On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Dominique Leuenberger <Dominique.Leuenberger@tmf-group.com> wrote:

On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 17:09 +0300, Alexey Eremenko wrote:

...

It seems that some people here don't like the idea of "uneven number of Reviewers".

I would like to hear ideas of improvement. How to make this project a success ?

Alexey,

I don't think that voting is the way to got for such a repository.

We should consider the reviewers more as a 'board of advisors'. When a new package is proposed and 'accepted' by one of the reviewers, it should go in, except if any random other one has a veto. As long as there is a veto, the package should not go in (well: as long as the veto is backed with argumentation of course.... arguments other than 'i do not use this package' of course).

Comments?

Well, yes, this technique can work. Actually the review procedure is supposed to work the way you described - the uneven number of reviewers is to solve issues of "last resort". -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org