On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 16:41 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2020-08-26 16:22, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
Which means we need to adjust xdm and lsb. Where the question is, if they really need this requires, as procps is really something always installed.
Always?
$ rpm -e procps --test error: Failed dependencies: procps is needed by (installed) zypper-1.14.37- lp152.2.5.4.x86_64
and inside the SUSE containers that you, Richard et al are working on/towards, I imagine there may not even be a zypper present.
Inside those containers there will almost certainly be 'busybox-procps' In those cases, having a package with a hard requires for the 'procps' package is actually a pain in the posterior. So Thorsten's question is valid, packages should only require 'procps' if they really, really need _the procps package_, else it should always be safe to assume the system will have something that provides procps functionality. -- Richard Brown Linux Distribution Engineer - Future Technology Team Phone +4991174053-361 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org