[opensuse-factory] Status: Build50 is RC1
Hi, Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good. E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :) Greetings, Stephan -- Humor in the Court: Q: What is your relationship with the plaintiff? A: She is my daughter. Q: Was she your daughter on February 13, 1979? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 14:46:44 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
I've updated the wiki with the above bug: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Most_annoying_bugs_12.2_dev#openSUSE_12.2_RC... Thanks Coolo! Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 07/11/2012 09:24 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 14:46:44 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
I've updated the wiki with the above bug: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Most_annoying_bugs_12.2_dev#openSUSE_12.2_RC...
Is there a reason that a general user (me) is denied access to Bug 768584? Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 09:32:42 Larry Finger wrote:
On 07/11/2012 09:24 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 14:46:44 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
I've updated the wiki with the above bug: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Most_annoying_bugs_12.2_dev#openSUSE _12.2_RC_1 Is there a reason that a general user (me) is denied access to Bug 768584?
Looking at the bug itself, I see no access restrictions - and I can see it without being logged in. So, either a heisenbug or somebody fixed it in the meantime ;) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 07/11/2012 09:40 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Looking at the bug itself, I see no access restrictions - and I can see it without being logged in. So, either a heisenbug or somebody fixed it in the meantime ;)
It works here now. Heisenbug it seems. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi just install RC1(Build50) with net-install -plymouth not work (no theme on grub2) -version number is 12.2 Beta2........ -kde kick off icon in KDE is not the good one Bye -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 17:10:09 johann Luce wrote:
Hi
just install RC1(Build50) with net-install
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2?
-plymouth not work (no theme on grub2)
Could you file a bug report for this, please?
-version number is 12.2 Beta2........ -kde kick off icon in KDE is not the good one
Could you file a bug report for this as well, please? thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le 11/07/2012 17:14, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 17:10:09 johann Luce wrote:
Hi
just install RC1(Build50) with net-install Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2? teh default is 12.2 and zypper lr -u said the same thing -plymouth not work (no theme on grub2) Could you file a bug report for this, please? ok -version number is 12.2 Beta2........ -kde kick off icon in KDE is not the good one ok Could you file a bug report for this as well, please?
thanks, Andreas
bye -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 17:18:39 johann Luce wrote:
Le 11/07/2012 17:14, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 17:10:09 johann Luce wrote:
Hi
just install RC1(Build50) with net-install
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2?
teh default is 12.2 and zypper lr -u said the same thing
What is the exact URL of your repository? Andreas
-plymouth not work (no theme on grub2)
Could you file a bug report for this, please?
ok
-version number is 12.2 Beta2........ -kde kick off icon in KDE is not the good one
ok
Could you file a bug report for this as well, please?
thanks, Andreas
bye
-- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 11/07/12 17:14, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 17:10:09 johann Luce wrote:
Hi
just install RC1(Build50) with net-install
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2?
-plymouth not work (no theme on grub2)
Hi I have beta2 which I updated with Yast online Update. It did a plymouth and a kernel update. After the grub 1.99 secection screen, I get a Lizard on a green background with fuzzy blobs moving around and a status indicator filling up left to right beneath the lizard. Is this the theme or splash you are referring to? L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2012/07/11 17:14 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2?
I've asked several times in recent weeks, where this apparently secret location of 12.2 is, with never a URL in response, usually with no response at all, including yesterday: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2012-07/msg00130.html I use a web browser to look on whatever mirror is provided via download.opensuse.org, and there is no distribution/12.2. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 07/11/2012 12:34 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/07/11 17:14 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2?
I've asked several times in recent weeks, where this apparently secret location of 12.2 is, with never a URL in response, usually with no response at all,
Hmmm, try this: http://software.opensuse.org/developer/en HTH, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjschwei@suse.com rschweik@ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2012/07/11 14:27 (GMT-0400) Robert Schweikert composed:
On 07/11/2012 12:34 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/07/11 17:14 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2?
I've asked several times in recent weeks, where this apparently secret location of 12.2 is, with never a URL in response, usually with no response at all,
Hmmm, try this: http://software.opensuse.org/developer/en
Too broken to figure out how it's supposed to work. Nothing I do there tells me an URL I'll be downloading from - if I could ever find someplace to click that actually triggers a download, not that I would click it to start a download, because I only download with downloaders (e.g. curl or wget), not with any web browser. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 11.07.2012 18:34, schrieb Felix Miata:
On 2012/07/11 17:14 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2?
