data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bad/65badd2c8816d80c04261c0fceb768dafda04e32" alt=""
Am 03.12.2014 um 08:52 schrieb Mathias Homann:
Then you'd stick with SFW2, of course.
I think I haven't made myself clear here:
I am not promoting firewalld as a *replacement* for SFW2, all I'm saying is that there are use cases for a firewall where firewalld might be more suited than SFW2, so we might want to offer it as an alternative.
We had and have enough fun with alternative network manangement and init systems already. No need to extend that to firewalls :-) So I'd prefer one solution properly integrated rather than two half-baked ones. Let's collect a list of differences/missing features to have proper facts to evaluate whether firewalld can replace SFW2 resp which effort is needed to achieve that. The hint with the logging is already a very good one. Do we have a wiki page for firewalld yet? cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5; 90409 Nürnberg; Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org