Anybody knows if Nagios 2.0 will be available with the 10.1 release? Thanks in advanced Ciro
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:33:45AM -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
Anybody knows if Nagios 2.0 will be available with the 10.1 release?
Just look if it is available on the Beta version. That could already be an indicator. houghi -- "I only touch base with reality on an as-needed basis!" -- Royal Floyd Mengot (Klaus)
On 2006-02-14 at 06:32:21 +0100, houghi wrote (shortened):
It's not in 10.1. It was just released last week which was far too late for 10.1. CU, Wolfgang -- SUSE LINUX GmbH -o) Tel: +49-(0)911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstr. 5 /\\ Fax: +49-(0)911-740 53 679 90409 Nuernberg, Germany _\_v simply change to www.suse.com
On 2006-02-14 at 03:10:14 -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote (shortened):
It will be included in future versions, yes. But you can't expect to get 10.2 packages working on 10.1. This *could* work. But anyway I hope that with the buildservice it will be possible to build for 10.1 with newer sources? CU, Wolfgang -- SUSE LINUX GmbH -o) Tel: +49-(0)911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstr. 5 /\\ Fax: +49-(0)911-740 53 679 90409 Nuernberg, Germany _\_v simply change to www.suse.com
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:34:27AM -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
No, I believe the correct way to say it is that it COULD work, not that it SHOULD work. I also have used Mandriva RPMs on my SUSE system without any problem. houghi -- Law of Probable Dispersal: Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.
Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2006 02:51 schrieb Ciro Iriarte:
Just take the latest (nearest src.rpm), you can get your hands on, install it, download the tar ball into /usr/src/packages/SOURCES, adjust the spec in /usr/src/packages/SPECS to your needs and build it with "rpmbuild -ba --target i686-suse-linux specfile". The first time, it will take some time, but with every self build package, it will go faster - down to a few minutes (including addition to a local repo..). Pete
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:01:29AM +0000, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
There's one thing about this discussion/lamenting that I don't understand: nagios 2 has been production quality for a while and has been at least as good as 1.x for more than 2 Suse releases. The major step from 2beta to 2release was that documentation was "complete". We've been using 2.x from alpha stage onwards with networks of more than 2000 manged components. So, what I just don't get: Why does the release of 2.0 make a switch from 1.x to 2.0 so urgent now? ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 12:01 schrieb Ciro Iriarte:
If the latest official SUSE rpm contains one, and you take their spec as the base to build the current version (with adequate adjustments), you will have to take special measures to prevent rpmbuild from including them! It's not rocket science. I highly recommend you to look into: /usr/share/doc/packages/rpm/RPM-HOWTO/index.html Pete
2006/2/16, Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>:
Thanks for the info, i'll check that once i get to the office, so i build my own rpm packages, just don't want to lose the init scripts and other customizations that one gets with the distro's supplied packages, don't even mentioning the updates... And sorry for the top posting, it was my phone/gmail combination's fault. CI.-
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:33:45AM -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
Anybody knows if Nagios 2.0 will be available with the 10.1 release?
Just look if it is available on the Beta version. That could already be an indicator. houghi -- "I only touch base with reality on an as-needed basis!" -- Royal Floyd Mengot (Klaus)
On 2006-02-14 at 06:32:21 +0100, houghi wrote (shortened):
It's not in 10.1. It was just released last week which was far too late for 10.1. CU, Wolfgang -- SUSE LINUX GmbH -o) Tel: +49-(0)911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstr. 5 /\\ Fax: +49-(0)911-740 53 679 90409 Nuernberg, Germany _\_v simply change to www.suse.com
On 2006-02-14 at 03:10:14 -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote (shortened):
It will be included in future versions, yes. But you can't expect to get 10.2 packages working on 10.1. This *could* work. But anyway I hope that with the buildservice it will be possible to build for 10.1 with newer sources? CU, Wolfgang -- SUSE LINUX GmbH -o) Tel: +49-(0)911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstr. 5 /\\ Fax: +49-(0)911-740 53 679 90409 Nuernberg, Germany _\_v simply change to www.suse.com
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:34:27AM -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
No, I believe the correct way to say it is that it COULD work, not that it SHOULD work. I also have used Mandriva RPMs on my SUSE system without any problem. houghi -- Law of Probable Dispersal: Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.
participants (6)
-
Christoph Thiel -
Ciro Iriarte -
Hans-Peter Jansen -
houghi -
Joerg Mayer -
Wolfgang Rosenauer