Re: Tumbleweed snapshot 20240418 and dracut- pcr-signature
On 4/20/24 11:35 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On 20.04.2024 18:22, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
On 4/20/24 4:48 AM, aplanas wrote:
and for now if you have GRUB2 you should not have sdbootutil not dracut-pcr-signature.
I assume that first "not" was a typo?
The second.
This response is even more confusing to me. I take this sentence fragment to mean "No, the first 'not' was not the typo, the second 'not' was the typo," which would mean the sentence should have been something like "and for now if you have GRUB2 you should not have sdbootutil [but instead have] dracut-pcr-signature" I don't know how to reconcile this with the earlier statement that the correct solution is the deinstallation of dracut-pcr-signature.
On 20/04/2024 17:56, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
On 4/20/24 11:35 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On 20.04.2024 18:22, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
On 4/20/24 4:48 AM, aplanas wrote:
and for now if you have GRUB2 you should not have sdbootutil not dracut-pcr-signature.
I assume that first "not" was a typo?
The second.
This response is even more confusing to me. I take this sentence fragment to mean "No, the first 'not' was not the typo, the second 'not' was the typo," which would mean the sentence should have been something like
"and for now if you have GRUB2 you should not have sdbootutil [but instead have] dracut-pcr-signature"
I don't know how to reconcile this with the earlier statement that the correct solution is the deinstallation of dracut-pcr-signature.
not -> nor ??
El sábado, 20 de abril de 2024 18:03:52 (CEST), Fridrich Strba via openSUSE Factory escribió:
On 20/04/2024 17:56, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
On 4/20/24 11:35 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On 20.04.2024 18:22, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
On 4/20/24 4:48 AM, aplanas wrote:
and for now if you have GRUB2 you should not have sdbootutil not dracut-pcr-signature.
I assume that first "not" was a typo?
The second.
This response is even more confusing to me. I take this sentence fragment to mean "No, the first 'not' was not the typo, the second 'not' was the typo," which would mean the sentence should have been something like
"and for now if you have GRUB2 you should not have sdbootutil [but instead have] dracut-pcr-signature"
I don't know how to reconcile this with the earlier statement that the correct solution is the deinstallation of dracut-pcr-signature.
not -> nor ??
That is what I have understood. Solution #3 works for me. Removing boot-related packages is a bit scary. Cheers, -- Javier Llorente
On 2024-04-20 15:56, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
On 4/20/24 11:35 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On 20.04.2024 18:22, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
On 4/20/24 4:48 AM, aplanas wrote:
and for now if you have GRUB2 you should not have sdbootutil not dracut-pcr-signature.
I assume that first "not" was a typo?
The second.
This response is even more confusing to me.
The second 'not' should be a 'nor'. So if you are using GRUB2 both sdbootutil and dracut-pcr-signature should not be installed.
It should be "nor" instead of "not" in the second place. Therefore, sdbootutil and dracut-pcr-signature should not be installed if you are running GRUB2.
It ought to be "nor" rather than "not" in the second instance. For this reason, GRUB2 users should not install sdbootutil and dracut-pcr-signature. https://geometrygame.io/
participants (6)
-
aplanas -
Eric Schwarzenbach -
Fridrich Strba -
Javier Llorente -
village tunic -
Wade ratke