Re: [opensuse-factory] Stability of Tumbleweed

On 5 August 2015 at 13:36, gargamel 704 <gargamel704@hotmail.de> wrote:
The only UEFI issue I've found is only related to USB sticks I'm talking to you from a Tumbleweed machine running UEFI (no Legacy) 2 out of 3 of my regular machines are UEFI only, and haven't had any problems on any recent snapshots So, what are the symptoms I should be experiencing?
I know I've said this before but I'll say it again If you are using additional repos, you are NOT using Tumbleweed You're using Tumbleweed with additional Repos, and the responsibility for any issues caused by those additional repos can not, and should not, be put on the shoulders of Tumbleweed This is especially dangerous when you realise most additional repos are Devel repos, which, by design and definition, should contain BROKEN things before being submitted to Tumbleweed. They're untested, they're not guaranteed to work, don't blame Tumbleweed when an additional repo has a dependency problem. Wherever possible, stick to using just Tumbleweed If you need more packages in Tumbleweed that exist in some repo somewhere, encourage the maintainer to submit them to Tumbleweed and maintain them properly.
Suggestion: What about automating dependency issue reporting in zypper and yast? I think we would see then probably a lot more of these reports.
No, because it sounds like at least one of your dependency problem is at least partially your own fault by using non-standard repos.
I'm sorry, but I don't buy that argument. Not everything is fixed by tooling, sometimes some people just have to do stuff Besides, the official link for reporting bugs on Tumbleweed makes the whole process pretty darn simple: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=openSUSE+Factory&format=g... from https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Submitting_bug_reports -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:41:56 +0200, Richard Brown wrote:
There is a known problem of 32bit UEFI firmware that is often seen on Baytrail tablets or such. Yes, the progress on it is very slow, maybe partly because the problem is only on specific hardware the relevant developers have no access to. But I also don't know of general problem wrt UEFI support on TW, too. Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Il Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:03:02 +0200, Takashi Iwai ha scritto:
But I also don't know of general problem wrt UEFI support on TW, too.
Yesterday I tried reinstalling my laptop and the ISO images would not boot from UEFI (but they booted fine from BIOS legacy mode). I have an older (~1 year) TW ISO around that boots from USB fine. I'm guessing it's the same issue? -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: A29D259B -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Luca Beltrame <lbeltrame@kde.org> wrote:
Quite possible. ISO images look definitely wrong for EFI boot. OTOH I could not reproduce this using OVMF in QEMU so some implementations seem to be more tolerant than others. This unfortunately also means that this cannot be caught in openQA as it is likely using the same OVMF :( -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:41:56 +0200, Richard Brown wrote:
There is a known problem of 32bit UEFI firmware that is often seen on Baytrail tablets or such. Yes, the progress on it is very slow, maybe partly because the problem is only on specific hardware the relevant developers have no access to. But I also don't know of general problem wrt UEFI support on TW, too. Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Il Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:03:02 +0200, Takashi Iwai ha scritto:
But I also don't know of general problem wrt UEFI support on TW, too.
Yesterday I tried reinstalling my laptop and the ISO images would not boot from UEFI (but they booted fine from BIOS legacy mode). I have an older (~1 year) TW ISO around that boots from USB fine. I'm guessing it's the same issue? -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: A29D259B -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Luca Beltrame <lbeltrame@kde.org> wrote:
Quite possible. ISO images look definitely wrong for EFI boot. OTOH I could not reproduce this using OVMF in QEMU so some implementations seem to be more tolerant than others. This unfortunately also means that this cannot be caught in openQA as it is likely using the same OVMF :( -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Andrei Borzenkov
-
Luca Beltrame
-
Richard Brown
-
Takashi Iwai