New builds not being published ???
It seems like there is a problem with new builds being published. TW build 20230907 is over 1 day old and it was never published, and 20230908 is 15 hours old and it has not been published. Looking at the stats for those builds it does not appear like there were any major issues that I can see. -- Regards, Joe
There was one published after this
Den lör 9 sep. 2023 kl 18:39 skrev Joe Salmeri
It seems like there is a problem with new builds being published.
TW build 20230907 is over 1 day old and it was never published, and 20230908 is 15 hours old and it has not been published.
Looking at the stats for those builds it does not appear like there were any major issues that I can see.
--
Regards,
Joe
20230907 didn't pass. You can take a look at https://openqa.opensuse.org to see if the builds pass openQA and will be published.
On 9/12/23 10:26, Douglas DeMaio wrote:
20230907 didn't pass. You can take a look at https://openqa.opensuse.org to see if the builds pass openQA and will be published.
Thanks, I do watch the openqa website. 20230906 had 255 passed, 34 soft failed, and 23 failed and was published 20230907 had 255 passed, 36 soft failed, and 22 failed and was NOT published. I looked at the failures for 20230907 and didn't see anything that seemed like it would hold up the publishing. 20230908 had 255 passed, 36 soft failed, and 22 failed. After a bunch of time elapsed ( such that it would normally have shown to be published ), I sent my message because it appeared like something might be wrong as the delay from completion to published was longer than normal and the previous build which also appeared to not have any major problems also was not published. Other than the "published" indicator on openqa is there something else you look at to see whether a build "will" be published because that and the statistics for the build that I mentioned above are all that I see. -- Regards, Joe
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 10:41 -0400, Joe Salmeri wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:26, Douglas DeMaio wrote:
20230907 didn't pass. You can take a look at https://openqa.opensuse.org to see if the builds pass openQA and will be published.
Thanks, I do watch the openqa website.
20230906 had 255 passed, 34 soft failed, and 23 failed and was published 20230907 had 255 passed, 36 soft failed, and 22 failed and was NOT published.
I looked at the failures for 20230907 and didn't see anything that seemed like it would hold up the publishing.
20230908 had 255 passed, 36 soft failed, and 22 failed.
too busy to look into it fully but I'd bet good money that 20230908 went to openQA for testing before 20230907 finished testing As soon as 20230908 hit for testing, it would have prevented 0907 from being shipped -- Richard Brown Distributions Architect SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, D-90461 Nuremberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Managing Directors/Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich
On 9/12/23 10:52, Richard Brown wrote:
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 10:41 -0400, Joe Salmeri wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:26, Douglas DeMaio wrote:
20230907 didn't pass. You can take a look at https://openqa.opensuse.org to see if the builds pass openQA and will be published. Thanks, I do watch the openqa website.
20230906 had 255 passed, 34 soft failed, and 23 failed and was published 20230907 had 255 passed, 36 soft failed, and 22 failed and was NOT published.
I looked at the failures for 20230907 and didn't see anything that seemed like it would hold up the publishing.
20230908 had 255 passed, 36 soft failed, and 22 failed.
too busy to look into it fully but I'd bet good money that 20230908 went to openQA for testing before 20230907 finished testing
As soon as 20230908 hit for testing, it would have prevented 0907 from being shipped
Thanks Richard, I guess that could be the case but I thought there was close to a day between when 20230907 finished and when 20230908 started but I'm sure you can see things taht I cannot see on the openqa site. Bottom line is that 20230908 did finally publish and now we have 0910 and 0911 published so if there was an issue it seems to be resolved now. -- Regards, Joe
participants (4)
-
Douglas DeMaio -
Joe Salmeri -
Luna Jernberg -
Richard Brown