[opensuse-factory] been fixed?? libcgroup1-0.37.1-13.1.x86_64.rpm: bad symlink?
Has this been fixed yet? libcgroup1-0.37.1-13.1.x86_64.rpm 19 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0/0 Feb 11 15:48 2013 ./lib64/libcgroup.so.1 -> libcgroup.so.1.0.37 73104 -rwxr-xr-x 1 0/0 Feb 11 15:48 2013 ./lib64/libcgroup.so.1.0.37 19 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0/0 Feb 11 15:48 2013 ./lib64/security/pam_cgroup.so -> pam_cgroup.so.0.0.0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ does not exist! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 23:15, Linda Walsh <suse@...> wrote:
Has this been fixed yet?
libcgroup1-0.37.1-13.1.x86_64.rpm
19 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0/0 Feb 11 15:48 2013 ./lib64/libcgroup.so.1 -> libcgroup.so.1.0.37 73104 -rwxr-xr-x 1 0/0 Feb 11 15:48 2013 ./lib64/libcgroup.so.1.0.37 19 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0/0 Feb 11 15:48 2013 ./lib64/security/pam_cgroup.so -> pam_cgroup.so.0.0.0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ does not exist!
No, not yet, version 0.37.1-12.1.1 from OSS 12.3 is the same: not complete. To be honest, I did not dig deeper, but how did this dangleing symlink pass the package tests (rpmlint, etc)? - Yamaban. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Yamaban wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 23:15, Linda Walsh <suse@...> wrote:
Has this been fixed yet? libcgroup1-0.37.1-13.1.x86_64.rpm ./lib64/security/pam_cgroup.so -> pam_cgroup.so.0.0.0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ does not exist!
No, not yet, version 0.37.1-12.1.1 from OSS 12.3 is the same: not complete.
To be honest, I did not dig deeper, but how did this dangleing symlink pass the package tests (rpmlint, etc)?
- Yamaban.
Bug 817533 Submitted... https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817533 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (2)
-
Linda Walsh -
Yamaban