On 31/05/17 17:01, Antonio Larrosa wrote:
On 31/05/17 15:43, Antonio Larrosa wrote:
On 31/05/17 12:37, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote: [...]
Hmm, I think that's a very good idea. Just note pkg_version is the macro that returns the package version, so I'll call it %pkg_version_test if that's ok for you. That could very well replace the %pkg_version_at_least/ %pkg_version_at_most/... "high-level" macros with something probably even more readable and equally short.
Just wondering... let's do a small poll.
I change my vote to 1.a and 2.f since I like Dominique's idea.
How would you call ... 1) The macro that has one argument (package name) and returns its version number?
a) pkg_version : 5 votes b) pkg_version_number c) package_version : 1 vote d) pkg_ver
2) The macro that has 3 arguments (package_name, operator, version number) and tests whether the condition is true or not? a) pkg_version_test b) pkg_version_check c) pkg_version d) is_pkg_version e) test_pkg_version f) pkg_vcmp : 3 votes g) pkg_versioncmp : 1 vote h) package_version_compare : 1 vote
So... the winners are: pkg_version and pkg_vcmp which I submitted at https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/501101 Thanks for sending your opinions! -- Antonio Larrosa -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org