I've asked several times in recent weeks, where this apparently secret location of 12.2 is, with never a URL in response, usually with no response at all, including yesterday: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2012-07/msg00130.html
I use a web browser to look on whatever mirror is provided via download.opensuse.org, and there is no distribution/12.2.
Yes, because RC1 is not released. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2012/07/11 20:55 (GMT+0200) Stephan Kulow composed:
Felix Miata composed, in English:
On 2012/07/11 17:14 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Which URL did you use for network installation? Did you use Factory or 12.2? [1]
I've asked several times in recent weeks, where this apparently secret location of 12.2 is, with never a URL in response, usually with no response at all, including yesterday: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2012-07/msg00130.html
I use a web browser to look on whatever mirror is provided via download.opensuse.org, and there is no distribution/12.2.
Yes, because RC1 is not released.
Still no straight answer to what I actually asked. I didn't ask about RC1. Writers here keep referring to 12.2 as if it existed somewhere on public mirrors as something distinct from Factory, as in branched *somewhere*. I know very well 12.2 hasn't been released, so assume the 12.2 meaning used is latest packages pushed, regardless what the installed system may report as. How could johann Luce report having updated so as to cause someone as key to the project as Andreas Jaeger to ask whether johann used Factory or 12.2 [1] if there is no distinction between 12.2 and Factory available publicly? [1] http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2012-07/msg00142.html -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 11.07.2012 21:47, schrieb Felix Miata:
Still no straight answer to what I actually asked. I didn't ask about RC1. Writers here keep referring to 12.2 as if it existed somewhere on public mirrors as something distinct from Factory, as in branched *somewhere*. I know very well 12.2 hasn't been released, so assume the 12.2 meaning used is latest packages pushed, regardless what the installed system may report as.
12.2 is branched and built on its own in openSUSE:12.2 and its repositories are not on mirrors unless I publish RC1. Understood? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 07/11/2012 09:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote: As usual there are things that are obvious to some but not to others. The openSUSE build service has two different product lines building right now of interest to the discussion: The usual factory and also the 12.2 distribution. There're two ways to submit packages to factory - as Coolo explained already on this list to the packager: You can either do a maintenance update or you submit to factory and Coolo selects which package to check in as well to 12.2. Thus, factory contains many more package updates than openSUSE 12.2 does - check the opensuse-commit mailing list. Johann said he updated to 12.2 RC1 - and that's what I challenged. I doubt that he updated (besides using the netinstall ISO), I expect he installed the current version of factory which might explain some of the bugs he mentioned. There's unfortunately only limited bandwith and Coolo is not pushing out 12.2 and factory at the same time right now. Coolo is pushing out a 12.2 tree that will show up as distribution/12.2 once RC1 is out and reflect RC1. Also, we release updates as maintenance updates already since Beta2 for 12.2. But there's no daily sync out of 12.2 to our mirror network. Btw. this is the same setup Coolo did in the past, so nothing new happening here... Coolo, did I miss anything? Felix, I hope this solves your confusion, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2012/07/11 22:00 (GMT+0200) Andreas Jaeger composed:
Felix, I hope this solves your confusion,
It's immensely more helpful than Coolo's response. Still I'm in a cloud as to how to determine when and whether to try to follow-up on bugs filed against B2 and prior once the mention of branching a release makes its initial appearance, at least until an RC actually hits the mirrors as an RC. And, the puzzle will likely return some time after RC1 release while an RC2 is soon expected. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
(2012/07/11 21:46), Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
Greetings, Stephan
Could you copy the latest fontconfig and fonts-config into the 12.2 project? They were accepted 2 weeks ago. These packages fix bnc#766319. -- Fuminobu TAKEYAMA -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 11.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Fuminobu TAKEYAMA:
(2012/07/11 21:46), Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
Greetings, Stephan
Could you copy the latest fontconfig and fonts-config into the 12.2 project? They were accepted 2 weeks ago.
These packages fix bnc#766319.
