[opensuse-factory] Re: Why does MS-Windows need no "initrd-equivalent" in order to boot w/a wider range of x86[-64] compat HW?
Philipp Thomas wrote:
For the umteentht time: STOP the stupid cross posting and make up your mind as to where to discuss this.
You tell me where it belongs. It's about Suse 12.2 and suse 12.3 and beyond. Last person I asked which list I should shut out of the discussion, I got no answer, so what's your answer.
Windows doesn't need extra disks / drivers to be pre-loaded unless you are booting from a rescue disk/installation disk.
You have followed the links to the Wikipedia articles describing the boot mechanisms in various Windows versions that David posted yesterday?
==== Why should I? I've read the Windows system internal's book written by a Windows "Fellow", that describes the process in considerably more detail in chapter 13. Maybe you should read the book 'Windows System Internals (5th ed). It tells you why -- boot sector loads a basic device aware booter like lilo, that can then boot images off of any of windows devices... None of them require an initrd. Any other questions? I had stopped cross posting the past several posts, but you seemed to be a case-in-point of not getting the fact that if it was NEVER appropriate to cross post, it could be blocked for everyone at the list-reflector. If it is the case that it is appropriate at times -- then what about a cross-topic subject like this isn't appropriate - what would be an example of something that would be if this isn't? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 2012-11-30 at 03:33 -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
Philipp Thomas wrote:
For the umteentht time: STOP the stupid cross posting and make up your mind as to where to discuss this.
You tell me where it belongs. It's about Suse 12.2 and suse 12.3 and beyond. Last person I asked which list I should shut out of the discussion, I got no answer, so what's your answer.
Chose ONE mail list and stay there. Anything that is not the current factory version is offtopic here. I'm tempted to request that you get banned for two weeks from all mail lists so that you respect the rules next time. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 12.1 x86_64 "Asparagus" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlC4ssAACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Un9gCbBt5lrI7U6zE9MisgCHQRTR8O nQgAnAy31xedDoUO6gb0Pg97hBgavZqD =VD8e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Carlos E. R. wrote:
---- You tell me where it belongs. It's about Suse 12.2 and suse 12.3 and beyond. Last person I asked which list I should shut out of the discussion, I got no answer, so what's your answer.
Chose ONE mail list and stay there. Anything that is not the current factory version is offtopic here.
I'm tempted to request that you get banned for two weeks from all mail lists so that you respect the rules next time.
I notice that you couldn't answer the question. AFAIK, 12.3 is the factory version. If it doesn't belong here then where? AFAIK, this problem is present in 12.2 and the belief that is is necessary is causing many scripts to stop functioning as I've tried upgrading package, so far, there is no indication that there is or will be a viable workaround short of reformatting your system disk, so this also appears to be a 12.2 problem. I again ask you which audience do you think wouldn't want to know the answer to this question or why it can't be solved, or how it could be solved? As I have pointed out -- if it is really impossible to have an issue that affects both the current release and the factory release, which seems unlikely, then having the list software automatically reject any crossposted email sent to either address would be trivial -- I am sure you would agree. This way we wouldn't need self-appointed busy-bodies telling people what to do -- and it wouldn't cause them to be irritated at people who do feel that there are some issues that apply to current and in-development releases, nor would it cause such people to feel like they or their issue is being singled out for harassment. If it is not the case that such a simple solution is appropriate when such filtering is almost certainly already in place for other problematic emails, then it would seem clear it isn't against policy and that there are issues which would be appropriate for both lists. This issue affects those installing 12.2 now, and those who will bein installing it, 12.3 [factory], or 12.4 (next factory). It's an issue that affects both users AND developers -- as such, it is an issue that could benefit from discussion and input from both users who tend more toward being on the 'suse' list, and developers who might, very easily, limit themselves to the factory list. It's an issue appropriate for both venues. So how is it not appropriate to cross-post discussion if it is *ever* appropriate to discuss any issue on both lists? Stop telling me I'm bad and wrong and tell me which audience you think should be shut out of this issue. Haven't you read several responses from many users who think that giving input on issues like this is pointless because such issues are made in arena's where they have no input? Wouldn't having the discussion limited to the factory list further that impression. Even though they are free to join the dev-list, they may not feel all development issues are their interest. However, major issues affecting boot, software compatibility, and disk layout could easily be of more interest to most than more arcane topics. Similarly, but for different reasons, having the discussion only on the more user-oriented list, would also hinder discussion and flow of information. Certainly that is not your intent? I don't know about you, but I have filtering SW that can easily filter 3 copies of a discussion like this, 1 into the user folder, one into the dev folder and one into my 'directly addressed folder' (should I be on the list of recipients directly). Such matters are trivial and not really worthy of the attention either of us are devoting to this matter if such trivialities are the only thing bothering you. Your hostility and zeal for hindering open communication, though, might lead someone to believe otherwise.
