Andreas Jaeger wrote:
This kind of discussion style does not bring us anywhere, let's end the thread,
---- What type of discussion style do you want, in order to proceed to fix this problem... or is your intent just to stop the fixing of the problem?
I don't like your accusation style.
you were the one who opened with "lets end the thread", indicating no willingness to engage in any type of discussion. I responded with a question about what discussion style you wanted in in order to proceed with fixing the problem, (i.e. since you indicated your desire to end the thread was based on the style, perhaps a different style would work -- and I offered), or, I asked, was it merely your intent to end the discussion and no style would work. That wasn't an accusation -- it was a question for clarification of how to proceed that would suite you -- OR to clarify that you really didn't care to proceed in any manner, and your intent was just to shut me up. Labeling my offer 'accusatory', paints you in a bit of a bad light. It indicates you aren't willing to discuss things and this isn't OPEN anything. It was and *still is( your choice to respond in a positive way. It's a choice... which I am giving, instead of accusing. That the choice might feel accusatory if you were already closed on the subject an your only mission is to silence me OR you might have misinterpreted my honest attempt at making it a choice. I don't need to do any work to fix it, I can simply send you the spec files for 12.1 and be done with it. Case solved. Now the question becomes, would you accept such a fix? Are you open to it being fixed? So I can ask you again .. what works?
Btw. I'm not considering that openSUSE needs to support mounting of /usr with initrd.
It's your attitude that /usr must be on the same partition as root in order for it to boot -- whether it is on a ram disk or on a physical disk is immaterial. I was told systemd no longer required this. This is the third time I ask -- is this not the case?
If this is a request for you, then support it yourself. openSUSE comes with an initrd and we assume that it's there...
You are breaking 40 years of backward compatibility with absolutely no concerns. You think this is only my issue? You think a slow booting system is only my concern? There were quite a few people who spoke up against this -- and likely the only reason most of them aren't respond (maybe 1 other) is that they have either given up on SuSE as becoming MS's plaything, or given up on Suse being responsive to "the community[sic]"... which is increasingly appearing to be a joke. Nice the way you wipe out 40 years of compat with your own personal fiat - nice dictatorial, non-community response. you want a way to fix it -- go back to 12.1 where the bin-files lived in /bin, not in /usr/bin w/symlinks in /bin... How could anyone justify having a subdir that was KNOWN to be a separate partition on many peoples system be the homedir for bins and put symlinks in the root dir -- ESPECIALLY for MOUNT?!?!?! That's insane!.... I asked for any reason why it had to change from 12.1 to 12.2 -- no one wants to give one. The main effect of this is to break direct boot which seriously compromises development and security. You ignore the issues of speed of boot -- and development. Those are important to many people as well. Yet you ignore those issues. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org