ssh protocol 1 not disabled
Hi, I just wanted to ask why ssh protocol 1 is still enabled in standard installation? There must be a reason ;-) On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, bugzilla_noreply@novell.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=148471
meissner@suse.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #1 from meissner@suse.de 2006-03-23 06:18 MST ------- ssh protocol v1 will not be disabled yet. (but likely soon)
added 10.1 (i586) and 10.1 (x86_64).
-- Andreas Vetter Tel: +49 (0)931 888-5890 Fakultaet fuer Physik und Astronomie Fax: +49 (0)931 888-5508 Universitaet Wuerzburg
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:47:01PM +0100, Andreas Vetter wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask why ssh protocol 1 is still enabled in standard installation? There must be a reason ;-)
Because I said so. Well, it does not really hurt to have it on, whoever can trick clients to fall back to protocol 1 can do much worse tricks. Default is ssh protocol version 2 for quite some time already. We will disable it post-code10. Ciao, Marcus
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:47:01PM +0100, Andreas Vetter wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask why ssh protocol 1 is still enabled in standard installation? There must be a reason ;-)
Because I said so.
good one :-D
Well, it does not really hurt to have it on, whoever can trick clients to fall back to protocol 1 can do much worse tricks.
Default is ssh protocol version 2 for quite some time already.
We will disable it post-code10.
Thanks. -- Andreas Vetter
Andreas Vetter escribió:
Hi,
I just wanted to ask why ssh protocol 1 is still enabled in standard installation? There must be a reason ;-)
I can imagine is for BC reasons. but the user should be warned in some place of the documentation.... I agree with you, keeping ssh1 is a bad idea.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
I can imagine is for BC reasons. but the user should be warned in some place of the documentation....
BC? What does that mean? houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
I can imagine is for BC reasons. but the user should be warned in some place of the documentation....
BC? What does that mean?
Backwork Compatibility. I would guess. - -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQFEJVUbVtBjDid73eYRAm/5AJ9iDRzJPAvuNKUSePVrQVCb/p7D0QCfS1ad dxNFeAGixyAMRhAa5eUNUh4= =y+lR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
I can imagine is for BC reasons. but the user should be warned in some place of the documentation....
BC? What does that mean?
Backwork Compatibility. I would guess.
s/Backwork/Backword - -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQFEJVXRVtBjDid73eYRAo4BAJ9+OpyjN5gJe2XtGJD4mCWBpj9GWQCeKtKH AgXmwP7snemy1wBYtkqrDVg= =OB2E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
I can imagine is for BC reasons. but the user should be warned in some place of the documentation....
BC? What does that mean?
Backwork Compatibility. I would guess.
s/Backwork/Backword
s/backword/backward/ ;) => backward compatibility! Regards Christoph
On 25 Mar 2006 at 7:38, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
I can imagine is for BC reasons. but the user should be warned in some place of the documentation....
BC? What does that mean?
Backwork Compatibility. I would guess.
s/Backwork/Backword
s/word/wards ? ;-) Ulrich
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 07:34:57AM -0700, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
I can imagine is for BC reasons. but the user should be warned in some place of the documentation....
BC? What does that mean?
Backwork Compatibility. I would guess.
Makes sence. houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
participants (7)
-
Andreas Vetter -
Boyd Lynn Gerber -
Christoph Thiel -
Cristian Rodriguez -
houghi -
Marcus Meissner -
Ulrich Windl