On jeudi, 8 février 2018 18.45:46 h CET Michal Kubecek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:50:56PM +0100, martin@pluskal.org wrote:
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 15:45 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2018-02-08 13:55, Tomas Chvatal wrote:
we still happen to have may packages depending on xorg-x11-devel which is metapackage pulling in whole x11 stack to the dependency chain.
libXcm, which is in your list, has:
%if 0%{?suse_version} != 0 && 0%{?suse_version} < 1130 BuildRequires: Mesa-devel BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel %else BuildRequires: pkgconfig(x11) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xfixes) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xmu) %endif
So, false positive :-)
Thank you Jan for this helpfull message - I hope that I speak for others when I say that this is exactly kind of content that I hope to see on this mailing list.
Thanks a lot!
Well, Jan's reply is definitely way more useful than yours. Sad part is it's not the first attack of this kind. Perhaps you find it funny but I, for one, don't share your opinion.
Michal Kubeček
At least there's one important point in Jan message and what it planned by tomas
I will also add rpmlint error to fail all packages that are adding this dependency (as we are keeping the package for weird binary 3rd party apps, but do not want it in OBS).
If the list given is etablished by some rules that rpmlint will use, then some of our maintainers will get errors that shouldn't ... tomas would you mind to explain a bit more that point ? Thanks -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe fellowship GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org