I find the changes too invasive to be included after the betas. Sorry. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
(12/07/12 3:56), Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 11.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Fuminobu TAKEYAMA:
(2012/07/11 21:46), Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
Greetings, Stephan
Could you copy the latest fontconfig and fonts-config into the 12.2 project? They were accepted 2 weeks ago.
These packages fix bnc#766319.
I find the changes too invasive to be included after the betas. Sorry.
Greetings, Stephan
You mean it's too late to report? I noticed inconsistent state of this fix in b2; only subset of packages to fix this bug are shipped with b2 but I could not understand when remaining packages will be or why not. Is there any chance to fix this problem by a less invasive and temporal approach? # it was mentioned in bnc#766319 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319 Is it acceptable to submit this fixed package directly to 12.2? -- Fuminobu TAKEYAMA -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:36:05PM +0900, Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote:
Is there any chance to fix this problem by a less invasive and temporal approach? # it was mentioned in bnc#766319 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319
Namely https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319#c1
Is it acceptable to submit this fixed package directly to 12.2?
IMHO it should be possible, because the change proposed there relates only to two font packages. Petr
Am 12.07.2012 09:02, schrieb pgajdos@suse.cz:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:36:05PM +0900, Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote:
Is there any chance to fix this problem by a less invasive and temporal approach? # it was mentioned in bnc#766319 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319
Namely https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319#c1
Is it acceptable to submit this fixed package directly to 12.2?
IMHO it should be possible, because the change proposed there relates only to two font packages.
*the* two font packages that all other other fonts using packages depend upon, right? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Am 12.07.2012 20:32, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Am 12.07.2012 09:02, schrieb pgajdos@suse.cz:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:36:05PM +0900, Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote:
Is there any chance to fix this problem by a less invasive and temporal approach? # it was mentioned in bnc#766319 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319
Namely https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319#c1
Is it acceptable to submit this fixed package directly to 12.2?
IMHO it should be possible, because the change proposed there relates only to two font packages.
*the* two font packages that all other other fonts using packages depend upon, right?
I suggest you do a maintenance update for RC1 and we'll see how it goes. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
(12/07/13 3:54), Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 12.07.2012 20:32, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Am 12.07.2012 09:02, schrieb pgajdos@suse.cz:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:36:05PM +0900, Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote:
Is there any chance to fix this problem by a less invasive and temporal approach? # it was mentioned in bnc#766319 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319
Namely https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319#c1
Is it acceptable to submit this fixed package directly to 12.2?
IMHO it should be possible, because the change proposed there relates only to two font packages.
*the* two font packages that all other other fonts using packages depend upon, right?
I suggest you do a maintenance update for RC1 and we'll see how it goes.
Greetings, Stephan
I found another temporary solution: Let's put IPA fonts into the black list for disabling BCI hinter as we did for the latest fontconfig, without changing other part of fontconfig. This will be easier and safer. This bug is potential and might cause maintenance problem in the future. We have migu-1m-fonts which provides 21-migu-1m-hinting.conf in M17N:fonts (not in Factory/12.2). I'll rename it to 51-migu-1m-hinting.conf although this file name is against the rule of fontconfig. -- Fuminobu TAKEYAMA -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:54:28PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Namely https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766319#c1
Is it acceptable to submit this fixed package directly to 12.2?
IMHO it should be possible, because the change proposed there relates only to two font packages.
*the* two font packages that all other other fonts using packages depend upon, right?
The change Takashi proposed in reffered link relates to ipa-fonts and ipa-ex-fonts. Petr
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 14:46:44 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
Can we get the fix out via an online update, please? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:34:10AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 14:46:44 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
Can we get the fix out via an online update, please?
This and other fixes that might pop up, yes. I will be doing it for this package to be quick, otherwise everyone feel free to do maintenancerequests against 12.2 too. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Le 12/07/2012 09:34, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 14:46:44 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :) Can we get the fix out via an online update, please?
Andreas hi
sorry for my english, i'm french so i don't very know if i am clear i install build50 via iso find here: http://openqa.opensuse.org/opensuse/www/htdocs/opensuse/factory-testing/iso/ and i take the net install so the repos are : http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/3456/dpot122rc14.png sorry if i do a mistake when i say i'ts RC1 but it is the build50 bye -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 09:54:04 johann Luce wrote:
Le 12/07/2012 09:34, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 14:46:44 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
E.g. bug 768584 is one for the most annoying RC1 bugs, but we had to cut it somewhere. I'm preparing and uploading in the course of this afternoon and we should press it out tomorrow :)
Can we get the fix out via an online update, please?
