8 Feb
2006
8 Feb
'06
20:45
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
What I don't understand: Why do you want to support YUM now and wanted to drop APT? Everybody I know uses APT instead of YUM, because YUM is very slow, when refreshing package lists e.g. Even most Red Hat/ Fedora users are fed up with YUM...
We are not using YUM -- we are using the metadata format that YUM uses as well. Calling those installation repors "YUM sources" might be a bit misleading. Actually they should be called "RPM Metadata" or RepoMD or something like that... Regards Christoph