On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 03:37:46AM +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-05-29 22:25, Roger Luedecke wrote:
On Sunday, May 29, 2011 11:54:50 AM Felix Miata wrote:
I'd much rather a boot that takes up to 3 minutes than a quick-to-boot system incapable of doing all the many things that had been working fine for many years, and already as of 11.3 don't.
Newer != better. Time spent dealing with or hampered by brokenness, and grasping & retaining an entirely new set of 12-20+ character long system control commands, far outweighs mere seconds gained at boot time.
I completely and absolutely agree. A slightly faster boot time is not worth problems with simply booting. And besides, there are other areas to focus development in.
+1
What? It's not _just_ a matter of booting faster at all. I suggest everyone take a look at the "systemd for administrators" series of posts that describe exactly why we want and need systemd on our systems. Go read them and tell me that you want to stick with your 1980's based init.d boot sequence and I'll point you at slackware :) greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org