[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed distro date
When I report a bug in KDE using DrKonqi, it inserts the following information at the top of the bug report: Distribution: "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" Where is this date (2016-01-17) taken from, and what does it mean? (Note that I’m using the latest release of Tumbleweed, *not* one from January 2016.) -- Karl Ove Hufthammer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 04/27/2016 08:08 PM, Tomas Chvatal wrote:
Hmm, are you sure? /etc/os-release is being updated whenever there is a new TW snapshot right? But 2016-01-17 is quite old so I believe it may be coming from the lsb_release -r output instead (which AFAIK is uses /etc/lsb-release) which on my TW is built on the 19th of Jan 2016 -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hello, Maybe boo#960501: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960501. It happens when the lsb package is installed. Regards, -- Antoine -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dne středa 27. dubna 2016 21:03:57 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer napsal(a):
$ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/
Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
$ lsb_release -r Release: 20160117 $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" $ rpm -qf /etc/os-release openSUSE-release-20160417-1.1.x86_64 $ cat /etc/os-release NAME=openSUSE VERSION="Tumbleweed" VERSION_ID="20160417" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" ID=opensuse ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:opensuse:20160417" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org/" ID_LIKE="suse" Greetings, Björn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Bjoern Voigt <bjoernv@arcor.de> wrote:
lsb_release takes information from /etc/lsb-release which is created during lsb package install. As "lsb" itself is not updated after initial installation, this file is not updated either. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dne čtvrtek 28. dubna 2016 13:22:11 CEST, Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
Does it mean after installation of newer TW snapshot lsb_release becomes useless? Isn't it a bug? -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:22:11PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
Is KDE/DrKonqi really extracting info from /etc/lsb-release? Or is it picking up the name from the zypper repo set during the first installation from DVD? chunk:/etc/zypp/repos.d # cat openSUSE-20160101-0.repo [openSUSE-20160101-0] name=openSUSE-20160101-0 enabled=1 autorefresh=0 baseurl=cd:///?devices=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ATAPI_iHAS324_B_3524219_348044500958 path=/ type=yast2 keeppackages=0 On my system I don't have /etc/lsb-release, however it does collect correctly from (the updated/rolling) /etc/os-release:- $ lsb_release -a LSB Version: n/a Distributor ID: openSUSE project Description: openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64) Release: 20160417 Codename: n/a I can't remember the context I've come across the "old" date, but I have wondered a few times on the occasions that I have seen it - it could have been when using yast2. Daniel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
It's created during build. So as long as there's no full rebuild it won't update. Does /etc/lsb-release need to exist anyways? If not the lsb_release command could just parse /etc/os-release instead. If /etc/lsb-release is really needed as file it should probably point to somewhere in /var instead where a trigger on openSUSE-release could update it. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dne čtvrtek 28. dubna 2016 13:22:11 CEST, Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
After upgrade to the newest snapshot: $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160422) (x86_64)” So that its output has been updated. -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/
On 04/27/2016 08:08 PM, Tomas Chvatal wrote:
Hmm, are you sure? /etc/os-release is being updated whenever there is a new TW snapshot right? But 2016-01-17 is quite old so I believe it may be coming from the lsb_release -r output instead (which AFAIK is uses /etc/lsb-release) which on my TW is built on the 19th of Jan 2016 -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hello, Maybe boo#960501: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960501. It happens when the lsb package is installed. Regards, -- Antoine -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dne středa 27. dubna 2016 21:03:57 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer napsal(a):
$ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/
Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
$ lsb_release -r Release: 20160117 $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" $ rpm -qf /etc/os-release openSUSE-release-20160417-1.1.x86_64 $ cat /etc/os-release NAME=openSUSE VERSION="Tumbleweed" VERSION_ID="20160417" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" ID=opensuse ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:opensuse:20160417" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org/" ID_LIKE="suse" Greetings, Björn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Bjoern Voigt <bjoernv@arcor.de> wrote:
lsb_release takes information from /etc/lsb-release which is created during lsb package install. As "lsb" itself is not updated after initial installation, this file is not updated either. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dne čtvrtek 28. dubna 2016 13:22:11 CEST, Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
Does it mean after installation of newer TW snapshot lsb_release becomes useless? Isn't it a bug? -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:22:11PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
Is KDE/DrKonqi really extracting info from /etc/lsb-release? Or is it picking up the name from the zypper repo set during the first installation from DVD? chunk:/etc/zypp/repos.d # cat openSUSE-20160101-0.repo [openSUSE-20160101-0] name=openSUSE-20160101-0 enabled=1 autorefresh=0 baseurl=cd:///?devices=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ATAPI_iHAS324_B_3524219_348044500958 path=/ type=yast2 keeppackages=0 On my system I don't have /etc/lsb-release, however it does collect correctly from (the updated/rolling) /etc/os-release:- $ lsb_release -a LSB Version: n/a Distributor ID: openSUSE project Description: openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64) Release: 20160417 Codename: n/a I can't remember the context I've come across the "old" date, but I have wondered a few times on the occasions that I have seen it - it could have been when using yast2. Daniel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
It's created during build. So as long as there's no full rebuild it won't update. Does /etc/lsb-release need to exist anyways? If not the lsb_release command could just parse /etc/os-release instead. If /etc/lsb-release is really needed as file it should probably point to somewhere in /var instead where a trigger on openSUSE-release could update it. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Dne čtvrtek 28. dubna 2016 13:22:11 CEST, Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
After upgrade to the newest snapshot: $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160422) (x86_64)” So that its output has been updated. -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/
participants (9)
-
Andrei Borzenkov -
Antoine Belvire -
Bjoern Voigt -
Daniel Morris -
Karl Ove Hufthammer -
Ludwig Nussel -
Markos Chandras -
Tomas Chvatal -
Vojtěch Zeisek