On Tuesday 2012-09-04 10:47, Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar wrote:
Quoting Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@suse.cz>:
On Tuesday 04 of September 2012 04:42EN, Graham Anderson wrote:
On Monday 03 Sep 2012 18:30:48 Carlos E. R. wrote:
Agreed. We should ditch systemd and return to systemv.
Then you also will steup up and maintain it when nobody else is prepared to?
If it was only about maintaining System V init, I certainly would. But I somehow suspect that it won't be only that. I'm afraid this "sysvinit dropping" will also mean pushing package maintainers to drop init scripts from their packages (maybe even to the point of OBS checks requiring it) and building things like udev or D-BUS in a way that will make them unusable without systemd running.
This is a very ridiculous statement, sorry.
The package maintainers will not be 'pushed' to drop it. Nor will any scripts ensure there are no initV scripts. That's just pure non-sense
The only thing is: packages might make full use of systemd by this commitment and bugs arising in sysV are to be solved by whoever steps up for it...
and FYI: udev became an integral part of systemd already: there won't be any new udev releases EVER again I'm afraid. (See http://lwn.net/Articles/490413/ )
udev was pretty much important to systemd even before. They just combined the source in the move that you linked - it even says so in the 1st paragraph. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org