Andreas
hi
sorry for my english, i'm french so i don't very know if i am clear
i install build50 via iso find here:
http://openqa.opensuse.org/opensuse/www/htdocs/opensuse/factory-testin g/iso/
and i take the net install
so the repos are :
OK, that's the 12.2 repo - and it got updated to RC1 now - only Coolo can tell when...
sorry if i do a mistake when i say i'ts RC1 but it is the build50
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, 2012-07-11 at 14:46 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
I'm looking at <http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/>, but I see no metalink there. Is the method not to be used now? - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk//Ib0ACgkQtTMYHG2NR9XWfwCfQnokzinkvYKQ34gT4+NmfAde uokAn219SECg55HXrECyda/dY4nRQRxz =Duh4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-12 21:13, Carlos E. R. wrote:
I'm looking at <http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/>, but I see no metalink there. Is the method not to be used now?
Even though there is no .meta4 file, the method works: ~> aria2c --max-download-limit=100K --summary-interval=300 http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/openSUSE-DVD-Build005... Strange. Do not understand. - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk//I9EACgkQIvFNjefEBxpiegCeOs6Gn0v42siQathVKbh8SVDk bEMAnR8+65sQDd+NKjK4rxuVcoqQ6paf =rVag -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.07.2012 21:13, schrieb Carlos E. R.:
On Wednesday, 2012-07-11 at 14:46 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
I'm looking at <http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/>, but I see no metalink there. Is the method not to be used now?
metalinks never appeared in directory listings, but are autogenerated by mirrorbrain. Just go to software.opensuse.org/developer and pick it. Greetings, Stephan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk//I+0ACgkQwFSBhlBjoJa2wQCgyAMHwFKcehnsN8+K13BFPtz9 MjIAn31qr5lNNege5MnvTgvNllHRmS0r =o8Gq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-12 21:22, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 12.07.2012 21:13, schrieb Carlos E. R.:
metalinks never appeared in directory listings, but are autogenerated by mirrorbrain. Just go to software.opensuse.org/developer and pick it.
Strange, as I do remember seeing them previously. But it works anyway, so you must be right... - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk//JLAACgkQIvFNjefEBxpmTgCfUH257bPopnbLicksCThZle5A 4RAAoMewpsY5cuaJkNrH0xY3CmKGYuok =Bq9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Wednesday, 2012-07-11 at 14:46 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Everyone testing it, says it's good. It still has some bugs to fix, but that's why it's RC1 and not final - all in all it looks pretty good.
I'm looking at <http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/>, but I see no metalink there. Is the method not to be used now?
The link actually represents both, but if you don't specify that you want the metalink, you get the ISO. To get the metalink file : wget --header 'Accept: application/metalink4+xml' http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/openSUSE-NET-Build005... The ISO directly http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/openSUSE-NET-Build005... The metalink directly: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/openSUSE-NET-Build005... -- Per Jessen, Zürich (21.8°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 2012-07-13 at 14:47 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
I'm looking at <http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/>, but I see no metalink there. Is the method not to be used now?
The link actually represents both, but if you don't specify that you want the metalink, you get the ISO.
To get the metalink file :
wget --header 'Accept: application/metalink4+xml' http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/openSUSE-NET-Build005...
The ISO directly http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/openSUSE-NET-Build005...
The metalink directly: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.2-RC1/iso/openSUSE-NET-Build005...
Curious! - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAAtloACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Xk7wCbBqFAf35/1B/fIQunzzHWASVA PoIAn0xLOqsefnOjfY9iNCij6vP1iqHZ =SZze -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (13)
-
Andreas Jaeger -
Carlos E. R. -
Carlos E. R. -
Felix Miata -
Fuminobu TAKEYAMA -
johann Luce -
Larry Finger -
lynn -
Marcus Meissner -
Per Jessen -
pgajdos＠suse.cz -
Robert Schweikert -
Stephan Kulow