Because these utils 'should' be statically linkable and *are* on redhat (which I thought opensuse was based on). So how did static linking get broken for us but still work for redhat?

While it is true that SuSE Linux was very similar to Red Hat Linux (and openSUSE today is somewhat similar to Fedora), there is technically no common ancestry. SuSE Linux (which is the common ancestor of openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise) is technically a derivative of Slackware. Over the course of the 90s, SuSE adopted many characteristics from Red Hat Linux (including the RPM package manager, then known as the Red Hat Package Manager), which led to the relatively compatible platform setup. There is some collaboration today between Fedora and openSUSE as we're both friends, but there are definitely differences in the platforms. Unfortunately, I'm not sure what causes your specific problem, though I can say that the openSUSE packaging for this is much more complex than the Fedora one. That makes it harder for me to pin down what's going wrong. It's probably something to do with the different compile flags. There may be a subtle incompatibility in the default openSUSE flags breaking static compilation. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Am 07.10.18 um 00:17 schrieb L A Walsh:

So I should file this as a bug against factory or tumbleweed?  There was some disagreement about whether or not they should be treated the same?

Tumbleweed == Factory.

Because these utils 'should' be statically linkable and *are* on redhat> (which I thought opensuse was based on).

Where do you get your alternative facts from?

So how did static linking get broken for us but still work for redhat?

It did not get broken. seife@strolchi:/dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1> ./configure --enable-static-programs=mount,umount checking for gcc... gcc [...] checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes [...] checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes [...] configure: enable static build: mount. configure: enable static build: umount. [...] Type 'make' or 'make <utilname>' to compile. seife@strolchi:/dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1> make -j8 mount.static \ umount.static CC lib/libuuid_la-randutils.lo CC lib/libuuid_la-md5.lo CC lib/libuuid_la-sha1.lo CC sys-utils/umount_static-umount.o CC sys-utils/mount_static-mount.o [...] CCLD libblkid.la copying selected object files to avoid basename conflicts... CCLD libmount.la CCLD mount.static CCLD umount.static /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ./.libs/libmount.a(libmount_la-utils.o): in function `mnt_get_gid': /dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1/libmount/src/utils.c:614: warning: Using 'getgrnam_r' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ./.libs/libmount.a(libmount_la-utils.o): in function `mnt_get_uid': /dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1/libmount/src/utils.c:587: warning: Using 'getpwnam_r' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ./.libs/libmount.a(libmount_la-utils.o): in function `mnt_get_username': /dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1/libmount/src/utils.c:566: warning: Using 'getpwuid_r' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ./.libs/libmount.a(libmount_la-utils.o): in function `mnt_get_gid': /dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1/libmount/src/utils.c:614: warning: Using 'getgrnam_r' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ./.libs/libmount.a(libmount_la-utils.o): in function `mnt_get_uid': /dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1/libmount/src/utils.c:587: warning: Using 'getpwnam_r' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ./.libs/libmount.a(libmount_la-utils.o): in function `mnt_get_username': /dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1/libmount/src/utils.c:566: warning: Using 'getpwuid_r' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking seife@strolchi:/dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1> file mount.static mount.static: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), statically linked, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, BuildID[sha1]=13f8198ac488c2c3f689c37a141adfbc63ec3af4, with debug_info, not stripped seife@strolchi:/dev/shm/util-linux-2.33-rc1> ldd mount.static not a dynamic executable The bug is thus "RESOLVED WORKSFORME"

so I see...  Except I got:

 CC       sys-utils/mount_static-mount.o  CCLD     mount.static libtool: warning: complete static linking is impossible in this configuration /usr/bin/ld: total time in link: 0.038189  CC       sys-utils/umount_static-umount.o  CCLD     umount.static libtool: warning: complete static linking is impossible in this configuration /usr/bin/ld: total time in link: 0.039017

ld is not giving this output for me, do you use some strange options that might interfere?

with ldd: Ishtar:tools/util-linux/util-linux-2.33-rc1> ldd mount.static  linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc38d78000)  librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003001c00000)  libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003000800000)  libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003000c00000)  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f81b9262000)

So why would it work on redhat but not opensuse?  Any ideas?

You are doing it wrong. -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org