[opensuse-factory] New sssd desires samba4
This is something to think on for openSUSE 13.2. The 1.10.x series of sssd wants to have the Samba4 header files so it can build its AD integration plugins. (S4/AD cannot be turned off, and that is an sssd bug, but that is not the point -- we surely want to build that plugin anyway.) openSUSE still does not have Samba4 in its package selection, and I am wondering when that might be expected to show up in future Factory. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:49:54PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
This is something to think on for openSUSE 13.2.
The 1.10.x series of sssd wants to have the Samba4 header files so it can build its AD integration plugins. (S4/AD cannot be turned off, and that is an sssd bug, but that is not the point -- we surely want to build that plugin anyway.)
openSUSE still does not have Samba4 in its package selection, and I am wondering when that might be expected to show up in future Factory.
4.0.9 is part of Factory since last week IIRC. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On Monday 2013-09-02 21:45, Lars Müller wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:49:54PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The 1.10.x series of sssd wants to have the Samba4 header files
4.0.9 is part of Factory since last week IIRC.
That samba.spec however is not clean enough to satisfy me, or the sssd build process. So here is created request id 197542 Now, don't take too long accepting this one. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi Jan, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:00:20PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2013-09-02 21:45, Lars Müller wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:49:54PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The 1.10.x series of sssd wants to have the Samba4 header files
4.0.9 is part of Factory since last week IIRC.
That samba.spec however is not clean enough to satisfy me, or the sssd build process. So here is
created request id 197542
Now, don't take too long accepting this one.
Thanks for the submit request. I've made my comment via https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/197542 a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too. b) samba-pkgdeps.diff I like you to push to bugzilla.samba.org as explained in the decline message. c) %defattr(-,root,root,-) vs %defattr(-,root,root)? Is that intentional? Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On Friday 2013-09-06 16:03, Lars Müller wrote:
a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too.
Someone might expect that samba-devel installs *all* development objects of samba. Since that no longer is the case (they are now in libxxxxxxxx-devel), a rename seemed useful.
b) samba-pkgdeps.diff I like you to push to bugzilla.samba.org as explained in the decline message.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10129
c) %defattr(-,root,root,-) vs %defattr(-,root,root)? Is that intentional?
"-,root,root,-" is a redundant way to write "-,root,root", because the fourth field defaults to "-" (take from file/don't override) anyway. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi Stephan, is it possible to get a package change like the one Jan suggested with https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/197542 into openSUSE 13.1? This is a highly welcome cleanup and might make even Steffen Winterfeldt's life from the install system point of view (resulting size due to the library dependencies) a bit easier. He recenly had some trouble with the size of libsmbclient starting with Samba 4.0. @Jan: Thanks a lot for this very well done work! On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 06:27:52PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Friday 2013-09-06 16:03, Lars Müller wrote:
a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too.
Someone might expect that samba-devel installs *all* development objects of samba. Since that no longer is the case (they are now in libxxxxxxxx-devel), a rename seemed useful.
b) samba-pkgdeps.diff I like you to push to bugzilla.samba.org as explained in the decline message.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10129
c) %defattr(-,root,root,-) vs %defattr(-,root,root)? Is that intentional?
"-,root,root,-" is a redundant way to write "-,root,root", because the fourth field defaults to "-" (take from file/don't override) anyway.
Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13.09.2013 13:03, Lars Müller wrote:
Hi Stephan,
is it possible to get a package change like the one Jan suggested with https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/197542 into openSUSE 13.1?
This is a highly welcome cleanup and might make even Steffen Winterfeldt's life from the install system point of view (resulting size due to the library dependencies) a bit easier. He recenly had some trouble with the size of libsmbclient starting with Samba 4.0.
@Jan: Thanks a lot for this very well done work!
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 06:27:52PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Friday 2013-09-06 16:03, Lars Müller wrote:
a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too.
Someone might expect that samba-devel installs *all* development objects of samba. Since that no longer is the case (they are now in libxxxxxxxx-devel), a rename seemed useful.
There is still a samba-devel? Otherwise this will create a neat bomb of useless work ;( Greetings, Stephan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFSNuQCwFSBhlBjoJYRArq2AJ9MDSMp5jfZeQSEZPT/yZNvVLpdhwCbB4TR ioJ277Fl0KuTAEadPB/pZTc= =Rexs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Monday 2013-09-16 12:57, Stephan Kulow wrote:
a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too.
Someone might expect that samba-devel installs *all* development objects of samba. Since that no longer is the case (they are now in libxxxxxxxx-devel), a rename seemed useful.
There is still a samba-devel? Otherwise this will create a neat bomb of useless work ;(
Well, with my SR, samba-devel is gone. There is however still a set of totally random .h files used by everything, and they have been put into samba-core-devel. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 16.09.2013 13:54, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2013-09-16 12:57, Stephan Kulow wrote:
a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too.
Someone might expect that samba-devel installs *all* development objects of samba. Since that no longer is the case (they are now in libxxxxxxxx-devel), a rename seemed useful.
There is still a samba-devel? Otherwise this will create a neat bomb of useless work ;(
Well, with my SR, samba-devel is gone. There is however still a set of totally random .h files used by everything, and they have been put into samba-core-devel.
Still you break every package relying on samba and as such it's a nogo? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Monday 2013-09-16 17:20, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 16.09.2013 13:54, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2013-09-16 12:57, Stephan Kulow wrote:
a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too.
Someone might expect that samba-devel installs *all* development objects of samba. Since that no longer is the case (they are now in libxxxxxxxx-devel), a rename seemed useful.
There is still a samba-devel? Otherwise this will create a neat bomb of useless work ;(
Well, with my SR, samba-devel is gone. There is however still a set of totally random .h files used by everything, and they have been put into samba-core-devel.
Still you break every package relying on samba and as such it's a nogo?
Nothing depended on samba-devel in the first place, because that was just introduced two weeks ago. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 16.09.2013 17:45, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2013-09-16 17:20, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 16.09.2013 13:54, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2013-09-16 12:57, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > a) I don't understand why you rename the subpackage samba-devel > to samba-core-devel. Fedora uses samba-devel too.
Someone might expect that samba-devel installs *all* development objects of samba. Since that no longer is the case (they are now in libxxxxxxxx-devel), a rename seemed useful.
There is still a samba-devel? Otherwise this will create a neat bomb of useless work ;(
Well, with my SR, samba-devel is gone. There is however still a set of totally random .h files used by everything, and they have been put into samba-core-devel.
Still you break every package relying on samba and as such it's a nogo?
Nothing depended on samba-devel in the first place, because that was just introduced two weeks ago.
Ah right, the old package is libsmbclient-devel - then we should be fine. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thursday 2013-09-05 22:00, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2013-09-02 21:45, Lars Müller wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:49:54PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The 1.10.x series of sssd wants to have the Samba4 header files
4.0.9 is part of Factory since last week IIRC.
That samba.spec however is not clean enough to satisfy me, or the sssd build process. So here is
created request id 197542
Now, don't take too long accepting this one.
While you did go fast on 197542, 199060 now seems to be languishing a bit. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi Jan, On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:26:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: [ 8< ]
While you did go fast on 197542, 199060 now seems to be languishing a bit.
I'm no longer on vacation. ;) Thanks! 'Add or polish the shared library package summaries and descriptions.' is the resulting package change log message. As soon as network:samba:STABLE built for openSUSE 13.1 and Factory I'll file the submit request. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
participants (3)
-
Jan Engelhardt -
Lars Müller -
Stephan Kulow