On Friday, March 16, 2018 9:33:52 AM CET tomtomme wrote:
That is exactly the scope of Phoronix.
Care to explain how those network-benchmarks could be improved? The discussed benchmark you are slandering is only a preview, the full comparison is in the works. It was requested and payd for by a user, so it must be useful to him.
As a Tumbleweed user I enjoy those benchmarks, so entertaining it is, yes. But at the same time they deliver also vaild data points, sometimes on a small scale (hardware wise), and sometimes with nice big comparisons when it comes to gaming / gpus.
I'm not a developer. But the one thing I heard mentioning in the past is that Michael is basically testing default configurations , which can be quite different between distros and are not always appropriate for he tested subject. I personally read phoronix a lot but I know how I take it. The Benchmarks sometimes seems to be made in a hurry and in a drive-by manner. Nobody disputes that he is a workoholic , with the frequency of updates to the site. But to be honest , what annoys me most is that he mostly links to his own posts instead of the source and his constant grandstanding , e.g. I was the first to report etc.. or as I have reported several times before .. I have not seen this specific benchmarks though. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org