![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6eeda98eb3b2221d3906cdb1df863c33.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
17 May
2024
17 May
'24
07:28
On 17/05/2024 10:10 am, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 8:26 AM Miika Alikirri via openSUSE Factory
wrote: Do you think that is a bug or a feature?
lastlog2 is not 100% compatible with lastlog, as lastlog2 solved several problems lastlog had. To make lastlog2 100% compatible we would need to re-introduce the problems of lastlog, and we clearly don't want that.
Since I already got several bug reports about "not 100% compatible", I don't see the missing symlink as a bug but something, which reduces my workload.
I see. That makes sense. Thanks! :) Best, Miika