-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 El 2016-06-16 a las 10:16 +0200, stakanov@freenet.de escribió:
El 2016-06-15 a las 19:53 +0200, Manfred Hollstein escribió:
freedom because of mostly being open source? Why should we then compromise for getting *some* proprietary packages by switching to "snap",
Nobody said "switch to snap".
Carlos. Aren't you underestimating the normative power of the industry and the capital here? If you offer it and (although bringing a higher security risk to the user) if it is easier to prepare packages in this format for all distribution, I will simply not offer anything else anymore. Because it is cheaper and, as a result, I maximize my profit. If there are problems with security as a producer of software it is even better: one blame it on the distribution and on the OS. For me that system has a great future. :-)
No, that does not apply to the opensource side of things. - -- Cheers Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" (Minas Tirith)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAldiZjIACgkQja8UbcUWM1z8wAD/bIgtdta6ZeTCMdOJeb+3wge0 Tvjj55kD8faubVPXMQMA/jWil1yK7/309iUmNg39M8KifKKhwbwDRUR7dTuZopmB =IgyQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----