- -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 12.1 x86_64 "Asparagus" at Telcontar)
Cheers to you too! Linda W. (from Win7-64 via 12.1 x86_64...). (using Win7 since its release 4 years ago, using [O]SuSE since ~7.0, ~12 years ago)... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, 2012-12-01 at 06:04 -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Chose ONE mail list and stay there. Anything that is not the current factory version is offtopic here.
I notice that you couldn't answer the question.
AFAIK, 12.3 is the factory version. If it doesn't belong here then where?
Again, choose ONE mail list, and stay there. If you think it should be the factory mail list, fine, use factory, but send emails only there. It is against the rules, and it is so for a reason. Do not argue. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 12.1 x86_64 "Asparagus" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlC6EIsACgkQtTMYHG2NR9XV5ACaAozMu2MqAESc0xGWfuB84o1x U2sAnRywkpnXGl6Y317FCUIwiBz1PmKE =CIKS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 15:13 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Saturday, 2012-12-01 at 06:04 -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Chose ONE mail list and stay there. Anything that is not the current factory version is offtopic here.
I notice that you couldn't answer the question.
AFAIK, 12.3 is the factory version. If it doesn't belong here then where?
Again, choose ONE mail list, and stay there.
If you think it should be the factory mail list, fine, use factory, but send emails only there.
It is against the rules, and it is so for a reason. Do not argue.
What is "It" and which rules do you refer to? -Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
* Scott Bahling <sbahling@suse.com> [12-03-12 11:48]:
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 15:13 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: ...
Again, choose ONE mail list, and stay there.
If you think it should be the factory mail list, fine, use factory, but send emails only there.
It is against the rules, and it is so for a reason. Do not argue.
What is "It" and which rules do you refer to?
cross-posting, ie: posting the *same* mail to more than one list. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&ved=0... http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette This page contained specific reference addressing cross-posting but it appears to have been removed ??? It's not really rocket science. Cross posting causes disparate conversations/results/solutions/threads/fights, A Bad Thing(#tm)! -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 12:03 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Scott Bahling <sbahling@suse.com> [12-03-12 11:48]:
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 15:13 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: ...
Again, choose ONE mail list, and stay there.
If you think it should be the factory mail list, fine, use factory, but send emails only there.
It is against the rules, and it is so for a reason. Do not argue.
What is "It" and which rules do you refer to?
cross-posting,
Thanks for clarifying!
ie: posting the *same* mail to more than one list. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&ved=0...
Nice.
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette This page contained specific reference addressing cross-posting but it appears to have been removed ???
I had already checked, and didn't see the word "cross" in the complete wiki page history. That's why I was confused about which rule was being broken. Maybe someone should document the "rule" before we threaten to ban people from mailing lists for not respecting it. I've already added the part about threats. -Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:31:22 +0100 Scott Bahling <sbahling@suse.com> wrote:
I had already checked, and didn't see the word "cross" in the complete wiki page history.
There is one now :)
That's why I was confused about which rule was being broken. Maybe someone should document the "rule" before we threaten to ban people from mailing lists for not respecting it.
Not many were ever banned from openSUSE mail lists. One has to insult few billion people, or create uncalled for daily flames with insults and name calling, effectively blocking traffic, to be banned. Cross posting is not in that category. Authors can be ignored which is pretty effective way to tell that "rule" has been broken, or to put it better, that readers have no time to chase discussion over two or more lists. I'm trying to keep tone in majority of: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette as advisory how to get answer, not some set of rules and regulations that call for punishment if broken. Now that paragraph is there, we need some native English speaker fix language :) -- Regards, Rajko. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
Carlos E. R.
-
Carlos E. R.
-
Linda Walsh
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
Rajko
-
Scott Bahling