Am 22.08.22 um 08:59 schrieb Simon Lees:
On 8/22/22 15:05, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:39:21 +0200, Eric Schirra wrote:
Sorry Takashi,
I don't think that's right. Because a few weeks ago I asked for exactly the same reason how the repos should be called, because you can't find a description/guideline anywhere. I was told: openSUSE_Leap_15.3 15.4 One long and one short. Well. That's how they want it.
I myself don't mind either way, honestly speaking.
If there is neither proper guide line nor official recommendation, I don't mind even to keep them as is, and proactively ignore any complaints about the resource usage.
In reality we have a pretty big mix everywhere with 15.3 some repo's changed others didn't this was pretty much at maintainers discretion while as a community we decided on this list that we should use 15.4 rather then openSUSE_
Whoever told him "how they want it" for 'openSUSE_Leap_15.3', was either wrong or speaking for their own special repo. It went the exact other direction in devel:languages:python, where his request to change it back caused everything to break down. https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.opensuse.org/thread... I can't find the vote discussion on the mailing list archives anymore but I am pretty sure that it was before the 15.4 times. The change was from openSUSE_Leap_15.3 to 15.3 https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.opensuse.org/messag... When you create new repositories through the web-interface (https://build.opensuse.org/projects/<project>/distributions/new), you get '15.3' and '15.4'. And there is a rudimentary explanation behind the "?" for the different variants from which you can choose. So Takashi's initiative is the correct one in unifying stuff. Please don't talk him out of it. - Ben