Christian Boltz wrote:
# grepsig mailman % Wenn diese Liste über Mailman betrieben würde, dann würden wir den ganzen Tag nichts anderes machen als eine Menschenkette zum nächsten Computerladen aufrechtzuerhalten um RAM in einem konstanten fluss in lists.suse.com einzubauen ;) [Henne Vogelsang in suse-linux] ###cb### 2003-05-30 %
Haha, I googled it and the earliest I got was 2006. Remarkably, lists.suse.com is running mailman2.
Mailman _WAS_ considered and (obviously, because of it's need of RAM) rather fast discarded as an alternative... And I very much doubt the actual list-server has anything to do with the "problem", it rather is the WUI (Web-User-Interface) to the _ARCHIVE_ of the list that is the problem. And mlmmj has nothing to do with that. Nor had ezmlm.
Just as a sidenote (and without having read the full discussion yet) - our current list-owner (Per) thinks about switching to mailman (after testing etc.). AFAIK the usual ENOTIME is delaying this.
Yes, I have long been wanting to move us to mailman2, but real life and other priorities keep getting in the way.
I don't know if switching to mailman would also mean to change our mailinglist archive because (at least currently) it's completely independent from the mailinglist software.
Moving the archive too would only mean more effort, so I would expect that to come later, if at all. There is no reason why our current setup should not work with mailman2. If anyone is interested in working on an improved archive interface, I'll be happy to help with the basics. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (29.4°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org