Re: [opensuse-factory] HPLIP version
On 02/04/09 10:22, Johannes Meixner wrote:
I have no longer any time to work on it continuously (in particular no time to upgrade it continuously).
If you don't mind, then I will build the package and then perform a submitreq.
Have a look at https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485974#c1 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/319231/comments/2
I guess I can easily solve the first one. For the second one I will perform some tests, but I am not sure if I can really reproduce it as I have never seen this on my system. Is there a specific devel project for HPLIP or is it just maintained in Factory ? If so, where is it build for 11.0 and 11.1 ? Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Hello, I appreciate any help regarding HPLIP very much! On Apr 2 10:47 Raymond Wooninck wrote (shortened):
On 02/04/09 10:22, Johannes Meixner wrote:
I have no longer any time to work on it continuously (in particular no time to upgrade it continuously).
If you don't mind, then I will build the package and then perform a submitreq.
As far as I know up to now, submitreq does basically nothing more than telling me that someone likes to get changes committed but it does not provide me information whether or not the changed stuff did successfully build on all architectures. Therefore in the end a submitreq forces me to do build-tests on my own. But since I have no longer any time to work on it continuously I have also no time to do manual build-tests after a submitreq. Furthermore having the newest HPLIP only in factory does not help much for most of our users. In the past when I had time to work on it continuously I provided the newest HPLIP in my home project at least for the current stable openSUSE version and usually also for the version before and for factory. This way our normal users find the newest HPLIP version via http://software.opensuse.org/search which they can use on their currently running openSUSE. This way our normal users do not need to do venturous stuff with factory packages and it avoids that they do nonsense updates with factory packages on their current stable openSUSE or even for the openSUSE version before, compare http://en.opensuse.org/YaST/Development/Printer_Enhancement -------------------------------------------------------------- Under construction for openSUSE 11.1 ... Do not use FACTORY if your system is openSUSE 11.0 or even older. Use the matching package for your particular system. FACTORY is not better, it is worse when you have openSUSE 11.0 or an older system. -------------------------------------------------------------- Therefore I would like to suggest that you build the newest HPLIP for openSUSE 11.0, 11.1, and factory simply in your home project. This way you can work independent of me and you won't get frustrated when your submitreq times out because I simply have no time to work on them continuously. I would very much appreciate it when you make your HPLIP based upon our official source RPM. I think that this would help me most because then I could at any time which fits best for me simply make our official newest HPLIP based upon your HPLIP in your home project. Additionally - as mentioned above - I think that this way we get the newest HPLIP very much more tested when it can be used by our normal users in openSUSE 11.0 and 11.1 so that it helps both our normal users and us. What do you think? Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany AG Nuernberg, HRB 16746, GF: Markus Rex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Le vendredi 03 avril 2009, à 11:52 +0200, Johannes Meixner a écrit :
As far as I know up to now, submitreq does basically nothing more than telling me that someone likes to get changes committed but it does not provide me information whether or not the changed stuff did successfully build on all architectures. Therefore in the end a submitreq forces me to do build-tests on my own. But since I have no longer any time to work on it continuously I have also no time to do manual build-tests after a submitreq.
What you want is: osc rresults GNOME:Factory gnome-panel (osc --help shows some interesting commands ;-)) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Hello, On Apr 3 14:08 Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 03 avril 2009, à 11:52 +0200, Johannes Meixner a écrit :
As far as I know up to now, submitreq does basically nothing more than telling me that someone likes to get changes committed but it does not provide me information whether or not the changed stuff did successfully build on all architectures. Therefore in the end a submitreq forces me to do build-tests on my own. But since I have no longer any time to work on it continuously I have also no time to do manual build-tests after a submitreq.
What you want is: osc rresults GNOME:Factory gnome-panel
(osc --help shows some interesting commands ;-))
This is not what I asked for. More precisely: I do not want to receive any submitreq at all if it was not tested in advance whether or not the suff successfully builds on all architectures to which it should be finally submitted, i.e. the "mbuild" step in our current workflow getpac, [change it], mbuild, submitpac If I am asked to submit something for someone else, the steps until a successful "mbuild" must have already been done - otherwise a request that I should submit it does not make any sense at all. Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany AG Nuernberg, HRB 16746, GF: Markus Rex
Le vendredi 03 avril 2009, à 15:22 +0200, Johannes Meixner a écrit :
Hello,
On Apr 3 14:08 Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 03 avril 2009, à 11:52 +0200, Johannes Meixner a écrit :
As far as I know up to now, submitreq does basically nothing more than telling me that someone likes to get changes committed but it does not provide me information whether or not the changed stuff did successfully build on all architectures. Therefore in the end a submitreq forces me to do build-tests on my own. But since I have no longer any time to work on it continuously I have also no time to do manual build-tests after a submitreq.
What you want is: osc rresults GNOME:Factory gnome-panel
(osc --help shows some interesting commands ;-))
This is not what I asked for.
More precisely: I do not want to receive any submitreq at all if it was not tested in advance whether or not the suff successfully builds on all architectures to which it should be finally submitted, i.e. the "mbuild" step in our current workflow getpac, [change it], mbuild, submitpac
If I am asked to submit something for someone else, the steps until a successful "mbuild" must have already been done - otherwise a request that I should submit it does not make any sense at all.
So you want something like the buildsubmit command of the "osc gnome" plugin to be used by the submitter. This command starts a build on the build service and submits the package if the build was successful. (yes, it shouldn't live in the gnome namespace -- this will get fixed at some point) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
Johannes Meixner -
Raymond Wooninck -
Vincent Untz